Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Astronomical Photography Forum
Jumping on the Bandwagon
Apr 5, 2017 15:30:42   #
Oknoder Loc: Western North Dakota
 
Since it seems many of us were imaging this target I figured I would not wait till I got more data in the Lum, and just process with what I had.

L: 2.8hr @600s
R: 2hr @300s
G: 2hr @300s
B: 2hr @300s

Any and all critique welcome,
Matthew


(Download)

Reply
Apr 5, 2017 15:59:47   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
Oknoder wrote:
Since it seems many of us were imaging this target I figured I would not wait till I got more data in the Lum, and just process with what I had.

L: 2.8hr @600s
R: 2hr @300s
G: 2hr @300s
B: 2hr @300s

Any and all critique welcome,
Matthew

Very very cool Matthew it seems that 600 sec is the consensus for shooting Galaxies.
Craig

Reply
Apr 6, 2017 00:49:09   #
Europa Loc: West Hills, CA
 
Wow, that is nice!

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2017 14:16:01   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Oknoder wrote:
Since it seems many of us were imaging this target I figured I would not wait till I got more data in the Lum, and just process with what I had.

Matthew

Nice detail!

bwa

Reply
Apr 6, 2017 16:04:59   #
Oknoder Loc: Western North Dakota
 
CraigFair wrote:
Very very cool Matthew it seems that 600 sec is the consensus for shooting Galaxies.
Craig


I tend to restrict my exposures to 300s, 600s and 1000s exposures. I do this not because of any founded experience, but more to do with limiting the size of my dark library. So basically laziness is my driving factor. This way I only need a base number of exposures. I compile these into two seasonal categories for either summer and winter temps. Since my cameras are cooled I stick to -20c in the summer and -50c in the winter, even though I could go colder it would require the taking of more darks.

I do this so besides my light subs all I am required to shoot are the flat frames, which are much easier now that I made my own flat panel out of an old lcd screen.

Reply
Apr 6, 2017 16:06:16   #
Oknoder Loc: Western North Dakota
 
Thanks for all the kind comments, even though I had higher expectations than I was able to achieve, it did come out decent enough.

Matthew

Reply
Apr 7, 2017 13:37:25   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
Spectacular image!

Reply
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Apr 7, 2017 13:43:43   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
Oknoder wrote:
Since it seems many of us were imaging this target I figured I would not wait till I got more data in the Lum, and just process with what I had.

L: 2.8hr @600s
R: 2hr @300s
G: 2hr @300s
B: 2hr @300s

Any and all critique welcome,
Matthew


I like it! Very nice.

Reply
Apr 7, 2017 14:53:03   #
Oknoder Loc: Western North Dakota
 
Thanks for all the kind comments

Reply
Apr 7, 2017 16:55:15   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
Oknoder wrote:
Thanks for all the kind comments


They are all well deserved. You did a nice job.

Reply
Apr 7, 2017 18:06:34   #
stepping beyond Loc: usa eastcoast
 
Damn nice imaging and processing Matthew, I've still working my way to getting everything to work together. My mount tracking isn't great so , getting my guiding to work. That will help allow longer exposures limiting bloating stars but, lately its been hit or miss. Keep up the good work!

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Apr 7, 2017 19:30:45   #
nikonshooter Loc: Spartanburg, South Carolina
 
Oknoder wrote:
Since it seems many of us were imaging this target I figured I would not wait till I got more data in the Lum, and just process with what I had.

L: 2.8hr @600s
R: 2hr @300s
G: 2hr @300s
B: 2hr @300s

Any and all critique welcome,
Matthew


Well done!

Reply
Apr 8, 2017 09:56:54   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Beautiful! So crisp and clear.
What camera and telescope?
I guess you have your new pier done then?

Wireless, or wired?

Reply
Apr 8, 2017 20:13:04   #
Oknoder Loc: Western North Dakota
 
I do have a temporary/permanent pier, sadly it isn't where I want to build my observatory, but as it stands there are too many hurdles that seem insurmountable to place my observatory on top of the butte in my backyard, like originally intended.

This image was shot with an Apogee camera mounted to my cheap AT6RC. I am still using my almost decade old laptop, only because I haven't been too happy with the small micro PCs I have tried. I am still using my main wiring harness that has three cables that run up the counterweight bar to a small box mounted on top of my telescope which has my USB hub, controllers for dew heaters, DC/DC converters for bring the voltage from 12vDC to 9vDC for my Nikon's and 12vDC to 6vDC for the Apogee.

I am sure I will figure these issues out but on top of my schedule it seems like the seasons keep slipping away.

Matthew

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.