Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Attempting to join the party..
Jun 25, 2018 07:36:02 #
Very nice indeed but have the others noticed this original post is TWO YEARS old. Time to party again?
Jun 25, 2018 08:14:00 #
Stardust wrote:
Very nice indeed but have the others noticed this original post is TWO YEARS old. Time to party again?
I think a few latecomers to the Section have been sifting through older posts and then commenting, thus resurrecting these older threads. This is not the only case.
Most disconcerting would be forgetting that you had commented before and then coming up with a contrary opinion; coming up with the same comment would be most gratifying. Of course, the best is to recognize the photo and remember that you have already commented.
Jun 25, 2018 16:01:21 #
JohnFrim wrote:
Agree, when I first joined I had looked at posts for months before so went back and complimentary commented on a few older. But then also made rookie mistake of giving my advice or opinion on something, then later realized topic was 2-3 yrs old and surely had been well solved by then. As for me if I give three comments on the same post and 2 of 3 match, that is a win in my book! I think a few latecomers to the Section have been sifting through older posts and then commenting, thus resurrecting these older threads. This is not the only case.
Most disconcerting would be forgetting that you had commented before and then coming up with a contrary opinion; coming up with the same comment would be most gratifying. Of course, the best is to recognize the photo and remember that you have already commented.
Most disconcerting would be forgetting that you had commented before and then coming up with a contrary opinion; coming up with the same comment would be most gratifying. Of course, the best is to recognize the photo and remember that you have already commented.
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Jun 25, 2018 18:48:18 #
steve_stoneblossom
Loc: Rhode Island, USA
Stardust wrote:
Very nice indeed but have the others noticed this original post is TWO YEARS old. Time to party again?
Very odd... impossible to verify at this point, but I feel fairly certain that when I first saw this (days ago) it was labeled "new topic" as opposed to "new posts".
Jun 26, 2018 17:46:24 #
Jun 30, 2018 22:34:32 #
rdgreenwood wrote:
After so, so many mediocre images, we finally get a wonderful study. Others should take note. This is an outstanding photograph, not just a shot of a woman with no clothes on.
THIS^ +100
Best shot I've seen on here. . . very pretty girl, interesting pose, great facial expression, complementary lighting, sexy but not vulgar
Jul 24, 2018 19:16:31 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.