Too much mega?
Jul 26, 2017 14:49:39 #
Bill_de wrote:
If you had to prove an opinion there wouldn't be a... (show quote)
I'm with the CIB man. I'm here to *learn* and many times I read text that I don't agree with...many of *those* times the thread evolves and I may come around to that contrary post. Civility is necessary on a forum such as this, IMO...
Jul 26, 2017 14:52:53 #
tdekany wrote:
Where is your proof that fuji is superior?
I never said it was. I have Nikons and Fujis. I prefer the Fujis, but I have no opinion regarding "superiority". I only know what I LIKE, and why I like it.
Jul 26, 2017 14:59:23 #
Bill_de wrote:
If you had to prove an opinion there wouldn't be a... (show quote)
Your opinion is incorrect, not sure why you would think that. ANY thread I can? I would have no time to do anything if that was the case.
I also had an opinion and called the posters claim BS. When Cat replied to me, I provided a link.
Evidently, objective findings don't fly well on UHH.
BTW, the poster didn't read as an opinion, more like a FACT = SUPERIOR.
Isn't it interesting that this forum is full of untalented snapshot shooters who make outrages claims nearly every day?
The truth is, that a big sensor is not going to make you a better shooter. Neither does time. But so many here seem to think that way.
Jul 26, 2017 15:01:04 #
tdekany wrote:
Where is your proof that fuji is superior?
I would like to apologize to the rest of the readers for feeding the troll.
Jul 26, 2017 15:30:33 #
CatMarley wrote:
I never said it was. I have Nikons and Fujis. I prefer the Fujis, but I have no opinion regarding "superiority". I only know what I LIKE, and why I like it.
So how very different that is from writing
Quote:
- this guy shoots Sony.According to Fuji the X-T2 has an aps-c sensor, not a 4/3. In that lies part of its superiority to the Olympus
Jul 26, 2017 22:16:14 #
CatMarley wrote:
My parents and children would argue I was a debater before, during and after. Love a real argument with logical people! Hard to find these days. Few possess a classical education anymore. What passes for argument most places is silly name calling.
Amen. I was lucky enough to hang out with some debaters in college and watch them get into it. One of them was Tony Snow (Fox News, Detroit Free Press, White House Press Secretary under 'Dubya'). You did NOT want to take the contrarian view around him. Interestingly, he was a left-wing radical at Davidson.
Another was sci-fi fantasy author, lawyer, comic collector, and recent UNCC English professor, Nancy Northcott. She was the Yin to Tony's Yang on that team. The team two years behind us beat Oxford in 1979 or '80. I would love to have watched that.
Jul 26, 2017 22:23:56 #
Jul 26, 2017 22:27:46 #
CatMarley wrote:
I would like to apologize to the rest of the readers for feeding the troll.
LOL! We're all trolls in some context. UHH is not for the faint-hearted.
Jul 26, 2017 23:28:22 #
burkphoto wrote:
LOL! We're all trolls in some context. UHH is not for the faint-hearted.
Burke, have you ever done usenet? Newsgroups? This is absolute kids in the sandbox in comparison. Hahaha, ijs...
Jul 27, 2017 00:55:43 #
Another interesting discussion on how important gear is to getting great photos: http://www.diyphotography.net/five-pros-say-gear-matters-agree/
Jul 27, 2017 03:27:01 #
CatMarley wrote:
I would like to apologize to the rest of the readers for feeding the troll.
So if someone is not in agreement with you, you call that person a troll? Nice! You must be lots of fun in real life.
You just defended someone's opinion who has had no personal experience with either brand. Im sure there must be a logical explanation for that.
Jul 27, 2017 09:42:54 #
chasgroh wrote:
Burke, have you ever done usenet? Newsgroups? This is absolute kids in the sandbox in comparison. Hahaha, ijs...
Oh, tell me about it! I was on Usenet back in 1993. There were rabid donkeys on crack cocaine lurking as trolls back then. Fortunately, 19.2 Kbps dial-up was too slow to do any real damage...
Jul 27, 2017 10:15:19 #
burkphoto wrote:
Oh, tell me about it! I was on Usenet back in 1993. There were rabid donkeys on crack cocaine lurking as trolls back then. Fortunately, 19.2 Kbps dial-up was too slow to do any real damage...
1992 was the beginning of the end. Before that Usenet was academic in nature. Microsoft discovered it 1996 and that pretty much finished it off.
Jul 27, 2017 12:04:13 #
Apaflo wrote:
1992 was the beginning of the end. Before that Usenet was academic in nature. Microsoft discovered it 1996 and that pretty much finished it off.
So true. As soon as AOL and similar services took off, and web browsers came of age, the Internet became the new CB radio.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.