angela k wrote:
The cemetery I posted the other day opened in 1729, but grant it, the headstones were basic, yours are very ornate!
Oh there are older ones (Tintagel springs to mind.) :) But they weren't marked with stones. That's a "Modern" thing. :) And people didn't used to bury their dead in public cemeteries until well into the 1700's, most upper classes have crypts on their land.
Kings and Queens are interred inside Westminster Abbey, St George's Chapel Windsor and such.
Bunhill Fields in London has some of the oldest marked graves (1688 is the oldest marker there, I think)
I know of one in the Peak District that has markers dating back to 1666 and has a lot of plague victims buried there.
St. Pancras' age has been debated as long as I can remember, but it is definitely as old as early 4th Century (330AD or thereabouts) but they didn't use stone markers back then.
Iona Abbey in Scotland has ancient markers, well over a thousand years old, but no dates. Nearly all Scottish Kings are buried there, dating back to 858AD.
Whitby (of Dracula fame) is also extremely old, but most nobles were buried inside the chapel. (Can't have the plebs troop across your grave, right?)
They did find one in Somerset, in a cave, not that long ago, which dates back nearly 10,000 years. No markers, obviously. :)
I've been to an old celtic one in Ireland, which also had some very old markers. With most of them you can't decipher the dates anymore, because the elements weathered them so much.
Lots and lots of really old ones in the UK. :) Probably tons more on the continent, but I think most ancient ones wouldn't have any markers at all.
The US is very young in comparison to Europe, in terms of modern civilization, but the Europeans who settled there brought the marker practice with them. The Native Americans obviously wouldn't have used markers, that's a European thing, but I think their burial grounds would be in line with the Somerset one.
I would imagine there are maybe some pioneer markers in places, but I guess they were mostly made of wood and thus vanished through time and elements.
I tend to go and look, take pictures, and later try to find out about the people. It's actually quite interesting and you can learn a lot from such research. :) Though often I don't find anything at all. :/
It's one of the reasons I urge people to print off photographs. To write stuff down on paper, or print off things they want to keep.
We're losing history in this digital age, and it's sad.
Think about it -- 20 years ago we stored a lot of stuff on diskettes. Who still has a disk drive? How many CD's have been lost? DVDs break, computer hard drives fail. We have so much stuff that can go boom at a moment's notice.
One of my most prized possessions are the letters between Paul and myself, from 30 years ago.
In the age of texts and emails -- I wouldn't have that.
Especially when the phone company told me "All texts will be lost" when I had his phone disconnected.
I write in journals. Not often, not a lot...but I do.
So if in a hundred years time, it's "The world according to Silke", then so be it. :)