Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Links and Resources
Comprehensive Article on Mirrorless
Mar 8, 2017 15:50:49   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/more-thoughts-on-the-state.html

My friend sent this to me, so I'm passing it along to those who may be interested.
Mark

Reply
Mar 8, 2017 16:28:26   #
pounder35 Loc: "Southeast of Disorder"
 
markngolf wrote:
http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/more-thoughts-on-the-state.html

My friend sent this to me, so I'm passing it along to those who may be interested.
Mark


I'm not sure of the fascination with mirrorless. Two items come to mind. Fewer moving parts to cause problems and less vibration from a reflex mirror movement. The lack of vibration could be a slight advantage when shooting hand held at slower shutter speeds. Canon used a system of gears in the "A" series back in the late 70's to dampen mirror caused vibration. I'm not sure if it made much difference but I made a LOT of money on doing repairs for the infamous "shutter squeak" . It had nothing to do with the shutter. It was a gear in the anti-vibration system needing lubrication. I came up with "kit" with an instructional CD and a syringe with a little oil that told "A" series owners how to fix the problem at home in less than 10 minutes. Sold a lot of them on ebay to rave reviews.

Reply
Mar 8, 2017 16:39:29   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
markngolf wrote:
http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/more-thoughts-on-the-state.html

My friend sent this to me, so I'm passing it along to those who may be interested.
Mark


Very interesting article.

Reply
 
 
Mar 8, 2017 16:56:32   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
Glad you found it interesting.
Thanks for the response.
Mark
Architect1776 wrote:
Very interesting article.

Reply
Mar 8, 2017 20:19:51   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
markngolf wrote:
Glad you found it interesting.
Thanks for the response.
Mark


It was less biased than others I have seen and so was worth the read.

Reply
Mar 8, 2017 21:08:59   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
Yes, it seemed objective.
Mark
Architect1776 wrote:
It was less biased than others I have seen and so was worth the read.

Reply
Mar 9, 2017 09:01:26   #
Charmdragon Loc: Plymouth, Massachusetts
 
Good share Mark. There were a few points I might like developed or explained in more depth, but not often you find a seemingly non-biased article. The author is a committed Nikon shooter but almost no reference to anything Nikon.

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2017 09:04:59   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
Thanks for the feedback. My friend is a super photographer in the Raleigh area and has been one of my "gurus" for years. He's extremely knowledgeable and very unbiased with respect to photography.
Mark
Charmdragon wrote:
Good share Mark. There were a few points I might like developed or explained in more depth, but not often you find a seemingly non-biased article. The author is a committed Nikon shooter but almost no reference to anything Nikon.

Reply
Mar 9, 2017 11:40:32   #
Galahad
 
Thank you for sending this thoughtful article, Mark. I am a committed Olympus user. Have most of their lenses ,except the pricey professional 300mm and the latest zoom.For many years I have used the Canon MK5 and L quality lenses with much satisfaction
but I do not see much difference in the image quality with the landscape shots I take - with the exceptions of low light performance
and blowing up prints to wall size. I print my own with a Epson SC p800 printer.. I am also based in Raleigh.

Reply
Mar 9, 2017 14:09:59   #
lateron Loc: Yorkshire, England
 
markngolf wrote:
http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/more-thoughts-on-the-state.html

My friend sent this to me, so I'm passing it along to those who may be interested.
Mark


Many thanks. very useful!!

Reply
Mar 9, 2017 19:58:24   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
Thanks for the comments & response. Are you a member of Cap City CC? My friend is.
Mark
Galahad wrote:
Thank you for sending this thoughtful article, Mark. I am a committed Olympus user. Have most of their lenses ,except the pricey professional 300mm and the latest zoom.For many years I have used the Canon MK5 and L quality lenses with much satisfaction
but I do not see much difference in the image quality with the landscape shots I take - with the exceptions of low light performance
and blowing up prints to wall size. I print my own with a Epson SC p800 printer.. I am also based in Raleigh.
Thank you for sending this thoughtful article, Mar... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2017 19:58:44   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
Glad it was.
Mark
lateron wrote:
Many thanks. very useful!!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.