Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
New Lens-Sharpness Issue
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 21, 2012 11:23:13   #
clixpix Loc: Surprise, Arizona
 
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens to replace my 100-300 lens that is about 12 years old without IS. The camera is the Canon 50D. I find that getting older tends to make one shake more, thus I now went for the IS. All these shots were taken at 300mm, 1/400 sec at ISO 400. All the other info is in the EXIF data. The subjects were are various distances. I would like some opinions as to whether these photos are sharp. No PP, just out of the camera in JPEG. I did not use a tripod as I was testing to see if the IS is really helping me out in hand holding. All comments are appreciated. Thanks

Across the Street, over 100 feet Away
Across the Street, over 100 feet Away...

Across the street, over 100 feet Away
Across the street, over 100 feet Away...

Roof Tile, about 30 feet away
Roof Tile, about 30 feet away...

Reply
May 21, 2012 12:03:14   #
ebaribeault Loc: Baltimore
 
Looks sharp to me

Reply
May 21, 2012 12:04:56   #
clixpix Loc: Surprise, Arizona
 
Thanks, glad to hear it.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2012 12:28:39   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
Yes...they certainly do to me.

Reply
May 21, 2012 12:47:07   #
LittleRedFish Loc: Naw'lens (New Orleans)
 
clixpix wrote:
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens to replace my 100-300 lens that is about 12 years old without IS. The camera is the Canon 50D. I find that getting older tends to make one shake more, thus I now went for the IS. All these shots were taken at 300mm, 1/400 sec at ISO 400. All the other info is in the EXIF data. The subjects were are various distances. I would like some opinions as to whether these photos are sharp. No PP, just out of the camera in JPEG. I did not use a tripod as I was testing to see if the IS is really helping me out in hand holding. All comments are appreciated. Thanks
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens... (show quote)


IS will not correct everything. Especially on a 300mm lens. It's big and it's heavy. You should almost always use a monopod or tripod with that lens. Which means that IS is way over rated. It can help with a small bit of shake, but not always enough to make the picture as tack sharp as one might want. Which brings you back to a tripod.

You can try using brust mode on your camera to see if that helps with the sharpness also. You will have to scarfice some light for that, so make the nessecary accomadation on your camera if doing brust mode.

The last picture is sharp, The first two are a little graining, and blurred. The fine details are missing. Go out and try shooting something with a lot of detail, (like a flower) at different distances and see what happens. Pick the same subject. Also may I recommend if you have not already, join the weekly lesson by MWAC. You could learn somethings about your lens there.

good luck! :-D

Reply
May 22, 2012 07:19:04   #
Fran Loc: Northeast, United States
 
Also may I recommend if you have not already, join the weekly lesson by MWAC. You could learn somethings about your lens there.

good luck! :-D[/quote]

What is the name of the weekly lesson? People photography??? Thx

Reply
May 22, 2012 07:44:25   #
home brewer Loc: Fort Wayne, Indiana
 
You could be fighting the "old depth of field" issue a 300 mm lens at f5 focused on smething 15 feet away has a dof of .14 feet (1.7") according to an online calculator. At f8 yhr dof is .22 feet. Notice how unforgiving the 300 mm lense is when used close.

When focused a 100 feet and f8 aperture the DOF is 10.2 feet.
Tom

Reply
 
 
May 22, 2012 09:59:04   #
clixpix Loc: Surprise, Arizona
 
Thanks to all who responded. I appreciate all the help available here on UHH. After more testing and reading the reviews on this lens, I have decided to return it and start over. I still have my non-IS lens that has served me very well for over 10 years so it will keep me going until I decide, once more, to upgrade to an IS lens. I will be searching for, and reading the posts here on UHH as to which lens to explore further.

Regards---Joe

Reply
May 22, 2012 10:18:38   #
Gary521 Loc: Colorado
 
I have and use the lens that you tried. I have it mounted on a 7D. With this camera, I have to microadjust the lens at 300mm to get a sharp picture. I am in the process of replacing the 70-300 with the 100-400L lens.

Reply
May 22, 2012 10:21:25   #
clixpix Loc: Surprise, Arizona
 
Gary:

I spoke with Canon about the microadjust feature on my 50D. They do not recommend using that feature with a telephoto lens. I would be interested in your success in using the feature on your lenses.

Joe

Reply
May 22, 2012 10:22:23   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
clixpix wrote:
Gary:

I spoke with Canon about the microadjust feature on my 50D. They do not recommend using that feature with a telephoto lens. I would be interested in your success in using the feature on your lenses.

Joe


No problem using it on a telephoto.

Reply
 
 
May 22, 2012 10:38:42   #
flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
 
clixpix wrote:
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens to replace my 100-300 lens that is about 12 years old without IS. The camera is the Canon 50D. I find that getting older tends to make one shake more, thus I now went for the IS. All these shots were taken at 300mm, 1/400 sec at ISO 400. All the other info is in the EXIF data. The subjects were are various distances. I would like some opinions as to whether these photos are sharp. No PP, just out of the camera in JPEG. I did not use a tripod as I was testing to see if the IS is really helping me out in hand holding. All comments are appreciated. Thanks
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens... (show quote)


Your lens has a two position image stabilization mode switch on the side as well a one to turn stabilization on and off, it is imperative that you understand when to use this feature.

Not using this in the correct situation can cause some problems with getting good focus.

Reply
May 22, 2012 10:56:51   #
stevenelson Loc: Pauls Valley, Oklahoma
 
You might also try using high speed shooting when hand holding. You will get sharper pictures.

Reply
May 22, 2012 11:05:53   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
clixpix wrote:
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens to replace my 100-300 lens that is about 12 years old without IS. The camera is the Canon 50D. I find that getting older tends to make one shake more, thus I now went for the IS. All these shots were taken at 300mm, 1/400 sec at ISO 400. All the other info is in the EXIF data. The subjects were are various distances. I would like some opinions as to whether these photos are sharp. No PP, just out of the camera in JPEG. I did not use a tripod as I was testing to see if the IS is really helping me out in hand holding. All comments are appreciated. Thanks
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens... (show quote)


You are falling into the "hand holding " trap. Whats wrong with using a tripod?

Reply
May 22, 2012 11:10:45   #
CAM1017 Loc: Chiloquin, Oregon
 
clixpix wrote:
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens to replace my 100-300 lens that is about 12 years old without IS. The camera is the Canon 50D. I find that getting older tends to make one shake more, thus I now went for the IS. All these shots were taken at 300mm, 1/400 sec at ISO 400. All the other info is in the EXIF data. The subjects were are various distances. I would like some opinions as to whether these photos are sharp. No PP, just out of the camera in JPEG. I did not use a tripod as I was testing to see if the IS is really helping me out in hand holding. All comments are appreciated. Thanks
I just got a new Canon 70-300 IS, USM 4.5-5.6 lens... (show quote)


They look pretty good considering they are JPEG. If done in RAW and post processed they would probably knock your socks off with the sharpness. :thumbup:

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.