Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Nikon D5000 vs D7000 photo quality
Jun 4, 2012 16:54:38 #
I am now using a Nikon D5000 with a Nikkor 18-200 VRII lens. Somewhat new to photography, I have read my manuals and several other books and viewed numerous tutorials, sort of self taught. My question is this: If I took a photo with the D5000 then took the exact same photo with a D7000 using the exact same settings, with the same exact lens, would I have a better photo with the D7000 or not. Just curious as to your thoughts on this. I do not have a D7000; however, I am contemplating waiting until the D7100 comes out and if in your professional and amateur opinions, the results of the D7000 were better it would help me be convinced to get the D7100.
Jun 4, 2012 17:57:06 #
D5000 VS D7000
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_D5000-vs-Nikon_D7000
Reasons to buy the Nikon D7000: Great image quality
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_D5000-vs-Nikon_D7000
Reasons to buy the Nikon D7000: Great image quality
Jun 4, 2012 18:05:36 #
The D5000 has a 12.2 Mb sensor;
The D7000 has a 16.1 Mb sensor.
You will see a slight difference only in extreme cropping.
The D7000 has a 16.1 Mb sensor.
You will see a slight difference only in extreme cropping.
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Jun 4, 2012 18:08:43 #
cspear42 wrote:
I am now using a Nikon D5000 with a Nikkor 18-200 ... (show quote)
There is a lot more to a camera than just the image it produces. I know, that sounds ridiculous, but it's true. You have to consider durability, weather proofing, controls, weight, feel, and many other things. I have links to reviews listed below.
Camera Reviews
kenrockwell.com
dpreview.com
snapsort.com
http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment.html
Jun 4, 2012 18:16:59 #
I appreciate and respect your responses. I understand most of what you say; I have just not seen this specific of a question asked and was just curious about the sharpness of the photos while comparing the exact settings just using different cameras. I do a lot of cropping so that would mean something to me. Again, thank you for your valued opinions.
Jun 4, 2012 19:17:15 #
cspear42 wrote:
It would depend on what you were taking a photo of and how closely you looked at the photo. ... My question is this: If I took a photo with the D5000 then took the exact same photo with a D7000 using the exact same settings, with the same exact lens, would I have a better photo with the D7000 or not.
Simple answer: No, you would not have a better photo. But you will have one that can be cropped more and enlarged more.
It is NOT the camera, but the eye and mind behind it that makes almost all of the notable difference.
Jun 4, 2012 19:36:26 #
Festina Lente wrote:
quote=cspear42 ... My question is this: If I to... (show quote)
I agree, but I think you missed the part where I said taking the exact same photo with the exact same lens and the exact same settings. Other than the cropping factor would there be a distinguishable difference in the two photos?
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Jun 4, 2012 21:43:35 #
cspear42 wrote:
No, I did not miss that part, which is why I kept that part of your message at the top. quote=Festina Lente quote=cspear42 ... My quest... (show quote)
Again, depending on the subject and lighting and all other things being equal, it is unlikely you will see a distinguishable difference between the two photos.
But you said you did a lot of cropping.... the higher MP count in the D7000 favors you there.
Jun 4, 2012 22:14:16 #
Festina Lente wrote:
quote=cspear42 quote=Festina Lente quote=cspear... (show quote)
Thank you for your thoughts. So, other than cropping, between these two cameras there will be no significant difference in actual photos. Would this hold true for even better cameras, i.e., D800, D4, etc, assuming one would use the same type lens and settings.
Jun 4, 2012 22:51:37 #
Wabbit
Loc: Arizona Desert
cspear42 wrote:
I am now using a Nikon D5000 with a Nikkor 18-200 ... (show quote)
Hey Doc ..... there would probably be a difference because the two sensors are different.
If you did your test with a D5100 and a D7000 both pictures should be identical.
Jun 5, 2012 06:01:40 #
Leonardo
Loc: The Garden of England
It depends what the picture is, I would say. In bright light, you may notice no difference, but in low light you may well notice a major difference.
I tried this with my Sony A230 vs A580. In low light there is an incredible difference. The A580 produces cleaner, sharper pictures every time. In normal light, the images are much the same, but the A580 seems sharper.
(Note, the A230 is CCD, the A580 CMOS, so there are technical differences between the two. Such a difference may not exist on the Nikons.)
I tried this with my Sony A230 vs A580. In low light there is an incredible difference. The A580 produces cleaner, sharper pictures every time. In normal light, the images are much the same, but the A580 seems sharper.
(Note, the A230 is CCD, the A580 CMOS, so there are technical differences between the two. Such a difference may not exist on the Nikons.)
Jun 5, 2012 06:15:10 #
cspear42 wrote:
I am now using a Nikon D5000 with a Nikkor 18-200 ... (show quote)
The D7000 will reveal greater detail at larger print sizes as it has more pixels. It has a wider dynamic range, so depending on the scene, it may give a better image.
The key differences between the bodies are the build, weather sealing, layout of controls and ergonomics. I've seen pros take outstanding shots with point and shoot compacts - it's rarely about the camera. 'Better' cameras enable shots to be taken in more difficult conditions, and allow faster changes of settings that reduce the chances of 'missing the shot'.
A better camera doesn't make you a better photographer, though. Learn the ins and outs of your current camera until you can use it 'blindfolded'. When your ability exceeds the capability of the camera, then is the time for an upgrade.....
Jun 5, 2012 06:50:02 #
Festina Lente wrote:
It is NOT the camera, but the eye and mind behind it that makes almost all of the notable difference.
It is NOT the camera, but the eye and mind behind it that makes almost all of the notable difference.
Absolutely. I have a DSLR and a P&S - I need to look at the EXIF data of my older photos as I can't tell the difference, even when zooming in.
Lorri.
Jun 5, 2012 07:07:01 #
Answer to first question 5000 vs 7000: no except under extreme conditions as discussed above.
Answer to second question 5000 vs 800 or D4: absolutely - 5000 and 7000 are DX whereas 800 and D4 are full frame. Using a DX lens on a FF camera is a big waste of money, at least to me. Different sensors, larger pixels, in fact just everything different. Will let others discuss the technical aspects.
Answer to second question 5000 vs 800 or D4: absolutely - 5000 and 7000 are DX whereas 800 and D4 are full frame. Using a DX lens on a FF camera is a big waste of money, at least to me. Different sensors, larger pixels, in fact just everything different. Will let others discuss the technical aspects.
Jun 5, 2012 08:57:33 #
D7000 would definitely get you sharper quality images, depending on the subject is sometimes more noticeable than other times. You also get better contrast handling. Many of my friend started with the D5000, then moved to the D7000 once they saw my image quality right from the camera. I eventually moved up to the full frame D800, and apart from the event better sharpness and even better contrast handling, it made way better shots that needed little to no post adjustments.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.