Howard Dean proving once again Liberals have no F'ing idea what the constitution is about!
Apr 22, 2017 10:34:40 #
Apr 22, 2017 10:58:42 #
I think Liberals have an idea. The idea is that it is a piece of parchment that seems to get in the way of doing whatever they want to do.
--Bob
--Bob
idaholover wrote:
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/howard-dean-coulters-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/
Apr 22, 2017 11:01:04 #
She should have been allowed to speak. The students would then have had a lesson in how hate can destroy a person, a city, a country.
Apr 22, 2017 11:13:01 #
The Dean remarks are not about what liberals know or don't know. In the matter of Coulter's incendiary speech, it's words are protected by the First Anendment BUT that anendment does not shield her from the consequences of those words. The commonly made point is does the First Amendment allow one to shout FIRE in a crowded theatre; the answer is Yes but you will be liable for damages that transpire. The point is that every coin has two sides.
Apr 22, 2017 12:28:44 #
Coulter herself has said, if they aren't outraged with your opening remarks, you're not trying hard enough.
Apr 22, 2017 17:00:11 #
amyinsparta wrote:
She should have been allowed to speak. The students would then have had a lesson in how hate can destroy a person, a city, a country.
She says, while looking in a mirror!
Apr 22, 2017 19:26:14 #
amyinsparta wrote:
She should have been allowed to speak. The students would then have had a lesson in how hate can destroy a person, a city, a country.
You must be thinking about yourself. Twit.
Apr 22, 2017 21:34:38 #
idaholover wrote:
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/howard-dean-coulters-hate-speech-not-protected-first-amendment/
What people like Dean do not understand the freedom of speech IS THE FREEDOM TO OFFEND. That is the main purpose of free speech. If all speech is limited to whatever the establishment says it should be it is not free speech.
Apr 22, 2017 21:58:31 #
boberic wrote:
What people like Dean do not understand the freedom of speech IS THE FREEDOM TO OFFEND. That is the main purpose of free speech. If all speech is limited to whatever the establishment says it should be it is not free speech.
For liberals, any speech that is contrary to their agenda they have labeled "hate Speech" and they will do anything to prevent anyone from hearing it.
Apr 22, 2017 22:02:09 #
boberic wrote:
What people like Dean do not understand the freedom of speech IS THE FREEDOM TO OFFEND. That is the main purpose of free speech. If all speech is limited to whatever the establishment says it should be it is not free speech.
Don't bother, she's not intelligent enough to understand that concept.
Apr 23, 2017 07:55:31 #
One has only to read some of the comments and posts in the Attic to learn that hate speech must indeed be protected by the First Amendment.
Apr 23, 2017 11:53:20 #
DavidJon wrote:
One has only to read some of the comments and posts in the Attic to learn that hate speech must indeed be protected by the First Amendment.
Not really. The First Amendment prohibits the government from censoring free speech. UHH is a privately owned website, and would be well within their rights to censor whatever they want.
Apr 23, 2017 12:21:29 #
That is something quite a few people do not know or believe.
--Bob
--Bob
JohnSwanda wrote:
Not really. The First Amendment prohibits the government from censoring free speech. UHH is a privately owned website, and would be well within their rights to censor whatever they want.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.