ken hubert Loc: Missouri

And you are the dunce!
Idiot

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

So you prefer to be deaf, dumb, and blind?

Wellhiem Loc: Sunny England.

I wouldn't claim that anything is proof, until the Earth is incapable of supporting human life. But by that time it would be a bit too late. I would however offer 150 years of records and the opinion of 99% of independent scientists working in the field as pretty good evidence.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

Think he said he did not want to be like that ...

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

I think he did say that

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

What specific 150 year old source are you talking about?

PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas

The major theme of Boberic's posts on UHH is to declare unequivocally that there is no evidence for something that is incontrovertibly proven. Unfailingly, it is some long disproved right wing contention. His last great public pronouncement was the revelation against all fact and reason that Bush II told no lies to stampede the country into war with Iraq. Several UHH members cited proof against this. The right wingers corroborated it with their silence. Without doubt, however, Boberic continues to believe to this day that Bush told no lies to foment his wars. That is why it is not surprising that he would make other statements denying facts and reason. Here he states unequivocally that there is no evidence for man causing global warming.

In fact, a wide array of different kinds of scientists have peer reviewed corroborative data and an overwhelming percentage of them have concluded the cause of the current global warming is the behavior of homo sapiens. Why should anyone listen to them when we have the brilliance of one Boberic and a few dissident crackpot scientists, like Murry Salby?

Judging from the body off his work here, Boberic has never heard of Murray Salby. It is doubtful he knows very much about the actual science of global warming, or global warming denial, for that matter, but he does not have to. There are others of higher intelligence, but similarly lacking in reasoning ability, such as Racmanaz who can more convincingly, albeit speciously carry the technical aspects of the debate for him.

For further support, droves of idiotic right wing shills will cast their votes in favor of Boberic. They think that Like Racmanaz with his insane assaults on the Big Bang Theory, they are the intellectual descendants of Galileo Galilei, bravely opposing the crackpot unscientific conventions of their time. In fact, they are foolishly opposing science with their utterly crackpot unscientific beliefs. Their climate denial serves to protect fossil fuel profits, and the assault on the Big Bang protects Bronze Age creation myths. If they really had a genuine interest in science, by now they would surely have found other scientific discoveries to contradict with their fairytales. If everyone thought like them humans would never have crawled out of caves.

One Rude Dawg Loc: Athol, ID

PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas

The list of muttering maniacs supporting your crackpot statements is growing, Boberic; sheer proof that you must be right. This last one is especially a prize supporter against intellectual lightweights, like Neil DeGrasse Tyson. He is the epitome of class, represented as he is by a picture of a dog urinating.

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

You realize that all of your wisdom means nothing to those who don't believe in what you are selling.

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

PissNiggy, we have a new weight class for you. It's called the pantywaist.

PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas

Wellhiem: I wouldn't claim that anything is proof, until the Earth is incapable of supporting human life. But by that time it would be a bit too late. I would however offer 150 years of records and the opinion of 99% of independent scientists working in the field as pretty good evidence.


ken hubert:What specific 150 year old source are you talking about?


Nagy: If you respond to this, Welheim, be aware that

1. Kenny will claim victory no matter how thoroughly you prove your case. He is impervious to both facts and logic.

2. if you present a thorough, unassailable case, some other lame brain will complain about your voluminous bloviation.

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

Thanks for the free space PissNiggy. I will be subletting space in your head as there is so much available

HEART Loc: God's Country - COLORADO

I could've sworn that if you put all the libs/progressives in a bottle with the lid on tight that all of the farts emitted would create global warming...guess science has to work on the problem of why keep them breathing in the first place??

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

A significant rise in temperature, not the increase of 0.8 degrees C,which is not enough to justify the current warming fraud. And by the way temp. measuring devices were not very accurate 100 years ago, so the rise of even 0.8 degrees in 100 years is suspect.