There she goes again
Oct 22, 2016 09:12:43 #
Texcaster wrote:
The poor unaware sap even denies he has twin peckers in his avatar.
I don't see any peckers there but hey everybody sees what they want to see. Right Nancy?
Oct 22, 2016 10:32:37 #
ken hubert wrote:
I don't see any peckers there but hey everybody sees what they want to see. Right Nancy?
So,it's true? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder?
Oct 22, 2016 10:33:51 #
DaveO wrote:
So,it's true? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder?
I reckon so. He sees peckers everywhere. He should get together with Nekkh.
Oct 22, 2016 17:38:50 #
DaveO wrote:
So,it's true? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder?
Indeed Dave, truer words have never spoken. We are all drawn to images of things we like on both a conscious and subliminal level. That the most vociferous gay finger pointer here would choose this image is a textbook advertising industry joke. Hubert might not know much about spaceships or advertising but he knows what he likes. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Oct 22, 2016 18:39:19 #
Texcaster wrote:
Indeed Dave, truer words have never spoken. We are all drawn to images of things we like on both a conscious and subliminal level. That the most vociferous gay finger pointer here would choose this image is a textbook advertising industry joke. Hubert might not know much about spaceships or advertising but he knows what he likes. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
You're the one that sees peckers there, not me, perv.
Oct 22, 2016 18:44:18 #
ken hubert wrote:
You're the one that sees peckers there, not me, perv.
Of course you don't, that's the joke.
Oct 22, 2016 18:47:07 #
ken hubert wrote:
You're the one that sees peckers there, not me, perv.
Of course you see them, they hot pink on the tips...your fave color...
LOL
Oct 22, 2016 20:22:56 #
mwalsh wrote:
Of course you see them, they hot pink on the tips...your fave color...
LOL
LOL
Who? Not me.
Oct 23, 2016 06:40:22 #
Oct 23, 2016 06:45:29 #
ken hubert wrote:
Who? Not me.
"Who? Not me."
The poignant whimper of a very confused fuckwit. Almost as humiliating as Richard Nixon's ... "I'm not a crook." Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Oct 23, 2016 06:48:56 #
Oct 23, 2016 09:30:33 #
Texcaster wrote:
"Who? Not me."
The poignant whimper of a very confused fuckwit. Almost as humiliating as Richard Nixon's ... "I'm not a crook." Not that there's anything wrong with that.
The poignant whimper of a very confused fuckwit. Almost as humiliating as Richard Nixon's ... "I'm not a crook." Not that there's anything wrong with that.
The only fuckwits is yourself. Not our fault you can't satisfy your old lady
Oct 23, 2016 15:01:12 #
ken hubert wrote:
The only fuckwits is yourself. Not our fault you can't satisfy your old lady
"OUR"? No gay slurs? Interesting. I'll be busy the next three days but carry on as usual. Peckers Aweigh! Straight ahead! Fast lane only!
Oct 23, 2016 18:39:59 #
Texcaster wrote:
"OUR"? No gay slurs? Interesting. I'll be busy the next three days but carry on as usual. Peckers Aweigh! Straight ahead! Fast lane only!
On your way to Bangkok to see the 'boys'?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.