Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Logs of Wood
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jan 16, 2017 05:59:49   #
Leicaflex Loc: Cymru
 
In the dark days of winter it is comforting to feel the warmth of crackling logs in an open fireplace or a wood burner.


What could be friendlier to the planet than using a renewable resource such as wood?


Unfortunately, the fumes from wood fires carry microscopic particles of soot.


Particles known as PM2.5 are possibly one of the most dangerous air pollution health hazards.



Even though a minority of UK households use wood fires 7.5 per cent of the population the pollution
from these particles are estimated to be more than double that from UK's diesel cars, buses and lorries.

Even a single log burning stove emits more PM2.5 particles than 1,000 petrol cars each year.

Previous studies have suggested that wood smoke can enter neighbouring homes, even if wood is burnt in
modern stoves rather than open fires. Simply starting the fire, stoking it and reloading the burner can give off sooty particles.



The department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) issues warnings of high air pollution
from noxious gases, yet only issues "notifications" of high particle levels.



Defra's recent annual report on air pollution admitted that the UK was in breach of international limits for pollutants.
It also revealed that particle pollution is increasing, with levels of most other air pollutants are falling.



The health risks from PM2.5 are especially worrying because these particles are so small that they can easily
be breathed deep into the lungs, which can lead to health issues such as asthma, lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases.



In addition to health problems, these particles trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to climate change.



It is a myth that wood burning is environmentally friendly. There needs to be a public awareness campaign of the
dangers from wood burning, in the same way that the hazards of diesel car pollution have received a great deal of publicity.

http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 06:08:16   #
whitewolfowner
 
Leicaflex wrote:
In the dark days of winter it is comforting to feel the warmth of crackling logs in an open fireplace or a wood burner.


What could be friendlier to the planet than using a renewable resource such as wood?


Unfortunately, the fumes from wood fires carry microscopic particles of soot.


Particles known as PM2.5 are possibly one of the most dangerous air pollution health hazards.



Even though a minority of UK households use wood fires 7.5 per cent of the population the pollution
from these particles are estimated to be more than double that from UK's diesel cars, buses and lorries.

Even a single log burning stove emits more PM2.5 particles than 1,000 petrol cars each year.

Previous studies have suggested that wood smoke can enter neighbouring homes, even if wood is burnt in
modern stoves rather than open fires. Simply starting the fire, stoking it and reloading the burner can give off sooty particles.



The department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) issues warnings of high air pollution
from noxious gases, yet only issues "notifications" of high particle levels.



Defra's recent annual report on air pollution admitted that the UK was in breach of international limits for pollutants.
It also revealed that particle pollution is increasing, with levels of most other air pollutants are falling.



The health risks from PM2.5 are especially worrying because these particles are so small that they can easily
be breathed deep into the lungs, which can lead to health issues such as asthma, lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases.



In addition to health problems, these particles trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to climate change.



It is a myth that wood burning is environmentally friendly. There needs to be a public awareness campaign of the
dangers from wood burning, in the same way that the hazards of diesel car pollution have received a great deal of publicity.

http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm
In the dark days of winter it is comforting to fee... (show quote)



If this was true, a forest fire would wipe out the planet. What idiot wrote that?

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 06:40:29   #
ken hubert Loc: Missouri
 
whitewolfowner wrote:
If this was true, a forest fire would wipe out the planet. What idiot wrote that?


A Libturd of course.

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2017 06:58:04   #
whitewolfowner
 
ken hubert wrote:
A Libturd of course.




I know all too well but didn't want to start a war. They just don't know when to quit whining!

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 07:55:58   #
Sirsnapalot Loc: Hammond, Louisiana
 
whitewolfowner wrote:
If this was true, a forest fire would wipe out the planet. What idiot wrote that?



The sky is falling, the sky is falling!! More BS from the left!

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 08:00:38   #
bluescreek Loc: N.C. Sandhills
 
I have a wood fire every weekend of the winter on my deck, helps keep the liberals away, I reckon.

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 08:02:07   #
paulrph1 Loc: Washington, Utah
 
Leicaflex wrote:
In the dark days of winter it is comforting to feel the warmth of crackling logs in an open fireplace or a wood burner.


What could be friendlier to the planet than using a renewable resource such as wood?


Unfortunately, the fumes from wood fires carry microscopic particles of soot.


Particles known as PM2.5 are possibly one of the most dangerous air pollution health hazards.



Even though a minority of UK households use wood fires 7.5 per cent of the population the pollution
from these particles are estimated to be more than double that from UK's diesel cars, buses and lorries.

