Lying Claire McCaskill or Forgetful?
green
Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
get rid of them both.... that's fair enough, we don't need anymore liars in government.
green wrote:
get rid of them both.... that's fair enough, we don't need anymore liars in government.
Great idea! Let's start a petition to get rid of the liars! Just imagine, what will happen to the real estate market in D.C.!
green wrote:
get rid of them both.... that's fair enough, we don't need anymore liars in government.
There goes the whole DemoCrap Party.
I believe selective memory is a perquisite for election to the Senate. None wants to admit it. Thus both McCaskill and Sessions were communicating truth...in their own minds.
Voters are supposed to fix the problem. Unfortunately, they have to wait six years.
Just wondering if the OP read the last paragraph of the article he posted...
"The Russian ambassador has never called me. The Russian ambassador has never requested a meeting. I have never met with the Russian ambassador one-on-one," McCaskill said. "I went to a meeting on adoptions, and he was there. But it was a bunch of senators. And it had nothing to do with the Armed Services Committee."
Where is the lie? Just curious. In fairness, I did not look at the other links, maybe it is in them.
green wrote:
get rid of them both.... that's fair enough, we don't need anymore liars in government.
Who would do that? The liars?
That's exactly what happened with the last election. Why do you think the establishment's jaw dropped!
mwalsh wrote:
Just wondering if the OP read the last paragraph of the article he posted...
"The Russian ambassador has never called me. The Russian ambassador has never requested a meeting. I have never met with the Russian ambassador one-on-one," McCaskill said. "I went to a meeting on adoptions, and he was there. But it was a bunch of senators. And it had nothing to do with the Armed Services Committee."
Where is the lie? Just curious. In fairness, I did not look at the other links, maybe it is in them.
Just wondering if the OP read the last paragraph o... (
show quote)
You are damn right I read it doughnut boy. I posted it. Did you read her tweet that totally contradicts that? Thought so. She lied, or being charitable, she misspoke. That is the bottom line. She did exactly what she is accusing Sen Sessions of. Her and many others. Learn to read chump.
idaholover wrote:
That's exactly what happened with the last election. Why do you think the establishment's jaw dropped!
That question is way too difficult for him to answer.
FlyingTiger wrote:
You are damn right I read it doughnut boy. I posted it. Did you read her tweet that totally contradicts that? Thought so. She lied, or being charitable, she misspoke. That is the bottom line. She did exactly what she is accusing Sen Sessions of. Her and many others. Learn to read chump.
Are tweets the same type of thing as congressional testimony?
mwalsh wrote:
Are tweets the same type of thing as congressional testimony?
Well...is a lie any less of a lie if it is told while not under oath? If someone is caught lying, no matter what the circumstances, it leads one to believe that the liar is dishonest and cannot be trusted. If it is
intentionally told while the liar is under oath, then it should be punishable according to protocol.
I think people tend to forget about how advanced technology is becoming and how easy it is to get caught with their proverbial pants down.
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
FlyingTiger wrote:
Okay Lefties, we are waiting for your chorus of ca... (
show quote)
How about this asshole......
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.