Post your favorite photography myth-buster!
Jun 27, 2017 20:51:05 #
Overpriced, Low value (IMHO Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, etc offer far better value)
Not a fan of B&W, and only a single (OK - - 1-1/2) blurry color image(s) included on the web site
Sure - - Hasselblad (I guess U oughta spell it right) went to the moon - - should have left them there
Not a fan of B&W, and only a single (OK - - 1-1/2) blurry color image(s) included on the web site
Sure - - Hasselblad (I guess U oughta spell it right) went to the moon - - should have left them there
Jun 27, 2017 20:59:15 #
Tom G
Loc: Atlanta, GA
Merlin1300 wrote:
Overpriced, Low value (IMHO Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, etc offer far better value)
Not a fan of B&W, and only a single (OK - - 1-1/2) blurry color image(s) included on the web site
Sure - - Hasselblad (I guess U oughta spell it right) went to the moon - - should have left them there
Not a fan of B&W, and only a single (OK - - 1-1/2) blurry color image(s) included on the web site
Sure - - Hasselblad (I guess U oughta spell it right) went to the moon - - should have left them there
Jesus Wept !!!
Another one who can't say what he means.
What are you trying to say Merlin?
Jun 27, 2017 21:25:25 #
Tom G wrote:
I don't think Jesus was there when the OP photos were takenJesus Wept !!! Another one who can't say what he means. What are you trying to say Merlin?
Certainly confused about the purpose of the thread
Composition is nothing special, I'm not a particular fan of B&W, Unsure what this has to do with any Myth Buster
Not sure what you can do with a $15K Hasselblad that I can't with my $1200 80D (certainly not for the serious hobbyist)
And your point is ??
Jun 27, 2017 21:27:53 #
Jun 27, 2017 22:09:14 #
All professional photographers shoot with a minimum of a FF sensor.
Jun 27, 2017 22:28:43 #
You must get the latest camera offered...... it will solve all your problems. ...
Jun 27, 2017 22:36:51 #
yorkiebyte wrote:
You must get the latest camera offered...... it will solve all your problems. ...
Wait...that's not true?
Jun 27, 2017 23:18:15 #
Jun 28, 2017 11:47:39 #
RAFriedman wrote:
Mine: Hasselbads are no good for shooting hand-held. Bunk! I did a whole year book project using one just that way. I even made 16"x16" prints with no problem. Also, the Hassy has a mirror release that you can hit first before doing a critical shot and the camera is easily as smooth as a TLR. I've rambled all over NYC with one and never used a tripod. Some of the shots are here:
http://rafriedman.com
http://rafriedman.com
No need for a zoom lens, your feet can be your zoom.
Jun 28, 2017 13:00:48 #
fantom wrote:
No need for a zoom lens, your feet can be your zoom.
Jun 28, 2017 14:14:44 #
Jun 28, 2017 14:26:50 #
Jun 28, 2017 15:50:16 #
RAFriedman wrote:
Mine: Hasselbads are no good for shooting hand-held. Bunk! I did a whole year book project using one just that way. I even made 16"x16" prints with no problem. Also, the Hassy has a mirror release that you can hit first before doing a critical shot and the camera is easily as smooth as a TLR. I've rambled all over NYC with one and never used a tripod. Some of the shots are here:
http://rafriedman.com
http://rafriedman.com
"It is the photographer and not the gear that is important."
http://www.thewanderinglensman.com/2017/06/if-it-is-photographer-and-not-gear-that.html
Jun 30, 2017 10:56:05 #
"Never use Auto". This is a good one in light of the fact that in cameras and post processing the latest technology usually goes into advanced algorithms to make these features cutting edge. Doesn't mean you have to use them. Just means it's another high tech tool for you to use if you choose.
boberic wrote:
Never use auto
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.