Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Post-Processing Digital Images
Replacement of background
Feb 18, 2017 10:42:32   #
Howard5252 Loc: New York / Florida (now)
 
The original background just was not up to the beauty of this horse, so ....

ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL...

IMPROVED BACKGROUND
IMPROVED BACKGROUND...

Reply
Feb 18, 2017 10:49:13   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
Very well done.

Reply
Feb 18, 2017 10:53:04   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
Howard5252 wrote:
The original background just was not up to the beauty of this horse, so ....


Outstanding Image and Post Processing of new background. Make the horse pop.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2017 10:54:29   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Good work! I would enjoy knowing a little more about your tools and techniques!

Reply
Feb 18, 2017 12:02:48   #
Howard5252 Loc: New York / Florida (now)
 
bsprague wrote:
Good work! I would enjoy knowing a little more about your tools and techniques!


I use either TOPAZ Remask or ON1 to make a mask. I keep a folder titled "Peripheral Stuff" and in this folder
I have photos I took of bushes, the sky, clouds, bricks, etc. to be used as backgrounds. The background I chose
for the horse is shown here ... I blurred it before placing the horse in front of it.



Reply
Feb 18, 2017 13:01:23   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Howard5252 wrote:
I use either TOPAZ Remask or ON1 to make a mask. I keep a folder titled "Peripheral Stuff" and in this folder
I have photos I took of bushes, the sky, clouds, bricks, etc. to be used as backgrounds. The background I chose
for the horse is shown here ... I blurred it before placing the horse in front of it.

Thank you!

With the Lightroom subscription, Photoshop is "free". I've been having some fun learning it and did buy the TOPAZ kit when it was on a sale price. Masking, Remask and Photoshop selections are amazing to this old wet darkroom practitioner!

Digital imaging is so full of creative opportunities that new challenges show up faster than my learning rate.

Reply
Feb 18, 2017 21:59:39   #
Jim-Pops Loc: Granbury, Texas
 
Howard5252 wrote:
The original background just was not up to the beauty of this horse, so ....


Make it a much better photograph.

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2017 04:36:02   #
Linary Loc: UK
 
Howard5252 wrote:
The original background just was not up to the beauty of this horse, so ....


Good job - I guess this is the photo you referred to in Rong...'s thread re selections.

The only criticism I have is the missing flying hair on the top of the horses neck. I get the same problems (as do many) with hair, and am trying to find a way of selecting them cleanly. I tried on your original, and achieved a little, but the image being a thumbnail is just too small for fine work.

If you are interested I would like to try but would like an image with "store Original" checked, that should give enough pixels to either prove I can select the hair or prove I can't.

Reply
Feb 19, 2017 06:33:52   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 

Reply
Feb 19, 2017 07:53:30   #
JoeB Loc: Mohawk Valley, NY
 
Very nice!

Reply
Feb 19, 2017 09:22:58   #
slynn Loc: poland ohio
 
Howard5252 wrote:
The original background just was not up to the beauty of this horse, so ....

Good job.

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2017 11:21:01   #
stonecherub Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
A word of warning - when you replace a background, be careful that you do not "cross" the light.

Look at the rider's left hand on the far right edges of the two images above. His index finger shadow on the blanket fold shows that the sun was high over the photographer's right shoulder, nearly behind him. If the light on the transferred background is not from nearly the same position, it won't look right. The picture will be disturbing but you won't know exactly why.

I found this out the hard way, years ago when Photoshop was first ported to Windows. I replaced bad backgrounds on some gravestone photographs and, even though I had de-focused the hedges I used, they just looked wrong. The light direction was different in foreground and background.

Reply
Feb 19, 2017 14:40:34   #
Howard5252 Loc: New York / Florida (now)
 
stonecherub wrote:
A word of warning - when you replace a background, be careful that you do not "cross" the light.

Look at the rider's left hand on the far right edges of the two images above. His index finger shadow on the blanket fold shows that the sun was high over the photographer's right shoulder, nearly behind him. If the light on the transferred background is not from nearly the same position, it won't look right. The picture will be disturbing but you won't know exactly why.

I found this out the hard way, years ago when Photoshop was first ported to Windows. I replaced bad backgrounds on some gravestone photographs and, even though I had de-focused the hedges I used, they just looked wrong. The light direction was different in foreground and background.
A word of warning - when you replace a background,... (show quote)

Thank you for your advice ... I always do check the lighting to be sure they match (or come very close).
In this case the blur removes the direction from which it was lit (my opinion).

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 09:18:33   #
sab2101 Loc: Henderson Nv.
 
Beautiful job............Mike

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 20:53:59   #
bobburk3 Loc: Maryland
 
I like the new background. It really makes the horse stand out. Nice job.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Post-Processing Digital Images
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.