I was going to post a question about where to find this and then I thought of another search term. This is funny, but also kind of sad because some people believe ridiculous "proof" like this. For example, the more money we spend on space exploration, the more people commit suicide.
http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
The fallacy iis so old that the Ancient Romans had a phrase for it: "After this, therefore because of this." (post hoc, ergo propter hoc) I guess we will never learn.
jerryc41 wrote:
I was going to post a question about where to find this and then I thought of another search term. This is funny, but also kind of sad because some people believe ridiculous "proof" like this. For example, the more money we spend on space exploration, the more people commit suicide.
http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlationsI imagine all the research that goes into those charts are funded by our government??
jerryc41 wrote:
I was going to post a question about where to find this and then I thought of another search term. This is funny, but also kind of sad because some people believe ridiculous "proof" like this. For example, the more money we spend on space exploration, the more people commit suicide.
http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlationsIt is seeing a
Correlation with out finding, showing, or proving
Cause and Effect. It is what scientists try to avoid doing.
An example: I see nothing in a bottle with a vacuum in it, therefore another clear bottle with oxygen in it also likely contains nothing. Wrong of course.
foodie65 wrote:
I imagine all the research that goes into those charts are funded by our government??
Actually, the CIA maintains The World Factbook with wonderful stats across countries. If the government didn't collect data, who would? You prefer to live in ignorance? By the way, I loved these charts during my 45 years of teaching statistics. For a different way to be misled by coincidental data, check out the topic "regression toward the mean."
jerryc41 wrote:
https://www.google.com/search?q=regression+toward+the+mean&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS716US717&oq=regression+toward+the+mean&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.647j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Regression toward the mean can lead to misleading interpretations. In my early years, I met with some educators who were "proving" the effectiveness of their instruction by selecting underachieving students, doing their magic and retesting the children. And, wow, the kids' scores went up.
We could have a lot of fun trying to guess the cause & effect relationship for each. For example, I'm pretty sure eating cheese before bedtime makes one toss and turn thus increasing the likelihood of strangulation by twisted bedsheets. And as for the correlation between Japanese car sales and increased suicide by auto crashes I would ask if the suicide victims were driving the Japanese car at the time? Oh yeah, and after watching Nicholas Cage in "Leaving Las Vegas" I was so depressed I considered suicide, too!
We have to disband NASA. And I knew there was a reason I didn't care much for Nicholas Cage.
G Brown
Loc: Sunny Bognor Regis West Sussex UK
lies,damn lies and statistics.....! it is all in the choosing.
It happens all of the time. Folks just don't think clearly and aren't taught to reason anymore. It's not just this fallacy, it's all of the other ones too.
For proof, go to the Attic and read.
There may be high correlation in all these cases, but certainly no causation exists, making the correlation nothing but an interesting observation. I believe there was almost a perfect correlation between the first fifteen or so super bowl victors and the stock market direction in those years. If the winning team was from the original NFL, the market would go up; if the AFL team won, the market would go down. Worked for quite a while, but I suspect that is no longer the case. I believe that the study of meaningless correlations is referred to as econometrics.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.