Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Back up camera
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
Feb 23, 2017 13:04:02   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
catchlight.. wrote:
I am curious why anyone would need a "back up" camera especially when the main camera in some cases is described as lesser model and the back up is described as a a middle grade camera.

The failure rate has to be extremely low for most DLS'Rs today and I wonder why anyone would have money sitting in a bag that could have been spent on a better body or lens?

I carry extra batteries and cards and have never had a falure. I have little fear of a problems that would end the shoot.

I sold a MKiii because it just sat in the bag and did not offer the same image quality as the 4.

I can see having two top quality bodies to accommodate two lenses but...


Maybe others have had issues or see a need?
I am curious why anyone would need a "back up... (show quote)

I always have at least one back-up camera (5D MII) with me, most times more and I use it/them everytime not just when my main rig would fail!!! I have different lenses on each, so I can just grab another body without having to change lenses all the time!!

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 13:44:10   #
canon Lee
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Without going into a long reply there are many people who want another camera and many who definitely feel the need for a back up camera. Professional photographers earn their money taking pictures. If for whatever reason a camera is dropped and broken or stops working in the middle of a shoot they are basically out of luck and possibly out of future jobs as well if the word gets out that Bob's camera broke right as the bride was walking down the aisle. When people take that once in a lifetime vacation to Europe or Africa many want to have an extra body for a different lens but also as a backup. Imagine that once in a lifetime lion kill and your one camera is not working due to dust.

Dennis
Without going into a long reply there are many peo... (show quote)


Hi Dennis. I agree with you that a second camera for vacations is really not a priority since a good back up today would be an iPAD or iPHONE. As a professional photographer, ( meaning not better than others but I have clients that pay me). Its imperative as you mentioned that I do have backup. Murphy's Law is always active.. LOL..

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 15:29:36   #
catchlight.. Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
 
Does any one have an actual failure that the back up camera saved the day in the last recent years?

What was the issue and camera?

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2017 15:34:14   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
catchlight.. wrote:
Does any one have an actual failure that the back up camera saved the day in the last recent years?

What was the issue and camera?


No actual failure for me. In fact, I have not used my spare tire either,so I'm thinking about leaving that at home with my camera just to make you happy.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 16:08:13   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
My backup camera is also my travel light camera...not that my main body is that large or heavy. It uses the same lenses as my main body, so I usually use it with my pancake lenses to keep the footprint nice and small.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 16:25:31   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
catchlight.. wrote:
I carry extra batteries and cards and have never had a falure. I have little fear of a problems that would end the shoot.

Obviously you never owned an Alpa!

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 17:56:16   #
catchlight.. Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
 
RWR wrote:
Obviously you never owned an Alpa!


Yes it almost seems paranoia and caution takes over if your not hanging two lenses around your neck.

I do wonder what the actual failure rate really is with todays build quality?

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2017 18:02:38   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
I carry 3 bodies with me. They all carry different lenses. If one quits I always have a spare. And having different lenses on different bodies allows me to quickly change focal ranges. That is the primary reason I carry multiple bodies. I've never had a camera fail.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 18:03:15   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
MT Shooter wrote:
It all depends upon your NEEDs...


I disagree. It all depends upon your WALLET.

(but if you're making money with your photos it all depends on what you charge your clients).

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 18:06:51   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
sarge69 wrote:
Would help if you went out like me with family and forgot a battery in the camera.

Sarge69


I always carry a backup battery. Two bodies use the same battery so I only carry one of those.

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 19:20:23   #
Photographer Jim Loc: Rio Vista, CA
 
if I travel across the country to the East Coast to shoot fall foliage and plan to be there for a week I want a second camera body with me just in case my preferred body has some sort of unexpected mishap. I sure don't want to be in a situation where my photo trip can't be a photo trip! I usually take one to three extended trips each year. Having a second camera with me is insurance that my trip won't be ruined due to a camera problem. (I carry a 5D Mkii and 7D for what it's worth)

There are also many occasions where having a second body is quite helpful to me. For example if I'm hiking into the sand dunes in Death Valley I can put different lenses on each body and then just switch back-and-forth as the compositions dictate. No need to risk damage by having to try to change lenses while in the dunes, and I don't miss great shots because I have the wrong lens on my primary body.

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2017 20:06:50   #
Hbuk66 Loc: Oswego, NY
 
My truck has a built in backup camera, so i don't need one...

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 21:30:26   #
catchlight.. Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
 
Photographer Jim wrote:
if I travel across the country to the East Coast to shoot fall foliage and plan to be there for a week I want a second camera body with me just in case my preferred body has some sort of unexpected mishap. I sure don't want to be in a situation where my photo trip can't be a photo trip! I usually take one to three extended trips each year. Having a second camera with me is insurance that my trip won't be ruined due to a camera problem. (I carry a 5D Mkii and 7D for what it's worth)

There are also many occasions where having a second body is quite helpful to me. For example if I'm hiking into the sand dunes in Death Valley I can put different lenses on each body and then just switch back-and-forth as the compositions dictate. No need to risk damage by having to try to change lenses while in the dunes, and I don't miss great shots because I have the wrong lens on my primary body.
if I travel across the country to the East Coast t... (show quote)


...so the use seems to be either an additional lens to reduce changes (that's good) or a left over body with a label.

Again I think an actual failure statistic is missing in the equation. "Back up camera" really means "your second camera"...

How about " back up lens" for that moment when your lens starts to smoke or a "backup camera bag" to when the strap fails?

Interesting that "back up camera" is so commonly the rationale. 🤔

Reply
Feb 24, 2017 00:59:43   #
Photographer Jim Loc: Rio Vista, CA
 
Its not so much a concern about camera failure (although I have had two friends have their 6ds fail when we were on a trip) as much as it is insurance against my own self inflicted mishaps (Once in Montana, I slipped, knocking over my tripod, but was lucky the camera landed on a cushy bed of moss). Yes, at times the backup actually functions as a second camera where I can shoot alternating between the two, but my primary reason for having a "backup" with me is still to avoid the problems of being on an important trip half way across the country and not being able to do the photography I came there for.

Reply
Feb 24, 2017 02:47:25   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
catchlight.. wrote:
I am curious why anyone would need a "back up" camera especially when the main camera in some cases is described as lesser model and the back up is described as a a middle grade camera.

The failure rate has to be extremely low for most DLS'Rs today and I wonder why anyone would have money sitting in a bag that could have been spent on a better body or lens?

I carry extra batteries and cards and have never had a falure. I have little fear of a problems that would end the shoot.

I sold a MKiii because it just sat in the bag and did not offer the same image quality as the 4.

I can see having two top quality bodies to accommodate two lenses but...


Maybe others have had issues or see a need?
I am curious why anyone would need a "back up... (show quote)

I know a local wedding photographer who drove 20-25 miles for a shoot. She had an F5, an F100 and an N65 with her. She ended up shooting the N65 - but only after she and the pastor used crazy glue to reinstall the instant return mirror.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.