I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes last year and have a refund coming (bad news, I made less money last year but good news, I have a small windfall coming). I've decided to treat myself to my first Prime lens. I have a Nikon D7100 and three lenses. A tokina 11-16, Nikon 24-120, and my kit Nikon 55-300. I'd appreciate any recommendations for a Prime lens. Should I get a 35mm or a 50mm? Is 1.8 fine or should I go 1.4? I shoot everything from wildlife, to landscapes, to portraits (my grandson is 2 1/2).
The 50mm Nikon 1.8 is an excellent lens. Even though I have the Nikon trio, I shot just 50mm for about a year.
My next purchase will be a 35mm 1.8.
I own the 50mm f1.8 on a DX camera. Like you, I have other zoom lenses. The 24-120mm you own is a very good lens. I get good results from my prime 50mm. However, if you have the extra money, go for the 50mm f1.4. I heard it is a better lens. The 35mm is a lens, that some Nikon owners on this forum, say is a joy to have. Good luck.
Looks like you have everything covered with the glass u already own. But, hey, there's always room for one more. If I were you, 50mm f1.4 would be my pick. For those nice grandson pictures with a beautiful Bokeh....get the 50.
I would suggest the 35mm. The faster f-stop isn't really necessary. It's extra money you'll pay for little use. If it comes right down to that .4 difference in f-stops, you can compensate with a bit more ISO. The 35mm on the D7100 will be similar to a 50mm on a full frame camera.
--Bob
Michael652 wrote:
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes last year and have a refund coming (bad news, I made less money last year but good news, I have a small windfall coming). I've decided to treat myself to my first Prime lens. I have a Nikon D7100 and three lenses. A tokina 11-16, Nikon 24-120, and my kit Nikon 55-300. I'd appreciate any recommendations for a Prime lens. Should I get a 35mm or a 50mm? Is 1.8 fine or should I go 1.4? I shoot everything from wildlife, to landscapes, to portraits (my grandson is 2 1/2).
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes las... (
show quote)
Michael652 wrote:
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes last year and have a refund coming (bad news, I made less money last year but good news, I have a small windfall coming). I've decided to treat myself to my first Prime lens. I have a Nikon D7100 and three lenses. A tokina 11-16, Nikon 24-120, and my kit Nikon 55-300. I'd appreciate any recommendations for a Prime lens. Should I get a 35mm or a 50mm? Is 1.8 fine or should I go 1.4? I shoot everything from wildlife, to landscapes, to portraits (my grandson is 2 1/2).
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes las... (
show quote)
Theoretically for a DX camera like a D7100 a 35mm is a "normal" lens, but any fast, f/1.4 to f/2.0 35mm or 50mm prime lens would be a good choice. You might also consider a 50mm or 55mm Micro-Nikkor if you decide to shoot close-up or macro. I'm sure you'll get more advise than you can use.
Either the 35mm and the 50mm would make an excellent choice. I own and regularly use both. Comparing the two, each requires a slightly different approach towards your intended subject. In most cases, it will be a matter of a few steps towards or away from the subject. Of course you can find out which of the two focal lengths is a better match for your photographic style by exploring each in depth on your 24-120 lens. Unless you do a lot of wide aperture shots (for example, at f2/8) I wouldn't bother with the more costly 1.4 version. There won't be very much advantage over the 1.8 version.
Mac
Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
Michael652 wrote:
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes last year and have a refund coming (bad news, I made less money last year but good news, I have a small windfall coming). I've decided to treat myself to my first Prime lens. I have a Nikon D7100 and three lenses. A tokina 11-16, Nikon 24-120, and my kit Nikon 55-300. I'd appreciate any recommendations for a Prime lens. Should I get a 35mm or a 50mm? Is 1.8 fine or should I go 1.4? I shoot everything from wildlife, to landscapes, to portraits (my grandson is 2 1/2).
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes las... (
show quote)
For an APS-C sensor camera like the D7100 I think a 35mm would be a good choice, f/1.8 would be fine.
Michael as others have mentioned... 35mm (50mm equivalence) is an appropriate prime to start with... albeit for grandson portraiture a 50mm (75mm equivalence) might be ideal thus the plastic fantastic AF 50mm f/1.8D Nikkor
If you are seeking a high acuity lens (Pro Glass) in 35mm then the choice is easy...
Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM A Nikon
However if you wish to invest in the wisest price/value scenario in 35mm again the choice is easy...
Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G
This isn't my opinion but rather that of DxOMark
https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Best-lenses-for-the-24M-Pix-Nikon-D7100-Part-I/Best-prime-lenses-for-the-D7100Note: For the very highest acuity available the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2G ED VR II literally walks away from everything else... But few can pony up the price of admission here...
Hope this helps Michael
rmalarz wrote:
I would suggest the 35mm. The faster f-stop isn't really necessary. It's extra money you'll pay for little use. If it comes right down to that .4 difference in f-stops, you can compensate with a bit more ISO. The 35mm on the D7100 will be similar to a 50mm on a full frame camera.
--Bob
Totally agree Bob. I have both the 35g and a 50d. These are probably the best value for money, lenses on the market.
Michael652 wrote:
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes last year and have a refund coming (bad news, I made less money last year but good news, I have a small windfall coming). I've decided to treat myself to my first Prime lens. I have a Nikon D7100 and three lenses. A tokina 11-16, Nikon 24-120, and my kit Nikon 55-300. I'd appreciate any recommendations for a Prime lens. Should I get a 35mm or a 50mm? Is 1.8 fine or should I go 1.4? I shoot everything from wildlife, to landscapes, to portraits (my grandson is 2 1/2).
I just found out I overpaid my estimated taxes las... (
show quote)
Should I get a 35mm or a 50mm?
Both are very good lens. They are small and easy to carry around - good in places where you do not want to make it obvious you have more than a simple P&S. For indoors, the 35 mm is IMHO better.
If you are going to be hand holding the camera a lot take a look at Tamron's new SP series of prime lenses. The reason is they all have stabilization. They also have a metal lens barrel and are fully weather sealed including a weather seal at the lens mount. I won't buy a lens if it doesn't have a weather seal at the lens mount. I bought the 45mm f/1.8 for my Nikons. The new lenses are the 35mm f/1.8, 45mm f/1.8, 85mm f/1.8, and 90mm f/2.8 macro.
I couldn't decide,so I purchased both. I lean toward the 35 and my wife prefers the 50. There,that should help!
the 50mm f1/8 is just fine ..it is the go to lens for most photos ..if you go with the 35mm you will find yourself with distorted portraits as it is really more of a wide angle lens..plus it will make people look a bit heavier..and you don't want to do that now do you..lol..
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.