Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 25, 2017 06:32:22   #
Shoeless_Photographer Loc: Lexington
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
The high ISO is why it's so grainy. The T2i isn't known for having a good high iso sensor. That's the first camera I had and you ought to keep the ISO at or below 400. Sometimes you just need to come back on a better day to take pictures if the light isn't good.


My T3 starts getting really ugly by ISO 800. I try to have it max out at 400 as much as possible, but I usually set it at 100.

Reply
May 25, 2017 09:19:52   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Shoeless_Photographer wrote:
My T3 starts getting really ugly by ISO 800. I try to have it max out at 400 as much as possible, but I usually set it at 100.


Peterff wrote:
I agree with that observation. T2i and T3i have the same sensor I believe. Not much changed sensor wise until the T6i / T6s. Not knocking either camera, they were good for their time, but technology keeps improving, including Canon sensors and lenses.




Reply
May 25, 2017 09:36:05   #
Paul Buckhiester Loc: Columbus, GA USA
 
PHRubin wrote:
I recently purchased this lens and am disappointed. At 300mm the image is soft. Has anyone else experienced this or did I just get a dud?


I meant to include this.


(Download)

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 09:44:17   #
Paul Buckhiester Loc: Columbus, GA USA
 
Oops. I meant to include exif. ISO 3200, F5.6 and 1/160 at 300mm on Canon 70d handheld.

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:29:50   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
I know why it is grainy, what I asked was about sharpness. The last shot was at f8 as opposed to 5.6 (wide open at 300mm).

Reply
May 25, 2017 17:43:42   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
Here is a daylight shot at f8 1/500, ISO 800 ROOTC. ANy thoughts? Better, but I'm undecided.


(Download)

Reply
May 25, 2017 18:05:02   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
PHRubin wrote:
Here is a daylight shot at f/8 1/500, ISO 800 ROOTC. Any thoughts? Better, but I'm undecided.


Can we assume that you don't have a filter on the lens?

Have you tried a shot on a tripod, remote shutter release, mirror locked up?

Things that will reduce any environmental considerations. Given the 1.6 angle of view factor at 300mm this lens equivalent to a 480mm lens from a camera shake / motion perspective. A shutter speed of 1/800 or 1/1000 if hand held might help. However I do understand balancing ISO, shutter speed and aperture with a T2i.

Good luck.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 20:04:02   #
Paul Buckhiester Loc: Columbus, GA USA
 
PHRubin wrote:
Here is a daylight shot at f8 1/500, ISO 800 ROOTC. ANy thoughts? Better, but I'm undecided.


Looks good there

Reply
May 26, 2017 12:10:49   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
Peterff wrote:
Can we assume that you don't have a filter on the lens?

Have you tried a shot on a tripod, remote shutter release, mirror locked up?

Things that will reduce any environmental considerations. Given the 1.6 angle of view factor at 300mm this lens equivalent to a 480mm lens from a camera shake / motion perspective. A shutter speed of 1/800 or 1/1000 if hand held might help. However I do understand balancing ISO, shutter speed and aperture with a T2i.

Good luck.


Yes - I removed the UV filter before these shots. With the lens hood there really is no need for it.
Yes - tripod No - remote shutter release or mirror lockup

Reply
May 26, 2017 12:44:16   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Peterff wrote:
Have you tried a shot on a tripod, remote shutter release, mirror locked up?

By the old rule-of-thumb, he should be able to hand-hold this lens at 1/480 or faster.

I'm no longer a Canon owner, but from the name I understand it is stabilized; surely that should also reduce the need for tripod, remote release, mirror locked, and everyone quiet in the county

Reply
May 26, 2017 15:01:14   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
rehess wrote:
By the old rule-of-thumb, he should be able to hand-hold this lens at 1/480 or faster.

I'm no longer a Canon owner, but from the name I understand it is stabilized; surely that should also reduce the need for tripod, remote release, mirror locked, and everyone quiet in the county


Yes I agree, and I usually do so, but if really wanting to test the lens I thought that removing as many extraneous variables as possible could be useful.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.