Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
For Your Consideration
Japanese Fan Columbine
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 9, 2016 07:19:11   #
dsturr
 
Aquilegia flabellata 'Alba'.


(Download)

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 09:53:39   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
dsturr wrote:
Aquilegia flabellata 'Alba'.


This is a beautiful, well composed flower image of a species I'm unfamiliar with. I like the natural-looking light, the delicate colors, the detail and the blurred background. I always seem to ask for more light, but I am convinced that is just me. I have no trouble seeing the details here, but something in me just always seems to crave light. Thanks for sharing this very appealing close-up.

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 09:59:30   #
dsturr
 
minniev wrote:
This is a beautiful, well composed flower image of a species I'm unfamiliar with. I like the natural-looking light, the delicate colors, the detail and the blurred background. I always seem to ask for more light, but I am convinced that is just me. I have no trouble seeing the details here, but something in me just always seems to crave light. Thanks for sharing this very appealing close-up.


Thanks.
The light was coming through my eastward facing kitchen window.
And a thumbs up to every photo in your Working Folk of Nola post.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2016 11:14:50   #
Chuck_893 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
 
minniev wrote:
This is a beautiful, well composed flower image of a species I'm unfamiliar with. I like the natural-looking light, the delicate colors, the detail and the blurred background. I always seem to ask for more light, but I am convinced that is just me. I have no trouble seeing the details here, but something in me just always seems to crave light. Thanks for sharing this very appealing close-up.

I love the picture! It is exactly as Min says, but I have the same thought: it seems "printed down" to me, i.e. a tad dark. I always say "there is no light like back light," and if I had made it (I also always say that) I'd have raised the value of the brightest petal on the right until juuuuusssst shy of clipping. That does not denigrate the picture, which is fabulous no matter how you present it, just that I wouldn't mind seeing it lighter.

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 11:39:00   #
Frank2013 Loc: San Antonio, TX. & Milwaukee, WI.
 
I think it's a splendid shot as is, although will admit to turning my screen brightness all the way up. Well done. Only thing I find distracting is the lower left portion of the right vertical white blossom, not sure what the white/green spot is.

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 11:46:18   #
randomeyes Loc: wilds of b.c. canada
 
extremely sharp, (everywhere) colorful, very well done. I'm guessing here, but somewhere around 50+ layers?

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 11:53:56   #
dsturr
 
randomeyes wrote:
extremely sharp, (everywhere) colorful, very well done. I'm guessing here, but somewhere around 50+ layers?


Thanks.
Around that by the time I'd finished with it.

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Sep 9, 2016 12:00:10   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Stunning details in that big bottom leaf. Love the composition. Beautifully done.

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 12:11:20   #
dsturr
 
Frank2013 wrote:
I think it's a splendid shot as is, although will admit to turning my screen brightness all the way up. Well done. Only thing I find distracting is the lower left portion of the right vertical white blossom, not sure what the white/green spot is.


Thanks Frank.
It looks like an artifact where a tiny hair from the flower meets up with a bright portion of the leaf and ended up somewhat messy in the down sampling. I should have cloned it out.

As for the brightness I'm never sure what it's going to look like on someone else's monitor so if it's going to be off I prefer it to be on the dark side. So either the monitor brightness or an adjustment layer if one wants to. Or modify anything I put on here in anyway that one wants.

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 12:45:32   #
dsturr
 
Chuck_893 wrote:
I love the picture! It is exactly as Min says, but I have the same thought: it seems "printed down" to me, i.e. a tad dark. I always say "there is no light like back light," and if I had made it (I also always say that) I'd have raised the value of the brightest petal on the right until juuuuusssst shy of clipping. That does not denigrate the picture, which is fabulous no matter how you present it, just that I wouldn't mind seeing it lighter.
I love the picture! It is exactly as Min says, but... (show quote)


Thanks.
As I noted to Frank I'd rather hear that it's too dark than that it's washed out, not enough contrast etc. And I'll gladly accept the word "fabulous." And I should have been more explicit: If anyone want's to post alterations (exposure, different backgrounds, B&W version etc.) then go for it.

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 13:03:44   #
dsturr
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Stunning details in that big bottom leaf. Love the composition. Beautifully done.


Thank you very much.

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Sep 9, 2016 18:38:02   #
Billyspad Loc: The Philippines
 
This is your rather splendid image with a touch of Ambient Light added in Tiffen DFX which I feel does a much better job of adding natural looking light than any other software package. One may wish to take down the brightness of the petal on the right but I felt overall it benefited from being just a little brighter


(Download)

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 19:37:42   #
dsturr
 
Billyspad wrote:
This is your rather splendid image with a touch of Ambient Light added in Tiffen DFX which I feel does a much better job of adding natural looking light than any other software package. One may wish to take down the brightness of the petal on the right but I felt overall it benefited from being just a little brighter


Thanks Billy.
As I said whatever makes it look better on one's monitor and not having to go to the trouble of actually adjusting the monitor. This makes it look over exposed on all three of the monitor's in our household but no doubt some are saying that it's an improvement.

I never did comment on your Iris picture; great composite. Obviously they felt the same at Light Stalking where it was featured as "Photo of the week".

Reply
Sep 9, 2016 21:01:17   #
Billyspad Loc: The Philippines
 
dsturr wrote:
Thanks Billy.
As I said whatever makes it look better on one's monitor and not having to go to the trouble of actually adjusting the monitor. This makes it look over exposed on all three of the monitor's in our household but no doubt some are saying that it's an improvement.

I never did comment on your Iris picture; great composite. Obviously they felt the same at Light Stalking where it was featured as "Photo of the week".


Good morning from a rather hot South Seas and thank you for the compliment. Sometimes even an old snapper gets a winner. It was not a composite but one image used with a photoshop action to start, with further lines painted in and parts of the original image blended through with layer masks. What I call a Billydoodle but sometimes luck strikes and I get an appealing one.

Reply
Sep 10, 2016 08:43:15   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
Pretty.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
For Your Consideration
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.