Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Copyright date
Jan 5, 2017 08:15:22   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
I don't bother with it myself, as my photos are not for sale and are given only to a select few.
But if you have a copyright date embedded in your camera's info, or in any of the software you use to PP your photos, you need to change it 2017, if you have not already done so.

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 09:47:15   #
Dr.Nikon Loc: Honolulu Hawaii
 
Yep ...

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 11:55:25   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Morning Star wrote:
I don't bother with it myself, as my photos are not for sale and are given only to a select few.
But if you have a copyright date embedded in your camera's info, or in any of the software you use to PP your photos, you need to change it 2017, if you have not already done so.

My camera does that automatically!

Reply
 
 
Jan 5, 2017 13:45:15   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
speters wrote:
My camera does that automatically!


Great! What about your PP software?

Like I said, for myself, I don't bother, if I need a date, I totally rely on the date in the exif data.
The date in the exif data is set automatically by my camera as well.
For copyright information, I have to manually enter the copyright sign, the year and my name.

Reply
Jan 6, 2017 00:23:37   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Morning Star wrote:
I don't bother with it myself, as my photos are not for sale and are given only to a select few.
But if you have a copyright date embedded in your camera's info, or in any of the software you use to PP your photos, you need to change it 2017, if you have not already done so.

Only if you are working on new photos. If you choose to add a copyright date to a photo (under US copyright, the addition of which is optional), it must be the original date. Do NOT allow your software to add a 2017 copyright date to an earlier image.

Reply
Mar 1, 2017 17:35:30   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Morning Star wrote:
Great! What about your PP software?

Like I said, for myself, I don't bother, if I need a date, I totally rely on the date in the exif data.
The date in the exif data is set automatically by my camera as well.
For copyright information, I have to manually enter the copyright sign, the year and my name.

It shows up already updated in any software program (I don't have to do a thing)!

Reply
Mar 1, 2017 19:08:44   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
BHC wrote:
Only if you are working on new photos. If you choose to add a copyright date to a photo (under US copyright, the addition of which is optional), it must be the original date. Do NOT allow your software to add a 2017 copyright date to an earlier image.


Not being a copyright lawyer, I could easily be off base
but I would think that if you edit a photo it becomes a derivative work and copyrightable as of the date of the edit.
Would appreciate some knowledgeable commentary.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2017 20:18:22   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
Not being a copyright lawyer, I could easily be off base
but I would think that if you edit a photo it becomes a derivative work and copyrightable as of the date of the edit.
Would appreciate some knowledgeable commentary.

Good reading for all:

http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdf

Note in particular:

1. "Only the owner of copyright in a work has the right to pre- pare, or to authorize someone else to create, an adaptation of that work."

2. "The copyright in a derivative work covers only the additions, changes, or other new material appearing for the first time in the work."

As an interesting side note, one does not need to be a law school graduate, a licensed attorney or a member of the bar to offer an educated opinion or even to practice law in some courts. Abraham Lincoln was a licensed attorney and a member of the Illinois Bar, even though he NEVER attended law school. He had less than twelve months of formal education!

Reply
Mar 1, 2017 21:33:42   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Thanks for the link.

BHC wrote:
..2. "The copyright in a derivative work covers only the additions, changes, or other new material appearing for the first time in the work."...


Interesting. So if your camera produces a raw file with copyright information, and you consequently postprocess that file, then you have two copyrights? One for the original raw file and one for the differences expressed in the postprocessed image?

Or does "appearing for the first time" mean publication?

I suppose if an image is never published there would be no danger of copyright infringement.

Not bring skilled in the law, all the above is purely speculation on my part.

Reply
Mar 2, 2017 02:10:27   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
Thanks for the link.



Interesting. So if your camera produces a raw file with copyright information, and you consequently postprocess that file, then you have two copyrights? One for the original raw file and one for the differences expressed in the postprocessed image?

Or does "appearing for the first time" mean publication?

I suppose if an image is never published there would be no danger of copyright infringement.

Not bring skilled in the law, all the above is purely speculation on my part.
Thanks for the link. br br br br Interesting. S... (show quote)

Good point. In the past, my eyes (and mind) have "floated over" the concept of publication. Unfortunately the Copyright Law (USC Title 17) seems to minimize the importance of photographic images and provides less detail to their creation and coverage than other works such as literary or musical works - or even sculptures. One question that comes to mind is this. When does the author of a work consider it to have been "created?" If I write a book and it goes to the publisher, and, at the last second, decide to add a chapter to the book, was it created when I sent it to the publisher or after I have "signed off" on the printed copy? Was each chapter created separately (of course not)? If I press the shutter release on my camera, is the image created when the shutter closes or when I save the post processed RAW file as a TIF? And what happens when I look at it the next day and realize that I have to edit out a power line? Remember, nobody even knows the image exists except me. What if I have saved the file every 1/2 hour as a separate file. Is each a derivative of the last? How many copyrights can I have? And, if we're not confused enough already, look below:

https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq-definitions.html

https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/definitions.html

https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/bclt_IPSC2010_Gerhardt(2).pdf

Wow! 34 years, 9 months and 25 days. I'd have never made it this far if I was practicing law like my dad wanted me to! Pour me three fingers of Single Malt!

Reply
Mar 2, 2017 07:58:06   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
BHC wrote:
...Wow! 34 years, 9 months and 25 days. I'd have never made it this far if I was practicing law like my dad wanted me to! Pour me three fingers of Single Malt!


Since I'm now 77 and a few months, does that entitle me to 6 fingers of single malt?

Reply
 
 
Mar 2, 2017 18:09:27   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
Since I'm now 77 and a few months, does that entitle me to 6 fingers of single malt?

Are you referring to age?

Reply
Mar 2, 2017 18:15:42   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
BHC wrote:
Are you referring to age?


Well, I never made it to that height (in inches, anyway)

Reply
Mar 2, 2017 23:43:55   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
Well, I never made it to that height (in inches, anyway)

Six fingers is OK, but why not just fill up the glass?

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.