Help with lens selection
Aug 22, 2016 14:50:32 #
I am very interested in either the Canon 70-200 mm 2.8 II IS USM and the Sigma 70-200 mm 2.8 EX APO DG IS HSM. I am an enthusiast (not a pro by any means). I know that the Canon model is the industry standard, used by many pf the pros. I have also heard very good things about the Sigma version. I own two Sigma lenses and have been satisfied with their build quality and the photos that I have taken with them. Since there is approximately $900.00 to $1000.00 difference in price, I am wondering if I would get that much more in performance with the Canon over the Sigma. Would like to hear from owners of each lens and/or anyone who can give me some insight that will help with my decision.
Aug 22, 2016 15:13:55 #
PaulB wrote:
I am very interested in either the Canon 70-200 mm... (show quote)
I also have a few sigma lenses, that I bought, new, when they were still interested in making them with the K-mount, for pentax. I don't regret having bought them, they serve me well.. BUT!! if the canon is an "L" series, the differences will be notable. Whether you're novice or not, I would recommend saving for and getting the "L"-series Canon. The glass is always the issue... RJM
Aug 22, 2016 15:56:04 #
Can't tell you anything about the Sigma. I have the EF 70-200 f/2.8 L II IS and find it to be an excellent lens in every respect. Here is a review you may find helpful:
http://www.canonrumors.com/reviews/canonef70200f28lisi/
Unless you really have a definite use for the 2.8 of the 70-200 I suggest you take a look at the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L II IS. I have that lens also and find that I use it far more then the 70-200, unless I am shooting indoor sports. The 100-400's IQ, build quality, IS, price, and overall size are on a par with the 70-200, plus it has far more reach. If I could only have one, it would be the 100-400.
http://www.canonrumors.com/reviews/canonef70200f28lisi/
Unless you really have a definite use for the 2.8 of the 70-200 I suggest you take a look at the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L II IS. I have that lens also and find that I use it far more then the 70-200, unless I am shooting indoor sports. The 100-400's IQ, build quality, IS, price, and overall size are on a par with the 70-200, plus it has far more reach. If I could only have one, it would be the 100-400.
Aug 22, 2016 15:57:43 #
Aug 22, 2016 15:58:54 #
Aug 22, 2016 16:12:55 #
digit-up wrote:
I also have a few sigma lenses, that I bought, new, when they were still interested in making them with the K-mount, for pentax. I don't regret having bought them, they serve me well.. BUT!! if the canon is an "L" series, the differences will be notable. Whether you're novice or not, I would recommend saving for and getting the "L"-series Canon. The glass is always the issue... RJM
👍👍 if I had to choose one of my lenses to keep, it would be the Canon EF 70-200 f2.8L. At a recent seminar hosted by our local newspaper (who employs 11 photographers), every single presenter had this lens as one of their 3 or 4 go-to lenses. 'Nuff said.
Aug 22, 2016 22:04:46 #
PaulB wrote:
I am very interested in either the Canon 70-200 mm... (show quote)
The sigma is the oldest design of any of the current 70-200mm lenses and will be upgraded very soon to be a USB Dock compatible Sport series lens. The current Sigma holds its own quite well and is a great buy for the price.
Aug 22, 2016 22:43:14 #
A couple of links to tests. Other things to consider besides sharpness are autofocus speed, IS effectiveness, weather sealing, build quality and resale value in addition to the original price:
http://petapixel.com/2015/03/28/just-the-lenses-the-great-200mm-shoot-out/
http://www.dxomark.com/lenses/brand-canon-sigma/mounted_on-Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_III-795/mount_type-Canon_EF/focal-from-70-to-200/aperture_max-from-2.8-to-16/lens_use_case-lens_medium-lens_telephoto/lens_zoom-zoom/sensor_brand-Canon#hideAdvancedOptions=false&viewMode=list&yDataType=global
http://petapixel.com/2015/03/28/just-the-lenses-the-great-200mm-shoot-out/
http://www.dxomark.com/lenses/brand-canon-sigma/mounted_on-Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_III-795/mount_type-Canon_EF/focal-from-70-to-200/aperture_max-from-2.8-to-16/lens_use_case-lens_medium-lens_telephoto/lens_zoom-zoom/sensor_brand-Canon#hideAdvancedOptions=false&viewMode=list&yDataType=global
Aug 23, 2016 07:06:10 #
LFingar wrote:
Can't tell you anything about the Sigma. I have th... (show quote)
This is what several reviewers are now saying - that the new version of the 100-400 is so good - and about the same weight as the 70-200 2.8 - that it makes more sense to buy that. I am watching this discussion and the reviews because I was thinking of getting the 70-200 but may now decide to trade in my version 1 100-400 for a new one!
Aug 23, 2016 07:52:26 #
I'm not a Canon user, but will offer standard advice good for whatever camera someone owns. Purchase the best you can. You can't go wrong with Canon. Just because you're not a pro doesn't mean you need to short change your possibility of producing professional results.
--Bob
--Bob
PaulB wrote:
I am very interested in either the Canon 70-200 mm... (show quote)
Aug 23, 2016 09:03:15 #
Aug 23, 2016 09:04:27 #
get the Canon; don't forget it will bring much more on resale when you are done with it. Plus it is a better lens. It is one of my main lenses
Aug 23, 2016 11:27:49 #
Pilotpaul
I owned the 70-200 Sigma but purchased the Canon 70-200 ii & it is an absolute great lens. Faster auto focus & tack sharp. Weighs more but we'll balanced with my bodies w/grips. If Sigma did sell a Sport version with metal housing & USB dock, then I would have considered it, but not available. My suggestion is to purchase the best lenses you can afford since most photographers keep lenses long than bodies. Good luck, Mike
I owned the 70-200 Sigma but purchased the Canon 70-200 ii & it is an absolute great lens. Faster auto focus & tack sharp. Weighs more but we'll balanced with my bodies w/grips. If Sigma did sell a Sport version with metal housing & USB dock, then I would have considered it, but not available. My suggestion is to purchase the best lenses you can afford since most photographers keep lenses long than bodies. Good luck, Mike
Aug 23, 2016 11:34:51 #
PaulB wrote:
I am very interested in either the Canon 70-200 mm... (show quote)
The IS is a lot better and the auto focus of the Canon put the Sigma to shame, also the IQ is much better! Well that can all be read in reviews!
Aug 23, 2016 12:24:50 #
PaulB wrote:
I am very interested in either the Canon 70-200 mm... (show quote)
IMO, If you do not mind a tiny tik less resolution or AF speed/accuracy for the $1000 difference, the Sigma will serve you well.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.