NOT AN AR-15!!!!
The press lied about an AR-15 at Sandy Hook....now Orlando.
The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Of course, the media complex doesn’t care about getting the facts straight. All they care about is driving a narrative while pushing gun control.
All the media cares about is that they’ve wrapped their anti-gun dreams on demonizing the most popular rifle sold in the United States, and they’re going to keep attacking it, whether or not it was used in any particular incident or not.
Interesting. They said it's an AR-15, then lied, claiming it was auto-capable like the similar looking M-16. Not surprising that the Leftist MSM continues to lie.
So they're not quite as dead as we thought they were. That's okay then.
Wellhiem wrote:
So they're not quite as dead as we thought they were. That's okay then.
Are you stupid, or just obtuse? The media is lying as part of a campaign to ban the most popular rifle in America.
The media needs to get behind a campaign to ban tin foil conspiracy theory hats.
The media is lying...to get just the AR-15 banned?
They likely took early reports of an AR-15 and reported such.
And who cares if it was MCX and not an AR-15? Both weapons provide lethality projection in the hands of a terrorist madman.
You making mountain of molehill, maybe just looking for anything to scream about.
Oh the fact that this was a Sig instead of an AR casts a totally different light on this incident.
Get real!!!!
Frank T wrote:
Oh the fact that this was a Sig instead of an AR casts a totally different light on this incident.
Get real!!!!
What he is actually pointing out is the fact that no matter what rifle is or was used, the press will automatically call it an AR15 assault rifle if not an M16. It fits with their antigun agenda and they love to hate the AR15.
ken hubert wrote:
What he is actually pointing out is the fact that no matter what rifle is or was used, the press will automatically call it an AR15 assault rifle if not an M16. It fits with their antigun agenda and they love to hate the AR15.
Are you seriously trying to suggest that the press want to see fewer AR15s and more M16s? There are conspiracy nut jobs, and there are feckin idiots. You surpass both definitions.
Wellhiem wrote:
Are you seriously trying to suggest that the press want to see fewer AR15s and more M16s? There are conspiracy nut jobs, and there are feckin idiots. You surpass both definitions.
No, stupid! Apparently you have major comprehension problems or you really didn't read the post. The press will automatically call any rifle used in a crime an AR15 or M16 as it fits their antigen agenda.
ken hubert wrote:
No, stupid! Apparently you have major comprehension problems or you really didn't read the post. The press will automatically call any rifle used in a crime an AR15 or M16 as it fits their antigen agenda.
And if the called it a Sig, it would be different, because?
Frank T wrote:
And if the called it a Sig, it would be different, because?
They wont. You can bet money on that
Robert Graybeal wrote:
NOT AN AR-15!!!!
The press lied about an AR-15 at Sandy Hook....now Orlando.
The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.
Of course, the media complex doesn’t care about getting the facts straight. All they care about is driving a narrative while pushing gun control.
All the media cares about is that they’ve wrapped their anti-gun dreams on demonizing the most popular rifle sold in the United States, and they’re going to keep attacking it, whether or not it was used in any particular incident or not.
NOT AN AR-15!!!! br The press lied about an AR-15 ... (
show quote)
The reports I saw said "ar 15 type weapon." Probably still not 100% accurate, but really, what does it matter?
Wellhiem wrote:
Are you seriously trying to suggest that the press want to see fewer AR15s and more M16s? There are conspiracy nut jobs, and there are feckin idiots. You surpass both definitions.
And you are a liar, as well as a blockhead. No one supports your idiotic conclusion that the mass media (which is Leftist and anti-gun rights) wants to see more M-16s. Nor can your idiotic conclusion or statement be inferred from anything here or from media statements and bias.
Twardlow wrote:
The reports I saw said "ar 15 type weapon." Probably still not 100% accurate, but really, what does it matter?
actually, it doesn't matter....to a liberal.
they are either to stupid or to hardheaded to comprehend the difference.
they are at war with AR-15's, because they don't know and don't want to know what they are.
an AR-15 is the closest thing to a .22 that there is, it a .223, a SMALL caliber gun.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.