I attach a photo taken with a Nikon B700 at full optical zoom--a RAW file, with modest adjustments in Capture NX-D. I used a circular polarizer. ISO 100. Following that, I attach a B&W conversion of the same photo, done in Lightroom. To adjust the tones, it was helpful to have a color file so you could manipulate the color channels.
Which do you prefer? The color version or the black and white version.
How so? My guess is that you prefer the color and do not think it a close call.
Ask "what does color add to the story?" For me, a feeling of warmth, energy and vibrancy. The black and white, as composed, is IMO a bit chaotic with no place for my eye to rest.
I can see potential in a more carefully composed shot and thinking specifically for a black and white result: a study of lines, shadows, shapes - perhaps even semi-abstract. Something that I don't have to puzzle over, wondering what your vision was for the result.
Now, talk about your preference, please. What attracted you to do a b&w version?
Linda From Maine wrote:
Ask "what does color add to the story?" For me, a feeling of warmth, energy and vibrancy. The black and white, as composed, is IMO a bit chaotic with no place for my eye to rest.
I can see potential in a more carefully composed shot and thinking specifically for a black and white result: a study of lines, shadows, shapes - perhaps even semi-abstract. Something that I don't have to puzzle over, wondering what your vision was for the result.
Now, talk about your preference, please. What attracted you to do a b&w version?
Ask "what does color add to the story?" ... (
show quote)
I generally shoot black and white photos. I have been experimenting with my new bridge camera and I got this shot. I thought that it might be a case in which I would prefer color despite my predisposition for black and white. So, I made a black and white version to compare. With the color, the shot is all about the color. For me, it works even with an inexpensive bridge camera with a small sensor. Sharpness, etc. seems not relevant. I agree that I would likely do something different if I had thought of B&W to begin with. Not sure. But the color photo just seems to speak for itself. It is a different way of thinking and shooting for me.
whwiden wrote:
How so? My guess is that you prefer the color and do not think it a close call.
Not even close. Flowers used to be photographed in B&W because color film was not available at the time.
whwiden wrote:
I generally shoot black and white photos. I have been experimenting with my new bridge camera and I got this shot. I thought that it might be a case in which I would prefer color despite my predisposition for black and white. So, I made a black and white version to compare. With the color, the shot is all about the color. For me, it works even with an inexpensive bridge camera with a small sensor. Sharpness, etc. seems not relevant. I agree that I would likely do something different if I had thought of B&W to begin with. Not sure. But the color photo just seems to speak for itself. It is a different way of thinking and shooting for me.
I generally shoot black and white photos. I have ... (
show quote)
I didn't think about the possibility you normally shoot b&w and it was the color that was the experiment. Thanks!
I am not a fan of turning a beautiful colored subject into a B&W ... UNLESS there is a specific reason (like mood perhaps).
tainkc wrote:
Not even close. Flowers used to be photographed in B&W because color film was not available at the time.
I had not given it much thought, but that is certainly correct. A lot of thought went into using filters to get a look--a red filter for a rose to make it white, etc. But now I suppose you see much less of that.
Howard5252 wrote:
I am not a fan of turning a beautiful colored subject into a B&W ... UNLESS there is a specific reason (like mood perhaps).
I am coming to that realization having been focused on black and white images for so long, continuing due to an interest in film which I can easily develop myself.
Yep, that is becoming even more clear to me. Thanks.
whwiden wrote:
I had not given it much thought, but that is certainly correct. A lot of thought went into using filters to get a look--a red filter for a rose to make it white, etc. But now I suppose you see much less of that.
Yeah, I remember that. I do remember reading in the Old Testament somewhere, "Lo and with the advent of Kodachrome". I think it was in reference to God giving man wisdom.
I prefer the color without question! Good shot, whwiden!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.