Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
How can I improve panning?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 7, 2016 10:34:16   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Morning Star wrote:
The last several weeks I have been practicing "panning" and this afternoon when I went with my son to the airport where he has his plane, I had another great opportunity!
My problem is, that I know to keep moving as I press the shutter release button, but my fingers and head don't always remember that, and some of the panned photos I took in these past weeks are good for the garbage bin only.
This picture is what I came up with this afternoon. The plane is reasonably sharp, and the trees are blurred. But I still don't see "movement" in this photo.
Anyone have any suggestions how I can get this feeling of movement, and generally improve taking this kind of photo?
I'd much appreciate it.
The last several weeks I have been practicing &quo... (show quote)


Practice Practice Practice!

If you are going to an air show, 1/160th is probably fine for most propeller driven planes. I'd just experiment. Something between 1/100 - 1/200 should be good. You just want to see a little movement or blur on the prop. But when shooting jets, speed up your shutter to anything higher to stop the action.

Keep the background behind the planes in your thoughts. I like to see them in clouds. I like to see them with mountains behind them. I don't like to see them with modern buildings, telephone poles, towers, people etc. in the BG. Get some closeups while they are on the ground. Convert some to black and white. Have fun.

Some of my prop planes were shot with too fast a shutter and there's no prop blur. It's not really that big of a deal in my opinion. If you don't have good panning technique, it's better to use a fast shutter so that the plane isn't blurry from the motion. If you have mastered the panning technique, then by all means, shoot at 1/200th or a little slower.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Aug 7, 2016 11:38:33   #
foathog Loc: Greensboro, NC
 
RWR wrote:
For this shot, you need a slower shutter speed.


AND you need to zoom in more. subject is too small in the frame. on number one.

Reply
Aug 7, 2016 14:36:38   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
Wanda Krack beat me to the comment I was going to make!

Reply
 
 
Aug 15, 2016 08:52:21   #
Radioactive Loc: Bellingham
 
I shot this at 1/80th of a second.
Bill



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.