Donna, excellent. That 5D IV sure does help in addition to the lens and the photographer.
Greg
Thank you so much, Greg! I was thinking about you while I was posting, and that's why I listed the 100-400. I hope you're still liking yours. And I credit the 5D iv with being able to use such a high iso and not be deafened by the noise. Actually I've been setting the iso on automatic with low light situations, and it's been handling the noise well. I couldn't do that with the Mk2.
Thank you so much, Greg! I was thinking about you while I was posting, and that's why I listed the 100-400. I hope you're still liking yours. And I credit the 5D iv with being able to use such a high iso and not be deafened by the noise. Actually I've been setting the iso on automatic with low light situations, and it's been handling the noise well. I couldn't do that with the Mk2.
Donna, still love the lens. I have thought about moving from the V1 to the V2 but really see no reason to. I use the TC III 1.4 on it about 25% of the time and I find no degrading of the image, at least to my eyes. I am always impressed with your new body. The 5D IV is so great I can not see the need to go to the 50mp series. Both you and Angela are blessed with the husbands you have and the cameras you currently use.
Donna, still love the lens. I have thought about moving from the V1 to the V2 but really see no reason to. I use the TC III 1.4 on it about 25% of the time and I find no degrading of the image, at least to my eyes. I am always impressed with your new body. The 5D IV is so great I can not see the need to go to the 50mp series. Both you and Angela are blessed with the husbands you have and the cameras you currently use.
Greg
Donna, still love the lens. I have thought about ... (show quote)