CathyAnn wrote:
Linda, how do you typically set up your camera for such a shot under sunset/sunrise conditions? Do you spot meter and focus on the moon or do something else? Is bracketing and combining the resulting pictures the way to go? I notice that in your pictures, the moon and everything else is in perfect focus.
CathyAnn wrote:
... And when focusing on the moon so its features are visible to the camera, the parts of the tree were blurred. Is it just a trade off depending on what we're trying to capture for that particular shot?
Linda, on your last two pictures the moon and scenery are in focus.
There is no need to bracket if you shoot when there is a lot of sunlight, such as my first and last shots. Most everything was equally - or close to equal - bright. The darker the conditions, the less ability the camera has to capture both moon details and landscape details.
At that point you'd have to do a composite of two photos: exposed for moon and exposed for landscape. With my photo #2, I believe I used exposure compensation to lower the exposure (I was probably on shutter priority, hand-holding); otherwise, the image would have been lighter than I wanted.
My camera is set up to do center-weighted metering, I believe. I always try to be aware of whether I might want to use exposure compensation, or change one of the settings.
This past year I've been mostly setting my aperture and shutter speed, and letting the camera set ISO.
On photo #3 I believe I focused on the trees. The distance from
me to the trees allowed for the moon to at least "appear" to be well detailed. Yes, it would be a trade-off if your tree is quite close.
Below is link to a depth of field calculator. I could only find the P510 as reference. Plug in the camera make, f/stop and focal length. Try distance to subject (your tree) as 100 feet. Look at the depth of field (right side info). Now change the calculator to show that you were standing just 10 feet away. Wowsa!
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.htmlOn #1 I should have used smaller aperture (it was f/9 on a dslr). If all looks sharp, that is likely due to shooting in raw, and using Nik and PS Elements for pp