I just can't shoot without the IS set on high now that I am a tad older and sometime shake a whole lot. LMAO
DK wrote:
eye art wrote:
To those of you who recently have taken your time to respond and input feedback, it is touching and so very very appreciated.
Although as mentioned I do have a focusing 'issue', at times the result is either totally intentional or the out of focus result is actually conveying my intent better than having hit it dead on with the focus. Someone commented earlier that not every photograph needs to be razor sharp in order for it to be considered a good or even beautiful shot. I very much subscribe to that line of thought and it will often show in my work.
Responding to DK's question, I try when possible and available to purchase Vibration Control lenses, I did not know this was a feature with cameras....?
THANKS AGAIN GUYS & HUGS TO ALL
EyeArt
To those of you who recently have taken your time ... (
show quote)
I was just thinking that if you have trouble holding the camera steady, an IS lens or camera would help you with that. I love IS and autofocus as I get older.
quote=eye art To those of you who recently have t... (
show quote)
I too took a second look at the little bird and did a couple logicalPS7 tricks - Filter>sharpen> un sharp mask (default setting) then image>adjustments>brightness/contrast>+18% contrast - then cropped - darn nice photo I think - one more time just a couple tweeks in PP can "snap" a photo
MIKE GALLAGHER wrote:
Well the last one just suffered from lightening and darkening but here's what happened to the second one with darkening and cropping.
Mike
Blured Bird
Also when using a tripod - if you don't have a remote shutter release use the camera's self timer - mine has a 2 second setting so it is click the shutter and stand back to let the camera quickly do it's thing
DK wrote:
eye art wrote:
To those of you who recently have taken your time to respond and input feedback, it is touching and so very very appreciated.
Although as mentioned I do have a focusing 'issue', at times the result is either totally intentional or the out of focus result is actually conveying my intent better than having hit it dead on with the focus. Someone commented earlier that not every photograph needs to be razor sharp in order for it to be considered a good or even beautiful shot. I very much subscribe to that line of thought and it will often show in my work.
Responding to DK's question, I try when possible and available to purchase Vibration Control lenses, I did not know this was a feature with cameras....?
THANKS AGAIN GUYS & HUGS TO ALL
EyeArt
To those of you who recently have taken your time ... (
show quote)
I was just thinking that if you have trouble holding the camera steady, an IS lens or camera would help you with that. I love IS and autofocus as I get older.
quote=eye art To those of you who recently have t... (
show quote)
Forgive my ignorance what is a IS lens?
DK
Loc: SD
eye art wrote:
Forgive my ignorance what is a IS lens?
Image Stabilized. It helps if you have some camera shake to keep the photo sharp and hand hold the camera for more shots.
Great shots. I love second one - do you know what kind it is? Also love the first one of the ocean.
Nice job, Harvey, on some PP on the blurred bird. Hope Eyeart likes it--I do.
Harvey wrote:
I too took a second look at the little bird and did a couple logicalPS7 tricks - Filter>sharpen> un sharp mask (default setting) then image>adjustments>brightness/contrast>+18% contrast - then cropped - darn nice photo I think - one more time just a couple tweeks in PP can "snap" a photo
MIKE GALLAGHER wrote:
Well the last one just suffered from lightening and darkening but here's what happened to the second one with darkening and cropping.
Mike
Try screwing an eye-ring (hardware) into the bottom of your camera where it would attach to a tripod. To the circle part of the eye-ring, attach a tether or cord about 4.5-5 feet long. When shooting your pic, stand on the cord, pulling it taut. Then take the pic. It should help stabilize your camera and will be much easier for you to carry around. At most, will cost you a couple bucks. Well worth a try.
FWIW, I think the composition on the first pic is fantastic! The 2nd pic would be very good if the eye was focused. Third pic is good, IMO.
Lou Ellen
eye art wrote:
I would like to THANK everyone for their great advice and their perspective on my photos.
The focusing problem is primarily due to a neurological disorder docs believe I have, sufficient to say it is difficult for me to hold my camera in a steady manner.
Hugs,
EyeArt
Good job Harvey, the little bird just needed a bit of tweeking
Harvey wrote:
I too took a second look at the little bird and did a couple logicalPS7 tricks - Filter>sharpen> un sharp mask (default setting) then image>adjustments>brightness/contrast>+18% contrast - then cropped - darn nice photo I think - one more time just a couple tweeks in PP can "snap" a photo
MIKE GALLAGHER wrote:
Well the last one just suffered from lightening and darkening but here's what happened to the second one with darkening and cropping.
Mike
:roll:
A lot of digital cameras have Image Stablisation (spl) modes built into them - my Lumix FZ18 has 3 setting - on/off- 1 (low) & 2 (high) as being in my mid 70's and not too steady I keep my camera set on the highest setting. Some lens for DSLR have it built into them. With the IS set high one can get lots of photos without a tripod - logic and practice will teach you there are times a tripod is mandatory.
eye art wrote:
Forgive my ignorance what is a IS lens?
eye art wrote:
Got a case of 'self doubt' again...being that I'm self taught, so how do these images look to you folks ?
Thanks for taking the time to look and respond.
EyeArt
I don't understand where the self doubt is coming from. The shots are very good, a bit of extra work on the focusing situation on 1 & 2, they all are good. Looks like you have a good grasp on what you are doing, setting up your shots etc.
You are coming along very good, just keep shooting.
bigcoz wrote:
I don't agree with the out of focus comment regarding the first photo. It is true that the grasses are out of focus but I think it enhances the photo and gives the impression that they are blowing in the wind, which they probably are.
Hi bigcoz and that is exactly why I liked that photo. Technically none of the photos were tack sharp, but in my mind that is what made the first photo stand out. The impression of the grasses moving in the wind, kept the photo from being stagnant and still. Combine that with the colors of the grass, sea, sky and waves breaking on the beach made for a mood setting photo. One can almost feel the breeze, the mist and the smell of the ocean.
eye art wrote:
Thanks Travin.
Hi eye art... You're more than welcome, thanks for sharing your pictures.
i like them all but I am also still learning so the info from others has been very helpful
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.