Full Frame Camera Decision: About to pull the trigger on a Nikon Full frame camera. Just acquired the 14-24 2.8 and now I own the "Nikon Holy Trinity" and have been told that it might...

Goldwing2500 Loc: Powder Springs

About to pull the trigger on a Nikon Full frame camera. Just acquired the 14-24 2.8 and now I own the "Nikon Holy Trinity" and have been told that it might be a good idea to upgrade the camera to match the lenses. Looking at the 610, 750 or 810. Leaning toward the 810. Thoughts anyone? Currently own the D90 for the last 6 years.

Bill Munny Loc: Aurora, Colorado

I went thru this in July, look up this stuff on the "search" area above.

WayneT Loc: Paris, TN

It's really what you want to use it for. I don't think you beat an 810 for landscape photography but you can also save a bit of cash with a 610 or 750. I think between the 610 and 750 I'd go with the 750.

GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City

Love my D810-better than the 800.
If money is not an issue, get it.
Raw files are pretty big, (30+megs) so you may want to look at a computer upgrade.
You get what you pay for.
I would not consider the 610-different build level & interface.

camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.

I bet that using those lenses the results will be the same for each of the cameras you mentioned.

rbfanman

If you can afford it, the 810 would probably be a better choice...more MP, etc. Either the 610, or 750, would make great lower cost compromises. Generally, cut costs in whatever ways you can-buy factory refurbs, shop around Xmas, etc-and then get the most expensive item you can afford from that stable...the factory refurbs available near Xmas, etc. It is better to have too much capability rather than not enough....having features you will never use, rather than lacking features you need on a regular basis.

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Goldwing2500 wrote:

About to pull the trigger on a Nikon Full frame camera. Just acquired the 14-24 2.8 and now I own the "Nikon Holy Trinity" and have been told that it might be a good idea to upgrade the camera to match the lenses. Looking at the 610, 750 or 810. Leaning toward the 810. Thoughts anyone? Currently own the D90 for the last 6 years.

Remember the Df.

GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City

Kmgw9v wrote:

Remember the Df.

Never seen, let alone held one but it looks great.
Link HERE.
Nikon's lightest FX body- can use just about any Nikon lens made.

bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.

Love my D810, no regrets at all, does everything I want and a lot more. I use it for weddings, portraits and my trips into the woods shooting animals.

Dan De Lion Loc: Montana

Goldwing2500 wrote:

About to pull the trigger on a Nikon Full frame camera. Just acquired the 14-24 2.8 and now I own the "Nikon Holy Trinity" and have been told that it might be a good idea to upgrade the camera to match the lenses. Looking at the 610, 750 or 810. Leaning toward the 810. Thoughts anyone? Currently own the D90 for the last 6 years.

-----

All three are fine cameras. If you do a lot of studio work the 810 is the camera to get. You'll need a solid heavy tripod to take advantage of the 36mph sensor. Likewise defraction reduces quality after f8. For an all round body the 750 can't be beat. Think of it as a field camera with a faster frame rate and the very useful U settings. It is also lighter which, with the three lenses you have, makes a difference. When hand held, both take equally sharp pictures.

I'm sure some 810 owners will find the above disturbing, unfortunately I'll be unable to respond to their bellowing. Satellite internet service is spotty and slow in the Red Sea area. I own both an 810 and 2 750s.

-----

bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.

while you guys are using the expensive stuff, i'll have fun with my d-200.

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

I've got both the D700 and D800e. If you were to purchase the 810, you'll be amazed at what that camera can do. Of course, it requires the user to be aware of and capable of using all that camera has to offer.
--Bob

Goldwing2500 wrote:

About to pull the trigger on a Nikon Full frame camera. Just acquired the 14-24 2.8 and now I own the "Nikon Holy Trinity" and have been told that it might be a good idea to upgrade the camera to match the lenses. Looking at the 610, 750 or 810. Leaning toward the 810. Thoughts anyone? Currently own the D90 for the last 6 years.

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

Goldwing2500 wrote:

About to pull the trigger on a Nikon Full frame camera. Just acquired the 14-24 2.8 and now I own the "Nikon Holy Trinity" and have been told that it might be a good idea to upgrade the camera to match the lenses. Looking at the 610, 750 or 810. Leaning toward the 810. Thoughts anyone? Currently own the D90 for the last 6 years.

I never even considered the D800 or D810. I went from D7100 to D600 to D750. It's a great camera.

Read comparisons and specs, and decide what features are important to you.
(Reviews) https://www.youtube.com/user/TheCameraStoreTV/videos
http://cameras.reviewed.com/
http://camerasize.com/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
http://snapsort.com/compare
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/cameras?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=mainmenu&utm_medium=text&ref=mainmenu

rmm0605 Loc: Atlanta GA

Goldwing2500 wrote:

About to pull the trigger on a Nikon Full frame camera. Just acquired the 14-24 2.8 and now I own the "Nikon Holy Trinity" and have been told that it might be a good idea to upgrade the camera to match the lenses. Looking at the 610, 750 or 810. Leaning toward the 810. Thoughts anyone? Currently own the D90 for the last 6 years.

Well, not knowing what you like to shoot (or much of anything else!), you'll find the 810 to be top notch. You can do almost anything with it. I use mine almost exclusively. The 750 is also a great camera and is a more recent model than the 810. It has fewer pixels, but 24m is enough for most everything you'd shoot. It's less expensive and has more presets than the 810. The 810 is a true pro camera.

billnourse Loc: Bloomfield, NM

My choice would be the 750... If you shoot sports at all, the 750 is faster, and image quality is very similar. The 750 is a little lighter and smaller as well.

Bill