tainkc wrote:
Man! You have patience that I absolutely do not have. I once did an experiment where I did a stack of 13 and a stack of 3 on the same subject (a small bug in an oblique pose). I saw no real difference. Now I ask you, could you have done it with half that amount and still have a quality that you were seeking or, did you do it just for the fun of it?
In order to include the rather long antenna & the legs on the back side, this was a pretty deep stack, but the short answer is yes, I could have used a few less frames but I feel I get a cleaner stack when I have a little more overlap. I also have a habit of pixel-peeping.