Panorama
Oct 2, 2016 14:11:47 #
romanticf16
Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
wayne-03 wrote:
When I shot this panorama I leveled my tripod and camera and this is what I got. I was using a 35 mm lens. I wanted to get the top of the trees, but I could not move back as I was against the building next door. Would using a 28 mm lens help? Any suggestions?
You could have set your camera vertically- this would have required more exposures to cover the same area, but would give you the height you needed.
Dec 18, 2016 11:40:31 #
gvarner
Loc: Central Oregon Coast
melismus wrote:
Yes, a wider lens would take in more height. But there is a cheaper way: just rotate the camera 90 degrees to the portrait position, so the long dimension will take in the height. You will have to shoot more frames to fill the desired width, but the price is right.
Dec 27, 2016 18:28:29 #
wayne-03 wrote:
When I shot this panorama I leveled my tripod and camera and this is what I got. I was using a 35 mm lens. I wanted to get the top of the trees, but I could not move back as I was against the building next door. Would using a 28 mm lens help? Any suggestions?
PS CC 2017 offers a range of corrective ideas on its "image" menu... they all help, with practice, but do not get to 100%. See attached sample. 17mm-40mm Canon lens used at 17mm for 5 images and merged in PS CC 2017.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.