Depth Of Focus
Mar 15, 2017 12:24:56 #
Here's my title photo I made for my photo club's Photo Share session next month: Depth Of Focus.
Comments Welcomed
Comments Welcomed
Mar 15, 2017 12:44:50 #
Mar 15, 2017 13:19:32 #
'Depth of focus' concerns light at plane of focus on the sensor (or film); 'Depth of field' concerns amount of subject that is in acceptable focus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_focus
https://www.videomaker.com/article/d2/13086-the-difference-between-depth-of-field-and-depth-of-focus
https://www.videomaker.com/article/d2/13086-the-difference-between-depth-of-field-and-depth-of-focus
Mar 15, 2017 13:45:10 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
'Depth of focus' concerns light at plane of focus on the sensor (or film); 'Depth of field' concerns amount of subject that is in acceptable focus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_focus
https://www.videomaker.com/article/d2/13086-the-difference-between-depth-of-field-and-depth-of-focus
https://www.videomaker.com/article/d2/13086-the-difference-between-depth-of-field-and-depth-of-focus
Mar 15, 2017 13:46:06 #
This seems a bit odd because the word is out of focus where the image is in focus.
Perhaps the title should be in focus, and a photo that begins in focus and blurs out.
It probably should read Depth of Field.
When you have it complete will you share the slides with us?
Perhaps the title should be in focus, and a photo that begins in focus and blurs out.
It probably should read Depth of Field.
When you have it complete will you share the slides with us?
Mar 15, 2017 14:33:53 #
If you're doing a program on 'Depth of Focus' your image doesn't reflect that concept. In fact, it doesn't even reflect 'Depth of Field'.
As nikonian72 put it, your image should be a cut-away of a camera showing the point of focus being the plane of the sensor.
As nikonian72 put it, your image should be a cut-away of a camera showing the point of focus being the plane of the sensor.
Mar 15, 2017 14:34:52 #
jim quist wrote:
This seems a bit odd because the word is out of focus where the image is in focus.
Perhaps the title should be in focus, and a photo that begins in focus and blurs out.
It probably should read Depth of Field.
Perhaps the title should be in focus, and a photo that begins in focus and blurs out.
It probably should read Depth of Field.
Nailed it.
Mar 15, 2017 17:36:22 #
GAlanFInk wrote:
Nailed it.
This was meant to be funny! Doesn't anyone have a sense of humor?!
Mar 15, 2017 17:43:23 #
Mar 15, 2017 17:45:53 #
twowindsbear wrote:
Only if you add a smiley face
Or say "lol"
Or better yet - both
Or say "lol"
Or better yet - both
Mar 15, 2017 18:06:49 #
Mar 15, 2017 21:11:36 #
rlaugh wrote:
We're all way to serious my friend!!!!!
I think this one riled the purists among us Bob! And you know what I think of them!
Mar 15, 2017 21:24:04 #
Snap Shot wrote:
I think this one riled the purists among us Bob! And you know what I think of them!
Mar 15, 2017 21:50:41 #
Snap Shot wrote:
Kinda difficult to see the difference between mis-information and a sophomoric attempt at humor.This was meant to be funny! Doesn't anyone have a sense of humor?!
Mar 15, 2017 22:04:25 #
Its a bit disturbing to my eyes to see the blurred lettering hovering over the sharply focused road. The juxtaposition seems a bit incongruous.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.