MtnMan wrote:
50' is far for small birds.
Best lens is Nikon 200-500.
"Best". Your opinion, rather than universal truth. Geesus.
tramsey wrote:
I have a Nikon d7100 and one lens, a 18-300. I use it for my everything lens and have no problems with it. Some things that I do might help: always use a tripod when shooting a feeder from a distance, prefocus on the spot that they most frequently use, set your focus to 'spot focus' set the camera on burst, and use a remote release. I do these things and I am rewarded with good photos. I forgot one other thing: patience, you need a ton of it.
Your d3300 is up to the task that you have for it. Good luck
I have a Nikon d7100 and one lens, a 18-300. I us... (
show quote)
But not at that distance with that lens combo.
rbrady1964 wrote:
I am a newbie to dslr photography. I just bought a Nikon 3300 and it came with 2 lens . A Nikkor 18-55mm and a 55-200mm.It also came with a 2.5x telephoto and a 0.45x wide angle.I am learning as I go,but I love to take pictures of birds and I have a bird feeder about 50' from my porch and I can't seem to get a close-up like I want. Please help and let me know what I'm doing wrong ! Thanks ! π
Tamron 150-600, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary or Sport, Nikon 200-500. Or move your feeder within 15 feet of your shooting perch.
MtnMan wrote:
You can order the black one now on Nikon web site and it says the red and grey are on backorder. That doesn't seem discontined to me.
Nikon usually doesn't stop a model till it's replacement is out for a few months. Haven't heard of a D3500 yet.
Many consider the D3300 Nikon's best value.
And they would be right. Capable of producing stunning image quality when paired with the right lenses and in the right hands.
Jim Bob wrote:
Exactemundo.
You mean "exactamundo". And that's not an opinion.
rogerl
Loc: UK (Harrogate, North Yorkshire)
A lot depends on how much you want to spend! Look at the Sigma & Tamron 150-600 lenses both of which have had good reports on here. I do a lot of wildlife photography (inc. safaris) & use the older Simga 150-500 which works very well for me. As it's been superseded you should be able to pick one up (relatively!) cheaply.
jcboy3 wrote:
You mean "exactamundo". And that's not an opinion.
Nope. That's what you mean. I posted what I meant. Take your paternalism elsewhere.
rbrady1964 wrote:
I am a newbie to dslr photography. I just bought a Nikon 3300 and it came with 2 lens . A Nikkor 18-55mm and a 55-200mm.It also came with a 2.5x telephoto and a 0.45x wide angle.I am learning as I go,but I love to take pictures of birds and I have a bird feeder about 50' from my porch and I can't seem to get a close-up like I want. Please help and let me know what I'm doing wrong ! Thanks ! π
Sounds like you can't move the feeder, which would be the best option. The Nikon 200-500 is very good, but pricey. The Tamron 150-600 is pretty good, as is the Sigma equivalent. Both (except for Sigma's "Sport" model) are about $1,000.
rbrady1964 wrote:
I am a newbie to dslr photography. I just bought a Nikon 3300 and it came with 2 lens . A Nikkor 18-55mm and a 55-200mm.It also came with a 2.5x telephoto and a 0.45x wide angle.I am learning as I go,but I love to take pictures of birds and I have a bird feeder about 50' from my porch and I can't seem to get a close-up like I want. Please help and let me know what I'm doing wrong ! Thanks ! ΓΒ°ΓΒΓΒΓΒ
The Nikon 18-300 is a good all round lens. The Tamron 16-300 is also an excellent lens and is a bit cheaper than the Nikon. Also, purchasing a used lens (Amazon and Adorama are my go to dealers) can be q great option.
I have the Tamron which I use on my Nikon 7100 and have gotten some great shots of wildlife with it.
CLF
Loc: Raleigh, NC
rbrady1964 wrote:
I am a newbie to dslr photography. I just bought a Nikon 3300 and it came with 2 lens . A Nikkor 18-55mm and a 55-200mm.It also came with a 2.5x telephoto and a 0.45x wide angle.I am learning as I go,but I love to take pictures of birds and I have a bird feeder about 50' from my porch and I can't seem to get a close-up like I want. Please help and let me know what I'm doing wrong ! Thanks ! π
Rbrady1964, If I am correct the 2.5x mounts to the front of the lens. This is not a solution to your requirements. You have had some very good suggestions. I have went through the same process you are going through in the last 18months.
1. Move the feeder closer if you can.
2. Use a blind. I actually have two blinds set up for different angles of my feeders (a total of 10-12 depending on Hummingbird feeders).
3. Get a longer lens. Buy a used lens, you will be surprised of the IQ on the used lens that was treated correctly by the owner. Most of my lenses are used. Only bought new when I could not get a comparable one used. KEH, B&H, and Cameta are all trusted suppliers of used equipment. My first used long zoom was a Sigma 50-500mm I bought from a local photographer who needed a lens with Image Stability, this Sigma did not have it. IS is also called different things from different manufacturers. I paid $350 for it and a year later I traded up to a Tamron 150-600 with all the bells and whistles. I got $450 on a trade at my local photography store and all the rebates on the new Tamron. Tamron has a 6 year warranty so I feel pretty good with that. I have used it hand held nd got OK photos but it's IQ on a tripod is fantastic.
If you use a combination of these three suggestions you can get it done with little outlay of dollars (do 1 and 2) to more expense buying more glass. Just for information I am a Canon long time user but this applies to any camera you are using, in your case a respected Nikon.
One other item I did not touch on is post processing (PP) your image. Most close up photos taken with care for sharpness end up being cropped and having other enhancements to the photo. PP can take you many years of practice or advice from anyone on this site. You should have gotten the Nikon version of PP on one of your CDs. My understanding is that the Nikon software is pretty good. There is also a ton of free PP programs out there. I would suggest you start with the Nikon PP and just learn what you like to do. I would not suggest jumping right in and buying the best PP programs out there. You may find out that you do not need all that power and can do fine with the Nikon or a free download. Don't worry about this presently. Work with what you have and then worry about spending more money.
Greg
lyndacast wrote:
The Nikon 18-300 is a good all round lens. The Tamron 16-300 is also an excellent lens and is a bit cheaper than the Nikon. Also, purchasing a used lens (Amazon and Adorama are my go to dealers) can be q great option.
I have the Tamron which I use on my Nikon 7100 and have gotten some great shots of wildlife with it.
Come on, 50 feet away is too far with that lens if you wish to maximize image quality.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Jim Bob wrote:
"Best". Your opinion, rather than universal truth. Geesus.
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, pardon me oh expert in all things glass. Best for the price is the Nikon 200-500, blows away the Sigma and Tamron, considering your using a Nikon that is.
It is generally accepted that long lenses are the first choice for wildlife photography but it also depends on subject to camera distance. A good example would be visiting the Galapagos Islands in Ecuador where wildlife are so used to humans that practically any lens will do the job.
Nikon makes excellent long tele zooms and depending on reach good choices are the 70-300 VR, the 80-400 VR and the latest 200-500 VR. Other lenses at premium prices can be bought with a single focal length like the 600mm f4 VR or the excellent 200-400 VR zoom.
If visiting National Parks your first choice should be a long tele, zoom or prime.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.