Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
DX mode on FX
May 4, 2012 15:35:02   #
nikonesian Loc: Midwest USA
 
Does the DX mode on FX bodies work, rendering a good quality photograph?

Reply
May 4, 2012 15:35:40   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
The DX mode on an FX body just uses a smaller section of CMOS sensor. This will automatically occur when you attach a designated DX lens. You will see "cropped" image in viewfinder. Captured image will appear to be cropped, as if you had used a longer FX lens. The pixel count used for DX capture is significantly less than full FX sensor, but not that noticeable unless you dramatically crop during PP.

Sensors - Full Frame (FX) vs APS-C (DX) Field-of-View Comparison
Sensors - Full Frame (FX) vs APS-C (DX) Field-of-V...

Reply
May 4, 2012 15:48:54   #
nikonesian Loc: Midwest USA
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
The DX mode on an FX body just uses a smaller section of CMOS sensor. This will automatically occur when you attach a designated DX lens. You will see "cropped" image in viewfinder. Captured image will be cropped as if you had used a longer FX lens.


Thanks. Weird, your post showed up as an * until I quoted you in response.

Back on subject...so there's no difference in quality? Also are the MPs reduced like a 26 MP FX to 13 MP DX?

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2012 15:51:28   #
nikonesian Loc: Midwest USA
 
You answered my question when the full post came through. That's probably what happened with the *.

Reply
May 4, 2012 15:56:23   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
nikonesian wrote:
Weird, your post showed up as an * until I quoted you in response.

Back on subject...so there's no difference in quality? Also are the MPs reduced like a 26 MP FX to 13 MP DX?
I use the * as a bookmark while I compose text. You will now see more added to my post above.

Auto-conversion from FX to DX format will reduce pixels used by about 35%. A 26 Mp FX sensor will use only about 17.3 Mp when in DX mode.

Reply
May 4, 2012 16:00:17   #
nikonesian Loc: Midwest USA
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
nikonesian wrote:
Weird, your post showed up as an * until I quoted you in response.

Back on subject...so there's no difference in quality? Also are the MPs reduced like a 26 MP FX to 13 MP DX?
I use the * as a bookmark while I compose text. You will now see more added to my post above.

Auto-conversion from FX to DX format will reduce pixels used by about 35%. A 26 Mp FX sensor will use only about 17.3 Mp when in DX mode.


Thanks. I just want to make sure my DX lenses are used and useful if I go FF.

Reply
May 5, 2012 08:12:42   #
BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
 
I started with Nikon D70S and bought several lenses for specific things for that format. I then upgraded to both a D300 (DX) and a D3 (FX). I use my lenses interchangeably putting thgether the camera and lense for what I wish to accomplish or what I wish to carry.

Reply
 
 
Aug 10, 2012 23:11:47   #
Pentony Loc: Earth Traveller
 
For those of us like me who are just getting a grasp of DX vs FX, suggest you read the following: http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/fx-dx-future.htm. The Ken Rockwell article was printed in 2008. Also on Yahoo, search "Nikon FX" without the quotes.

Reply
Aug 10, 2012 23:56:55   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Link didn't work for me. Try this http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/fx-dx-future.htm

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.