CatMarley wrote:
At home. A little film developer vessel thingy must still be available and cheap, as are the chemicals necessary. Once you have the negatives, you can get someone with a good film scanner to make some nice big files for you to print.
It's a nice idea, and might spark a renewed interest in film use, but let's see...
Tanks are $23 (for one 35mm reel) to $25 (for two 35mm reels or one 120 reel) new at B&H. Reels are $30 for 35mm, or $15 to $50 for 120.
Timers are on your smartphone. Or, you can pay $125 for a Gra-Lab 300...
Of course, he would need a big plastic tub like TSA uses in airports (to temper the water around the developing tank and bottles of chemicals). $15 - $20 at industrial supply houses.
Chemical bottles for storing/tempering mixed Developer, Stop Bath, Fixer, Hypo Clearing Agent, and Photo-Flo (quart size, about $4.00 each; gallons, about $8.00 each)
Decent darkroom thermometer: $13 to $40
Various Measuring Graduates (Gallon, Quart, Pint, 5-6 Oz.): $50
Mixing Paddles: $7
Developer: $6 to $50 per gallon
Stop Bath concentrate: $6.50 and up
Rapid Fixer: $14
Heico PermaWash: $20
Photo-Flo: $8
Changing Bag: $24 (or a closet or bathroom that is completely dark: FREE)
Then, of course, he would need knowledge of how to process very old film exposed a long time ago, using the right developer and time. Emulsions deteriorate over time, as do latent images on them. So some compensation is needed. Knowledge of how old the film is, and when it was exposed, is helpful in determining that. There are guidelines on the Internet from several sources. They are rough estimates... So much determines the state of the film: heat, humidity, background radiation, age...
So yes, he could do it, and it would make lots of sense if it were going to be an ongoing hobby. But at around $225 to $400 to set up for and soup one roll? I dunno.
I have all that stuff (except chemicals), left over from the 1970s – 1990s, just in case I ever get crazy enough to use film again. So I might do it if the film were mine, and I were curious enough. But I'd probably use the outfit I mention in my next post.