Trump Campaign Hits A New Level Of Crazy With Claim Of Reporters Beating Trump Supporters
Aug 15, 2016 14:27:46 #
Aug 15, 2016 14:30:54 #
He's not that crazy. He figured out a long time ago that his stupid gullible supporters will believe any shit that comes out of his mouth. There are about a dozen members here on UHH that prove this on a daily basis.
Aug 15, 2016 14:34:31 #
Aug 15, 2016 15:08:17 #
dirtpusher wrote:
We see that daily. Lol
More politicuspus. But hey, take shit out of context. You're good at it.
Aug 15, 2016 15:09:45 #
Aug 16, 2016 23:21:58 #
dirtpusher wrote:
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/15/trump-campaign-hits-level-crazy-claim-reporters-beating-trump-supporters.html
Pierson didn't claim a literal beating by reporters. She said, “…they are tired of seeing left wing reporters literally beat Trump supporters into submission…”
As used, the word is an intensifier for beat, a figurative expression, not an actual action.
Passing on deliberately deceptive claims does no one any credit.
Aug 16, 2016 23:28:16 #
Phreedom wrote:
Pierson didn't claim a literal beating by reporters. She said, “…they are tired of seeing left wing reporters literally beat Trump supporters into submission…”
As used, the word is an intensifier for beat, a figurative expression, not an actual action.
Passing on deliberately deceptive claims does no one any credit.
As used, the word is an intensifier for beat, a figurative expression, not an actual action.
Passing on deliberately deceptive claims does no one any credit.
Battleground Map: Hillary Clinton Solidifies Lead Against Donald Trump
well if thats your take on what that means. well good luck with rest of your life.
Aug 16, 2016 23:38:16 #
Phreedom wrote:
Pierson didn't claim a literal beating by reporters. She said, “…they are tired of seeing left wing reporters literally beat Trump supporters into submission…”
As used, the word is an intensifier for beat, a figurative expression, not an actual action.
Passing on deliberately deceptive claims does no one any credit.
As used, the word is an intensifier for beat, a figurative expression, not an actual action.
Passing on deliberately deceptive claims does no one any credit.
I don't want to sound like an apologist for this poor woman but maybe she meant figuratively instead of literally. You would think someone with her responsibilities would know the difference. At her level of trumpsplaining, communication is all about NOT being misunderstood.
Aug 18, 2016 00:38:23 #
dirtpusher wrote:
Battleground Map: Hillary Clinton Solidifies Lead Against Donald Trump
How does this new headline relate to A New Level Of Crazy With Claim Of Reporters Beating Trump Supporters which was the original topic?
Quote:
well if thats your take on what that means. well good luck with rest of your life.
Yes, that’s my take of what Ms. Pierson said and meant.
Thank you for your good wishes and the best of literal luck to you in your future endeavours.
Aug 18, 2016 00:42:09 #
Texcaster wrote:
I don't want to sound like an apologist for this poor woman but maybe she meant figuratively instead of literally. You would think someone with her responsibilities would know the difference. At her level of trumpsplaining, communication is all about NOT being misunderstood.
You needn’t apologise over “this poor woman”; her communication was quite clear.
I believe she knew the difference between literal and literally and I bet even Jason Easley knew it too.
Just to be clear, literally is an intensifier used before a figurative expression.
“His comments were so crushing, they literally smashed her to the floor.”
Do you think it means she was actually smashed to the floor?
Of course, this is all my opinion… unless, I misunderstood you.
Aug 18, 2016 05:13:58 #
Phreedom wrote:
You needn’t apologise over “this poor woman”; her ... (show quote)
That poor woman is in the business of trumpsplaining, that means not being misunderstood. She used the wrong word and the press had a picnic with it. Literally is literally misused all the time.
"There are zero documented incidents of reporters literally beating Trump supporters. Literally beating means that reporters are physically assaulting Trump supporters, which is not happening. What is happening is that Trump is provoking attacks on the media at every single one of his rallies." Politicus
Aug 18, 2016 08:23:29 #
Phreedom wrote:
Yes, that’s my take of what Ms. Pierson said and meant.
Thank you for your good wishes and the best of literal luck to you in your future endeavours.
Thank you for your good wishes and the best of literal luck to you in your future endeavours.
Lol there is different ways how beat people up. Was it referring to physically beating people up.
Aug 18, 2016 08:56:26 #
Keenan wrote:
He's not that crazy. He figured out a long time ago that his stupid gullible supporters will believe any shit that comes out of his mouth. There are about a dozen members here on UHH that prove this on a daily basis.
KKKeenan is the leader of all the bullshit that passes through the lips of the libtards who have lost their way in the moral outreach of our country.
Ranting on to hear himself without proof or defining his true feelings why he is just as much a pathological liar as Hillary. Spend you own time
searching for the 'faggot gene' instead of attacking people who believe in much higher morals and principles than you are showing.
Aug 18, 2016 11:27:23 #
dirtpusher wrote:
Lol there is different ways how beat people up. Was it referring to physically beating people up.
LOL
I accept for the moment that your intent here isn’t to shine me on.
Yes, a potential meaning for “beat” is the physical striking of someone or something and there are indeed many different ways to beat people up… or down.
However, the meaning of a word is understood by application of the linguistic context of the discourse and circumstances of the situation it references. This understanding is universal to all communication and is normally reached through a judicious interpretation as influenced by the cultural mores of the society it is expressed with-in.
I point at you and raise my thumb. That could be a sign of agreement, acceptance or even a positive comment about you.
Another viewer, predisposed to find fault in me and, even knowing the surrounding circumstances and context, might willfully choose to report that I signaled you to “sit on this and rotate”.
Aug 18, 2016 11:33:37 #
Phreedom wrote:
LOL br I accept for the moment that your intent h... (show quote)
In your one frame mind
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.