Mulling the value of 16-300 mm lens
Dec 9, 2016 09:48:40 #
I've used the Tamron 16-300 on my Canon 70D with very good results. I've never used an equivalent Canon lens on it so no basis for comparison, but I do have a FF camera, with Canon glass. The Tamron combination, while maybe a bit softer and slower, performs admirably for a walk around.
Dec 9, 2016 10:04:36 #
dsnoke wrote:
Hi everyone, br br I've now got the Tokina 11-16 ... (show quote)
18-300mm is a good choice, but there are times when a good 50mm f1.4 or 1.7 or even a 28-70mm f2.8 make things happen.
Dec 9, 2016 11:33:38 #
NJphotodoc
Loc: Now in the First State
I have the Tamron 160300 on my D7200 an d previously had it on my D7000. Personally I like it but I do find some small issues that are bothersome i.e don't lean forward or the lens will go out all the way. I would think that if have a reliable camera store near you, try various lenses on your camera (Nikon, Tamron, Sigma) and see how they feel to you. That's the real "test drive"
Dec 9, 2016 11:50:29 #
dsnoke wrote:
Hi everyone, br br I've now got the Tokina 11-16 ... (show quote)
Get a D5300 and take the same images with half the weight. Plus the articulated screen is a knee saver for flowers.
Dec 9, 2016 12:43:24 #
gvarner
Loc: Central Oregon Coast
I fiber tripod slung over the back might not be too burdensome. Then you could set up a pano with the 55-300 for those wide shots. No limit to how much you can take in. Just a thought. For the 55mm, hold your thumb out at arm's length and your field of view for vertical would be about 14", for horizontal about 21". You could then gauge about how many shots you'd have to stitch together.
Dec 9, 2016 14:32:44 #
I have exactly 0 experience with either of the lenses you are considering. But, when hiking, both the camera and the mounted lens needs to be easy to swing and shoot. The plus for the Tamron 16-300mm is the fact Tamron warranties their lenses for 6 year. That is a real plus for any lens that will be used while hiking. Just send it in to Tamron if and when the lens may become soft. This will mean a internal lens may need adjustment or replacement. I do shoot with 3 Tamron lenses, 18-270mm for hiking with a cropped frame, Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC, and the Tamron SP 150-600mm lenses. So, take a close look at warranty repairs, and possible costs that can mount when the warranty runs out.
B
B
Dec 10, 2016 05:42:22 #
Dec 10, 2016 05:51:47 #
I have one of the older 18-270's on my Canon 7dmkii that I use for a hiking lens. Ever since I micro adjusted it, I find the quality very good with this lens. Since I am a hiker/backpacker, weight is something I pay close attention to. I would try both, but now, I would probably lean towards the Sigma since they can be adjusted via USB.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.