Serious question....serious answers, please: All I hear about 'gun control' is that we need some serious gun control laws. Here is my question for all 'gun grabbers' and 'gun control...

Robert Graybeal Loc: Myrtle Beach

All I hear about 'gun control' is that we need some serious gun control laws.
Here is my question for all 'gun grabbers' and 'gun control nuts':

With 27,700 gun control laws on the books in this here USofA, instead of crying about it, post a suggestion

WHAT LAW WOULD YOU RECOMMEND:

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

As an ex cop, ex corrections officer in Maximum security prisons, male and female and death row, and still a USMC combat veteran my suggestion is for the anti gun people to come up with a law that affects the criminals and mentally insane rather than the law abiding citizens. We already have thousands of laws and the law abiding citizens abide every one them no matter if they own a Browning 50 caliber machine gun, Thompson machine gun, semi auto rifles, handguns or shotguns. Liberals want some type of guarantee that this land will be a utopia and that nothing bad will happen to anyone on the planet. Unfortunately that is not the case. In the recent Orlando shooting the shooter was a known Muslim terrorist sympathizer; he had been investigated twice by the FBI; his father was also known inside the White House. Somebody should have had the balls to keep this person on a watch list. Yet, his name was taken off the watch list. Why, by who? Somewhere there must be some piece of paper that is signed by a person, a human being that says this man is no longer determined to be a threat to the citizens of America. All it would take is for the FBI Director, Comey, to check the records and see who signed the paper saying the Orlando shooter was safe.

Instead of looking at the very minuscule number of crimes where rifles such as the shooter used maybe we should use common sense and take a look at the millions of the same exact rifle and similar rifles in use by honest law abiding American citizens today that have NOT used the firearm or any other firearm to murder anyone, hold up a bank, commit a violent home invasion. The rifles in question are used in less than one percent of crimes in America yet they are the top targeted firearm for Liberals to ban. Why is that?

I keep hearing all the time that the Liberals and especially Obama and Hillary do not want to take away our firearms yet each has made statements that they do. Senator Diane Feinstein, who carries her own firearm, has made a statement as far back as 1995 that she, "Would to have instituted an outright ban on all guns. This was right after the 1994 assault rifles ban was signed by Bill Clinton. Studies since have pointed out that a similar ban would not have any measurable effect on crime because the rifles are rarely used in a crime.

Dennis

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

dennis2146 wrote:

As an ex cop, ex corrections officer in Maximum security prisons, male and female and death row, and still a USMC combat veteran my suggestion is for the anti gun people to come up with a law that affects the criminals and mentally insane rather than the law abiding citizens. We already have thousands of laws and the law abiding citizens abide every one them no matter if they own a Browning 50 caliber machine gun, Thompson machine gun, semi auto rifles, handguns or shotguns. Liberals want some type of guarantee that this land will be a utopia and that nothing bad will happen to anyone on the planet. Unfortunately that is not the case. In the recent Orlando shooting the shooter was a known Muslim terrorist sympathizer; he had been investigated twice by the FBI; his father was also known inside the White House. Somebody should have had the balls to keep this person on a watch list. Yet, his name was taken off the watch list. Why, by who? Somewhere there must be some piece of paper that is signed by a person, a human being that says this man is no longer determined to be a threat to the citizens of America. All it would take is for the FBI Director, Comey, to check the records and see who signed the paper saying the Orlando shooter was safe.

Instead of looking at the very minuscule number of crimes where rifles such as the shooter used maybe we should use common sense and take a look at the millions of the same exact rifle and similar rifles in use by honest law abiding American citizens today that have NOT used the firearm or any other firearm to murder anyone, hold up a bank, commit a violent home invasion. The rifles in question are used in less than one percent of crimes in America yet they are the top targeted firearm for Liberals to ban. Why is that?

I keep hearing all the time that the Liberals and especially Obama and Hillary do not want to take away our firearms yet each has made statements that they do. Senator Diane Feinstein, who carries her own firearm, has made a statement as far back as 1995 that she, "Would to have instituted an outright ban on all guns. This was right after the 1994 assault rifles ban was signed by Bill Clinton. Studies since have pointed out that a similar ban would not have any measurable effect on crime because the rifles are rarely used in a crime.

Dennis

As an ex cop, ex corrections officer in Maximum se... (show quote)

Please don't hold your breath expecting a rational response from any of the Lefties here.
They know that the facts are against them. All they have is lies, misdirection and old refusal to face reality.

gmcase Loc: Galt's Gulch

ken hubert wrote:

Please don't hold your breath expecting a rational response from any of the Lefties here.
They know that the facts are against them. All they have is lies, misdirection and old refusal to face reality.

