Here's a position paper from a group of conservative Republicans who find Trump's candidacy repugnant and dangerous to the country. An excellent read, if the Trump supporters dare to consider what the authors present!
http://theresurgent.com/the-case-against-trump/I am not a great admirer of Ms Clinton, but in the words of these Republicans she is by far a better choice for the President of the U S and the leader of the free world than is the dangerous demagogue Donald Trump.
GeorgeH wrote:
Here's a position paper from a group of conservative Republicans who find Trump's candidacy repugnant and dangerous to the country. An excellent read, if the Trump supporters dare to consider what the authors present!
http://theresurgent.com/the-case-against-trump/I am not a great admirer of Ms Clinton, but in the words of these Republicans she is by far a better choice for the President of the U S and the leader of the free world than is the dangerous demagogue Donald Trump.
Good article but it was authored by the ones who have a vested interest in the status quo. If they had given at least half the energy in taking down obummer that they are using to try to take down Trump they might have a leg to stand on. Since they didn't, they dont.
Nobody is more dangerous then Clinton!
Phreedom
Loc: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
GeorgeH wrote:
Here's a position paper from a group of conservative Republicans who find Trump's candidacy repugnant and dangerous to the country. An excellent read, if the Trump supporters dare to consider what the authors present!
http://theresurgent.com/the-case-against-trump/I am not a great admirer of Ms Clinton, but in the words of these Republicans she is by far a better choice for the President of the U S and the leader of the free world than is the dangerous demagogue Donald Trump.
Nope, that wasn't what was written.
"(Likewise, but parenthetically at this time, we believe Hillary Clinton also is manifestly unfit for office. We are both #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary. But there are nearly four months available to make the case against Secretary Clinton, and we urgently need somebody other than Trump to make it.)
And "...manifestly unfit..." doesn't mean "...by far a better choice for the President...".
ken hubert wrote:
Good article but it was authored by the ones who have a vested interest in the status quo. If they had given at least half the energy in taking down obummer that they are using to try to take down Trump they might have a leg to stand on. Since they didn't, they dont.
Nobody is more dangerous then Clinton!
Words out,Obummer isn't running.
DaveO wrote:
Words out,Obummer isn't running.
Obviously. If those status quo clowns would have put the energy into going after obummer, obummer wouldn't be where he is now.
green
Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
ken hubert wrote:
Obviously. If those status quo clowns would have put the energy into going after obummer, obummer wouldn't be where he is now.
yeah, we could've repealed the ACA by now (we came so close)
"Trump is terrible – ignorant, and just plain wrong"
Oh Yeah!
This piece was writ by intelligent 3rd graders with nothing to back up a discussion.
Robert Graybeal wrote:
"Trump is terrible – ignorant, and just plain wrong"
Oh Yeah!
This piece was writ by intelligent 3rd graders with nothing to back up a discussion.
Yeah,a real change from most of the posts on this forum!
Robert Graybeal wrote:
"Trump is terrible – ignorant, and just plain wrong"
Oh Yeah!
This piece was writ by intelligent 3rd graders with nothing to back up a discussion.
Would you care to refute the piece?? Inquiring minds are waiting....
[quote=Phreedom]Nope, that wasn't what was written.
"(Likewise, but parenthetically at this time, we believe Hillary Clinton also is manifestly unfit for office. We are both #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary. But there are nearly four months available to make the case against Secretary Clinton, and we urgently need somebody other than Trump to make it.)
Well, do note that I am NOT a great fan of Ms. Clinton. But I feel she is a better choice for President than Demagogue Donald, who represents a real and present danger to the country if elected.
GeorgeH wrote:
Would you care to refute the piece?? Inquiring minds are waiting....
He must have a back up discussion??
Typical reply....a real discussion!
GeorgeH wrote:
Here's a position paper from a group of conservative Republicans who find Trump's candidacy repugnant and dangerous to the country. An excellent read, if the Trump supporters dare to consider what the authors present!
http://theresurgent.com/the-case-against-trump/I am not a great admirer of Ms Clinton, but in the words of these Republicans she is by far a better choice for the President of the U S and the leader of the free world than is the dangerous demagogue Donald Trump.
Did you read the linked to article that you posted? It appears you did not or if you did you really missed or misinterpreted what the article said about Mrs. Clinton and the authors' view of her candidacy and qualification to be president.
You state " but in the words of these Republicans she is by far a better choice for the President of the U S and the leader of the free world than is the dangerous demagogue Donald Trump." Really? They state no such thing in the article. They pretty much state the polar opposite of what you said they stated.
Why would you make that up?
ken hubert wrote:
Good article but it was authored by the ones who have a vested interest in the status quo. If they had given at least half the energy in taking down obummer that they are using to try to take down Trump they might have a leg to stand on. Since they didn't, they dont.
Nobody is more dangerous then Clinton!
Also, no one is as corrupt as Clinton.
Rich
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.