SATS wrote:
I like the bunny too but you have missed a bit of its ear. Well someone had to say it and it was me. Oh dear. The hawk is really my favourite, it is fortunate it was turning towards you. I know how difficult that shot was, it is whole levels above my ability. Are you able to get such shots with the camera / lens combo as is or do you need to bump the ISO? My real ambition is to take a feet forward picture of a bird of prey. Have you ever managed that shot?
SATS...I truly thank you for your very generous compliments, and welcome to the Ugly Hedgehog Forum. I just want you to know that I had nothing to do with that missing chunk of the rabbits ear.
Some of the hawks, like the broad-winged species are not nearly as difficult to photograph because we see them all the time soaring in sky or sitting on an open perch such as a fence post or telephone pole. The Cooper's Hawk (that I posted in my photo) is a member of the Accipiter genus which includes the smaller sharp-shinned hawk and the larger goshawk. They are very difficult to photograph because they are quite secretive by nature, and we really never get to see them but for a fleeting moment. To answer your question...no, I've never even come close to getting a shot of a bird of prey with it's feet forward, coming at me.
For birds in flight I mostly use a 400 mm lens on my camera. That is my preferred set-up. Since I have to use a high shutter speed of at least 1/1600 of a second, my ISO has to be cranked up to 400 or more. If the bird is perched, then I can use a slower shutter speed, and a reduce my ISO considerably.
Lame Duck,
You forgot the most important piece of gear - the device on your shoulders!
Lame-Duck wrote:
Rohn...I was shooting yesterday with a Canon 1D X and my old faithful Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L lens. It's still the cheapest L series long distance telephoto lens on the market. I also use a Canon 7DII, but I find myself preferring the full frame cameras over the crop factor APS-C sensor 7DII. Don't get me wrong, I still use the 7DII a lot and would recommend it in a heart beat. Crop factor cameras like the 7DII do give you more long distance magnification. For example, the 400 mm lens on my 1D X give me 8X magnification, whereas my 7DII having a crop factor, gives me a magnification of 12.8X using the same 400mm lens. That is quite a significant difference between the two cameras. But when you consider image quality, the full frame 1D X is somewhat better in my opinion. Both cameras are used by very well know bird and wildlife photographers, and both do a great job.
Rohn...I was shooting yesterday with a Canon 1D X ... (
show quote)
mikewskier wrote:
Lame Duck,
You forgot the most important piece of gear - the device on your shoulders!
OK Mike...I'm slow witted today. What device on my shoulders?
Your head, creativity, skill
mikewskier wrote:
Your head, creativity, skill
Ha, ha, ha,...I told you I was slow witted today.
Thanks for the compliment.
I don't think the quality of these shots was luck. Top notch all the way!!
raymondh wrote:
I don't think the quality of these shots was luck. Top notch all the way!!
Very kind of you to say Raymond. I think that persistence plus luck often work together.
vicksart
Loc: Novato, CA -earthquake country
This is a beautiful set masterfully done.
vicksart wrote:
This is a beautiful set masterfully done.
Vicki...Your great compliments are truly appreciated; they are so thoughtful. I thank you for commenting and stopping by for a look.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.