They know very little but know it loudly.

chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon

dennis2146 wrote:

As an ex cop, ex corrections officer in Maximum security prisons, male and female and death row, and still a USMC combat veteran my suggestion is for the anti gun people to come up with a law that affects the criminals and mentally insane rather than the law abiding citizens. We already have thousands of laws and the law abiding citizens abide every one them no matter if they own a Browning 50 caliber machine gun, Thompson machine gun, semi auto rifles, handguns or shotguns. Liberals want some type of guarantee that this land will be a utopia and that nothing bad will happen to anyone on the planet. Unfortunately that is not the case. In the recent Orlando shooting the shooter was a known Muslim terrorist sympathizer; he had been investigated twice by the FBI; his father was also known inside the White House. Somebody should have had the balls to keep this person on a watch list. Yet, his name was taken off the watch list. Why, by who? Somewhere there must be some piece of paper that is signed by a person, a human being that says this man is no longer determined to be a threat to the citizens of America. All it would take is for the FBI Director, Comey, to check the records and see who signed the paper saying the Orlando shooter was safe.

Instead of looking at the very minuscule number of crimes where rifles such as the shooter used maybe we should use common sense and take a look at the millions of the same exact rifle and similar rifles in use by honest law abiding American citizens today that have NOT used the firearm or any other firearm to murder anyone, hold up a bank, commit a violent home invasion. The rifles in question are used in less than one percent of crimes in America yet they are the top targeted firearm for Liberals to ban. Why is that?

I keep hearing all the time that the Liberals and especially Obama and Hillary do not want to take away our firearms yet each has made statements that they do. Senator Diane Feinstein, who carries her own firearm, has made a statement as far back as 1995 that she, "Would to have instituted an outright ban on all guns. This was right after the 1994 assault rifles ban was signed by Bill Clinton. Studies since have pointed out that a similar ban would not have any measurable effect on crime because the rifles are rarely used in a crime.

Dennis

As an ex cop, ex corrections officer in Maximum se... (show quote)

Well said, Dennis.

It is an oxymoron to say that criminals will obey one more law.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Robert Graybeal wrote:

All I hear about 'gun control' is that we need some serious gun control laws.
Here is my question for all 'gun grabbers' and 'gun control nuts':

With 27,700 gun control laws on the books in this here USofA, instead of crying about it, post a suggestion

WHAT LAW WOULD YOU RECOMMEND:

You start by using pejoratives to address the people that you want serious answers from?

Ask a serious and respectful question and maybe you will get a serious answer. Ask for a fight and you will get a fight. I've got better things to do.

Checkmate Loc: Southern California

Bazbo wrote:

You start by using pejoratives to address the people that you want serious answers from?

Ask a serious and respectful question and maybe you will get a serious answer. Ask for a fight and you will get a fight. I've got better things to do.

Guess we all see you for what you are, a 'gunner grabber' and a 'gun controller' freak.

Robert Graybeal Loc: Myrtle Beach

Bazbo wrote:

You start by using pejoratives to address the people that you want serious answers from?

Ask a serious and respectful question and maybe you will get a serious answer. Ask for a fight and you will get a fight. I've got better things to do.

What do you want me to call them?

You make yourself clear, you have time to make comments but have no intelligent answers.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Robert Graybeal wrote:

What do you want me to call them?

You make yourself clear, you have time to make comments but have no intelligent answers.

Oh for heavens sake, now it's up to me to teach you civility? You should have learned basic social skills and manners at home.

You know perfectly well that the terms you used were basic insults. If you want to engage me (or any serious adult for that matter) on any level, then you need to grow up. Until then,I will leave you to play income little poop pile. Enjoy.

Checkmate Loc: Southern California

Bazbo wrote:

Oh for heavens sake, now it's up to me to teach you civility? You should have learned basic social skills and manners at home.

You know perfectly well that the terms you used were basic insults. If you want to engage me (or any serious adult for that matter) on any level, then you need to grow up. Until then,I will leave you to play income little poop pile. Enjoy.

AMF. QUIT whining and just answer the questions. Is that so hard to do. You libs just constantly make bigger assholes out of yourselves.

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

Bazbo wrote:

Oh for heavens sake, now it's up to me to teach you civility? You should have learned basic social skills and manners at home.

You know perfectly well that the terms you used were basic insults. If you want to engage me (or any serious adult for that matter) on any level, then you need to grow up. Until then,I will leave you to play income little poop pile. Enjoy.

In other words Spaz, you got squat! Keep trying to misdirect the conversation as that's ALL you have got. Forgot, you can scream racism now. That's all you can do now.

gmcase Loc: Galt's Gulch

Bazbo wrote:

You start by using pejoratives to address the people that you want serious answers from?

Ask a serious and respectful question and maybe you will get a serious answer. Ask for a fight and you will get a fight. I've got better things to do.

Accurate adjectives are now pejoratives? Truth needs to be blunted to be acceptable?

In times of widespread deceit the truth truly is offensive to those steeped in deception.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

It appears to be evident that the Liberals on here suffer from a mild case of Hoplophobia.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Bazbo wrote:

You start by using pejoratives to address the people that you want serious answers from?

Ask a serious and respectful question and maybe you will get a serious answer. Ask for a fight and you will get a fight. I've got better things to do.

Apparently you didn't have much better to do.

Do you have a suggestion for a law that will truly stop criminals from obtaining firearms yet won't infringe on the rights of honest citizens?

Dennis

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

dennis2146 wrote:

Apparently you didn't have much better to do.

Do you have a suggestion for a law that will truly stop criminals from obtaining firearms yet won't infringe on the rights of honest citizens?

Dennis

( crickets )