(3)Testing Impressions 2
Sep 23, 2016 05:59:46 #
Still working on trying to dial in Impressions 2
Comments welcomed
Comments welcomed
Sep 23, 2016 06:30:49 #
Sep 23, 2016 06:36:09 #
Sep 23, 2016 06:56:53 #
Sep 23, 2016 07:02:16 #
Now snap shot, I really like your beautiful flower photos that are sort of in a dream state... BUT.....
But taken with a ... well as some would call it a "Point & Shoot," a Canon S95. To admit to liking your photos is similar to saying that a connoisseur of fine wine likes La Moneda Reserva Malbec, a dry red wine at Walmart for $6 (“Best in Show” award at the Decanter Magazine World Wine Awards. ).... yes, highly rated, but not $60 a 0.75L bottle. So I am embarrassed .... i like your photos... all 10 MPix of them.
OR
Am I right in speaking of my Sony HX50 as tho it is a good ... not P&S... rather friend there 24/7 ready to Super-Zoom... right from my pocket.
Am I right in speaking of spending money for software rather than bulky tho new antiquated DSLRs cameras costing thousands for body and glass.
Help me Snap-Shot why do people assuredly mistakenly love these photos???? Why oh Why??? They can not be good they were taken with a 2009 low cost camera...
What?? do I hear you saying it is the photographer and the post processing not the camera... really?
But taken with a ... well as some would call it a "Point & Shoot," a Canon S95. To admit to liking your photos is similar to saying that a connoisseur of fine wine likes La Moneda Reserva Malbec, a dry red wine at Walmart for $6 (“Best in Show” award at the Decanter Magazine World Wine Awards. ).... yes, highly rated, but not $60 a 0.75L bottle. So I am embarrassed .... i like your photos... all 10 MPix of them.
OR
Am I right in speaking of my Sony HX50 as tho it is a good ... not P&S... rather friend there 24/7 ready to Super-Zoom... right from my pocket.
Am I right in speaking of spending money for software rather than bulky tho new antiquated DSLRs cameras costing thousands for body and glass.
Help me Snap-Shot why do people assuredly mistakenly love these photos???? Why oh Why??? They can not be good they were taken with a 2009 low cost camera...
What?? do I hear you saying it is the photographer and the post processing not the camera... really?
Sep 23, 2016 07:06:36 #
rlaugh wrote:
Such beautiful work my friend...really like these!!
Bob, thank you so much! Your kind reviews keep me inspired!
Sep 23, 2016 07:07:48 #
angler wrote:
Beautiful Snap Shot.
I'm glad you like these Jim! Thanks for the steady support!
Sep 23, 2016 07:09:05 #
djtravels wrote:
You've reached a new level of excellence. Great work. djt
DJT, thank you! I really appreciate that!
Sep 23, 2016 07:10:40 #
dpullum wrote:
Now snap shot, I really like your beautiful flower... (show quote)
That's close my friend! It ain't the camera, its all in the software! Snap Shot
Sep 23, 2016 07:51:07 #
Sep 23, 2016 08:21:49 #
Bill, of these, I really like number 3 followed by 2. I think I prefer enough detail/pattern to keep me exploring the frame.
Sep 23, 2016 08:26:42 #
Sep 23, 2016 08:57:53 #
Sep 23, 2016 09:00:05 #
Cwilson341 wrote:
Bill, of these, I really like number 3 followed by 2. I think I prefer enough detail/pattern to keep me exploring the frame.
Carol, thank you again for commenting! I really appreciate your critique!
Sep 23, 2016 09:01:33 #
Treepusher wrote:
Nice job on these. Dreamy enough to be really appealing!
Thank you Randy! It's always good to hear from you!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.