phcaan wrote:
A non sequitur as usual, go back to picking you banjo.
Not a non sequitur at all, just advice.
richard-sports wrote:
My side lost because of some antiquated law.
Millions more said no to Trump than said yes to Trump.
Most Americans did not want to see a sexual predator with the impulse control of a 12 year old in the White House.
The resistance lives.
And the woman you refer to as a criminal was investigated by nine different Republican committees and they found nothing criminal.
Wait until the con man is in the WH for a while.
He has already bled $12 million out of the American treasury.
Antiquated law? Whatever. It would take a Constitutional Amendment to change it.....which would require not only passage in Congress but passage by 2/3rds of the states....wotsa ruck. Don't forget, the number of electors are based upon population. Also, nowhere in the Constitution is an election by popular vote mentioned. In fact, Article II mentions that electors are to be selected by whatever manner the legislature (of the states) chooses. It doesn't specifically state that they were to be selected by election.
And that criminal we talk about....lied to the FBI....same as Martha Stewart who ended up in prison for the same offense.
As far as the sexual predator with the impulse control of a 12 year old.....he was almost our First Man
Bled $12 million out of the treasury? I'm sure you're complaining about security. Hmmm.....I wonder how much Obama's Hawaaian vacation will cost the taxpayers, not to speak of Michelle's jaunt to Europe with the girls a few years ago.
SteveR wrote:
Antiquated law? Whatever. It would take a Constitutional Amendment to change it.....which would require not only passage in Congress but passage by 2/3rds of the states....wotsa ruck.
As far as the sexual predator with the impulse control of a 12 year old.....he was almost our First Man.
Bled $12 million out of the treasury? I'm sure you're complaining about security. Hmmm.....I wonder how much Obama's Hawaaian vacation will cost the taxpayers.
Richard said "antiquated law", told ya Liberals hate the Constitution :)
phcaan wrote:
Like I thought, no answer.
You expect less from Texcaster. And you get it.
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
ken hubert wrote:
You expect less from Texcaster. And you get it.
Tex was not who I asked, Keenan was who I asked, his boy tex jumped in to stick up for pony.
I got no answer from Keenan.
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
phcaan wrote:
Tex was not who I asked, Keenan was who I asked, his boy tex jumped in to stick up for pony.
I got no answer from Keenan.
You already got may answer multiple times. Do you think if you keep asking the same question over and over that you will eventually get a different answer?
What's up with you right wingers and your obsession with homosexuality and gay sex?
Have you been this way all your life, or did you pick up this behavior from your creepy perverted right wing buddies?
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
Keenan wrote:
You already got may answer multiple times. Do you think if you keep asking the same question over and over that you will eventually get a different answer?
What's up with you right wingers and your obsession with homosexuality and gay sex?
Have you been this way all your life, or did you pick up this behavior from your creepy perverted right wing buddies?
Blah. blah, blah, blah, and more diversion. So what answer have you given out so many times? You spend so much time attempting to shame or mock anyone who questions you particular perversion, so what is it big man?
phcaan wrote:
Blah. blah, blah, blah, and more diversion. So what answer have you given out so many times? You spend so much time attempting to shame or mock anyone who questions you particular perversion, so what is it big man?
He's waiting for his boyfriend to jump in again and save him.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.