Canon sx50 vs Olympus em10 ii
Mar 7, 2017 11:56:55 #
I'm going on a trip to Central Europe. I own two wonderful travel cameras and can't decide which to take. The bridge camera would eliminate the need for extra lenses. The mirror less, with a Panasonic 20mm, is better quality and would fit in my pocket. Additionally, I have the 12-50 and 40-150 for versatility. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated
Mar 7, 2017 12:04:52 #
drbilly wrote:
I'm going on a trip to Central Europe. I own two wonderful travel cameras and can't decide which to take. The bridge camera would eliminate the need for extra lenses. The mirror less, with a Panasonic 20mm, is better quality and would fit in my pocket. Additionally, I have the 12-50 and 40-150 for versatility. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated
Take the Panasonic and the extra lenses, it will likely take up less space and weigh less than the SX50, and you get better quality quality.
Mar 7, 2017 12:12:20 #
letmedance wrote:
Take the Panasonic and the extra lenses, it will likely take up less space and weigh less than the SX50, and you get better quality quality.
I agree!
Mar 7, 2017 12:56:05 #
drbilly wrote:
Is changing lenses that much of a problem for you? First priority, I would take the camera providing the best quality. Second priority, I would take the smaller camera. I don't see a real issue here.I'm going on a trip to Central Europe. I own two wonderful travel cameras and can't decide which to take. The bridge camera would eliminate the need for extra lenses. The mirror less, with a Panasonic 20mm, is better quality and would fit in my pocket. Additionally, I have the 12-50 and 40-150 for versatility. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated
Mar 8, 2017 15:19:29 #
If you are only shooting out of doors, the bridge camera will do a fine job. If you plan to shoot inside churches cathedrals, you need a fast lens and high ISO. Only a DSLR with good low light capabilities will do.
Mar 8, 2017 18:31:01 #
Mar 8, 2017 18:45:12 #
I once made the mistake of ordering an SX50. Sold it right away. There is a HUGE quality difference between the 2 systems. However, if you are happy with the results from the SX50, just carry it alone. I would take the EM10 II
Mar 8, 2017 18:55:25 #
Edia wrote:
If you are only shooting out of doors, the bridge camera will do a fine job. If you plan to shoot inside churches cathedrals, you need a fast lens and high ISO. Only a DSLR with good low light capabilities will do.
I guess that depends on your standards. I was quite satisfied with ISO 400 images I took in {dark} mission churches when we went to Calif two years ago. I was using my Pentax Q-7, a 4.65 crop-factor MILC with its f/1.9 prime standard lens - its IBIS allowed me to go to rather slow shutter speeds.
Mar 8, 2017 21:43:16 #
The EM10 is a high quality mirrorless camera from a truly creative camera company. The SX50 is merely a bridge camera from Canon.
In what way is there a question here?
In what way is there a question here?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.