jimward
Loc: Perth, Western Australia
bcheary wrote:
The madam opened the brothel door to see a rather dignified, well-dressed good looking man in his late 40s or early 50s.
"Can I help you?" she asked.
"I want to see Natalie," the man replied.
"Sir, Natalie is one of our most expensive ladies. Perhaps you would prefer someone else," said the madam.
"No, I must see Natalie" was the man's reply.
Just then, Natalie appeared and announced to the man that she charged $1,000 a visit. Without hesitation, the man pulled out ten one-hundred dollar bills and gave them to Natalie and they went upstairs. After an hour, the man calmly left.
The next night the same man appeared again, demanding to see Natalie. Natalie explained that no one had ever come back two nights in a row-too expensive -- and there were no discounts. The price was still $1,000. Again the man pulled out the money, gave it to Natalie and they went upstairs. After an hour, he left.
The following night the man was there again. Everyone was astounded that he had come for the third consecutive night, but he paid Natalie and they went upstairs. After their session, Natalie questioned the man.
"No one has ever used me three nights in a row. Where are you from?" she asked.
The man replied, "South Carolina."
"Really?" she said. "I have family in South Carolina."
"I know," the man said. "Your father died and I am your sister's attorney. She asked me to give you your $3,000 inheritance."
The madam opened the brothel door to see a rather ... (
show quote)
An oldie but goodie, but the punchline was missing:
Three things are certain in this life - death, taxes, and being screwed by a lawyer.
"I know," the man said. "Your father died and I am your sister's attorney. She asked me to give you your $3,000 inheritance."[/quote]
Funny. However, if this were a real situation, he would still owe her $3000. Unless there were some caveat in the will to such effect, an heir would not have to "earn" their inheritance, regardless of whether or not the fee for services rendered seemed outrageous or not. If this happened in Nevada, where prostitution is legal, she could sue the lawyer in small claims court and have no problem winning the case. Many attorneys charge very high fees, so it may not have been any kind of burden on the scumbag anyway. I hope I have not been a wet blanket with this.
bcheary wrote:
The madam opened the brothel door to see a rather dignified, well-dressed good looking man in his late 40s or early 50s.
"Can I help you?" she asked.
"I want to see Natalie," the man replied.
"Sir, Natalie is one of our most expensive ladies. Perhaps you would prefer someone else," said the madam.
"No, I must see Natalie" was the man's reply.
Just then, Natalie appeared and announced to the man that she charged $1,000 a visit. Without hesitation, the man pulled out ten one-hundred dollar bills and gave them to Natalie and they went upstairs. After an hour, the man calmly left.
The next night the same man appeared again, demanding to see Natalie. Natalie explained that no one had ever come back two nights in a row-too expensive -- and there were no discounts. The price was still $1,000. Again the man pulled out the money, gave it to Natalie and they went upstairs. After an hour, he left.
The following night the man was there again. Everyone was astounded that he had come for the third consecutive night, but he paid Natalie and they went upstairs. After their session, Natalie questioned the man.
"No one has ever used me three nights in a row. Where are you from?" she asked.
The man replied, "South Carolina."
"Really?" she said. "I have family in South Carolina."
"I know," the man said. "Your father died and I am your sister's attorney. She asked me to give you your $3,000 inheritance."
The madam opened the brothel door to see a rather ... (
show quote)
Whats the name of an attorney in a shooting range ?
A Target !
salmander wrote:
"I know," the man said. "Your father died and I am your sister's attorney. She asked me to give you your $3,000 inheritance."
Funny. However, if this were a real situation, he would still owe her $3000. Unless there were some caveat in the will to such effect, an heir would not have to "earn" their inheritance, regardless of whether or not the fee for services rendered seemed outrageous or not. If this happened in Nevada, where prostitution is legal, she could sue the lawyer in small claims court and have no problem winning the case. Many attorneys charge very high fees, so it may not have been any kind of burden on the scumbag anyway. I hope I have not been a wet blanket with this.[/quote]
Damn there is always one who has to ruin a good story!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.