Even a single log burning stove emits more PM2.5 particles than 1,000 petrol cars each year.

Previous studies have suggested that wood smoke can enter neighbouring homes, even if wood is burnt in
modern stoves rather than open fires. Simply starting the fire, stoking it and reloading the burner can give off sooty particles.



The department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) issues warnings of high air pollution
from noxious gases, yet only issues "notifications" of high particle levels.



Defra's recent annual report on air pollution admitted that the UK was in breach of international limits for pollutants.
It also revealed that particle pollution is increasing, with levels of most other air pollutants are falling.



The health risks from PM2.5 are especially worrying because these particles are so small that they can easily
be breathed deep into the lungs, which can lead to health issues such as asthma, lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases.



In addition to health problems, these particles trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to climate change.



It is a myth that wood burning is environmentally friendly. There needs to be a public awareness campaign of the
dangers from wood burning, in the same way that the hazards of diesel car pollution have received a great deal of publicity.

http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm
In the dark days of winter it is comforting to fee... (show quote)

I hate generalizations. If they are go to do a study and publish it should be done on a stove by stove basis and not try to lump them all in the same. Have they done the same study on coke? Some one thinks they need an agenda and goes for it. From what I know very few use wood but many use coke for the winter heat.

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2017 08:06:07   #
fourg1b2006 Loc: Long Island New York
 
People have been burning wood from the beginning of time. I don't recall ever hearing that someone died from soot on their lungs..... give me a break.

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 08:13:12   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Leicaflex wrote:
In the dark days of winter it is comforting to feel the warmth of crackling logs in an open fireplace or a wood burner.


What could be friendlier to the planet than using a renewable resource such as wood?


Unfortunately, the fumes from wood fires carry microscopic particles of soot.


Particles known as PM2.5 are possibly one of the most dangerous air pollution health hazards.



Even though a minority of UK households use wood fires 7.5 per cent of the population the pollution
from these particles are estimated to be more than double that from UK's diesel cars, buses and lorries.

Even a single log burning stove emits more PM2.5 particles than 1,000 petrol cars each year.

Previous studies have suggested that wood smoke can enter neighbouring homes, even if wood is burnt in
modern stoves rather than open fires. Simply starting the fire, stoking it and reloading the burner can give off sooty particles.



The department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) issues warnings of high air pollution
from noxious gases, yet only issues "notifications" of high particle levels.



Defra's recent annual report on air pollution admitted that the UK was in breach of international limits for pollutants.
It also revealed that particle pollution is increasing, with levels of most other air pollutants are falling.



The health risks from PM2.5 are especially worrying because these particles are so small that they can easily
be breathed deep into the lungs, which can lead to health issues such as asthma, lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases.



In addition to health problems, these particles trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to climate change.



It is a myth that wood burning is environmentally friendly. There needs to be a public awareness campaign of the
dangers from wood burning, in the same way that the hazards of diesel car pollution have received a great deal of publicity.

http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm
In the dark days of winter it is comforting to fee... (show quote)


I'm going to assume this was written as a joke. No one could be that stupid. Oh wait, I forgot about Al Gore.

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 08:30:45   #
jim quist Loc: Missouri
 
If I survived the fireplace growing up then I guess I can survive any air born toxin.

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 09:31:47   #
sarge69 Loc: Ft Myers, FL
 
I demand equal time in evaluating the negative effects of a burrito fart.

Sarge69

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2017 10:05:52   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
sarge69 wrote:
I demand equal time in evaluating the negative effects of a burrito fart.

Sarge69


You can probably get a government grant to study that but you need to hurry before Barack "10 Trillion $ Deficit" Obama leaves office. The next administration might not be so accommodating.

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 15:26:04   #
whitewolfowner
 
leftj wrote:
I'm going to assume this was written as a joke. No one could be that stupid. Oh wait, I forgot about Al Gore.



And all his crony followers. Remember, he got the nobel peace prize. I had a good raunchy fart the other day and sent it to the middle east in a bottle. I'll be applying for the nobel peace prize for next year for my efforts towards peace. Remember to vote for me!

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 15:26:40   #
whitewolfowner
 
sarge69 wrote:
I demand equal time in evaluating the negative effects of a burrito fart.

Sarge69





Reply
Jan 16, 2017 15:55:50   #
Earworms Loc: Sacramento, California
 
whitewolfowner wrote:
I had a good raunchy fart the other day. . . .
I'm sure there are plenty more where that one came from.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.