Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Tripod value
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 5, 2016 21:37:35   #
wmurnahan Loc: Bloomington IN
 
Just bought a new tripod. I have a Gitzo Reporter from the 70's but wanted something more portable. It appears to be well made and has some features that I like over the Gitzo, like two position legs allowing for a lower angle, both have a center column that can be reversed to make a copy stand. The new one uses one leg and the center column to make a monopod. The Gitzo does seem a little more stable, with only three sections compared to four. At less than a $100, I thought it was worth a try. http://www.banggood.com/QZSD-Q666-15KG-Tripod-With-Q-02-360-Degree-Swivel-Fluid-Head-For-DSLR-Camera-p-1001622.html

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 22:07:24   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
If you bought a tripod that is less stable than what you already had, you took a step backwards. Tripods are primarily about stability.

--

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 22:43:48   #
Haydon
 
Find it interesting he back-stepped from a Gitzo to this model.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2016 23:08:49   #
traveler90712 Loc: Lake Worth, Fl.
 
Standard Load Capacity: 8kg (17.6lbs) of your proposed tripod.

What is the total weight of your camera and largest lens?

A tripod should support 1.5 to twice the total weight of your camera and largest lens.

The total height of that tripod is only ~ 5 feet.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 00:28:04   #
tinwhistle
 
Just my very personal opinion, but any tripod that costs only $100.00 is probably worth only a hundred dollars. In other words, not much. Just went back and took another look at your post and went back again to your link and found something interesting. You're from Bloomington Indiana, USA. It gets cold and snowy there and the legs on that tripod have the twist type locks. That maybe a problem in winter weather.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 05:04:16   #
waegwan Loc: Mae Won Li
 
wmurnahan wrote:
Just bought a new tripod. I have a Gitzo Reporter from the 70's but wanted something more portable. It appears to be well made and has some features that I like over the Gitzo, like two position legs allowing for a lower angle, both have a center column that can be reversed to make a copy stand. The new one uses one leg and the center column to make a monopod. The Gitzo does seem a little more stable, with only three sections compared to four. At less than a $100, I thought it was worth a try. http://www.banggood.com/QZSD-Q666-15KG-Tripod-With-Q-02-360-Degree-Swivel-Fluid-Head-For-DSLR-Camera-p-1001622.html
Just bought a new tripod. I have a Gitzo Reporter ... (show quote)


It just depends on your intentions and expectations are. I have a similar tripod I bought in Korea for about $80. I keep in the saddlebags on my motorcycle. It has come in handy several times for selfi group photos with a lightweight lens. If you don't overload it, it should work fine for its intended purpose. :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 05:50:28   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
waegwan wrote:
It just depends on your intentions and expectations are. I have a similar tripod I bought in Korea for about $80. I keep in the saddlebags on my motorcycle. It has come in handy several times for selfi group photos with a lightweight lens. If you don't overload it, it should work fine for its intended purpose. :thumbup:


True.
I had two tripods; one that was a monster for when i needed rock solid stability and suffered with the lack of ease and portability, and the other for most every day when I just needed to get the camera stabilized without a bunch of hassle.

The lighter tripod worked just great and it was only $85.00. No problems at all with my 5DIII and L lenses.


Tripod discussions are like raw vs jpg discussions...lots of heated opinions and nobody allowing much in the way of differing opinions.

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2016 07:37:56   #
RKL349 Loc: Connecticut
 
rpavich wrote:
True.
I had two tripods; one that was a monster for when i needed rock solid stability and suffered with the lack of ease and portability, and the other for most every day when I just needed to get the camera stabilized without a bunch of hassle.

The lighter tripod worked just great and it was only $85.00. No problems at all with my 5DIII and L lenses.


Tripod discussions are like raw vs jpg discussions...lots of heated opinions and nobody allowing much in the way of differing opinions.
True. br I had two tripods; one that was a monste... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 07:50:09   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Bill_de wrote:
If you bought a tripod that is less stable than what you already had, you took a step backwards. Tripods are primarily about stability.

--


You are forgetting the issue of portability. What use is the most stable tripod if you can't bring it with you because of its overbearing size and weight? Oftentimes it's better to have a less stable but portable tripod than none at all.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 08:21:30   #
waegwan Loc: Mae Won Li
 
rook2c4 wrote:
You are forgetting the issue of portability. What use is the most stable tripod if you can't bring it with you because of its overbearing size and weight? Oftentimes it's better to have a less stable but portable tripod than none at all.


Yup, I have a monster duty tripod I keep at home and a medium monster duty in my truck. When I ride I usually shoot from my bike so I am traveling light anyway and on occasion have used my light tripod with great success. It is like anything else, know your equipment and use it as it was intended. :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 09:35:10   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
I have a tripod very similar to this one from Koolehaoda but mine is carbon fiber. Links below for both the aluminum and carbon fiber types. These tripod are probably the same (made in the same factory) and rebranded.

http://www.amazon.com/Koolehaoda-Professional-Portable-Magnesium-Aluminium/dp/B00OT5G0DS/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1457274732&sr=1-1&keywords=koolehaoda+tripod

http://www.amazon.com/Koolehaoda-Portable-Ballhead-Samsung-Olympus/dp/B00LUUHDPO/ref=sr_1_10?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1457274732&sr=1-10&keywords=koolehaoda+tripod

I like mine very much. Strong but light weight great for backpacking. If I wanted a really heavy duty unit I'd be spending well over $500.00 for a tripod but for what I use it for it's not necessary. I use a d7200 with a Sigma 180 Macro with reasonable stability.

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2016 10:06:26   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
rook2c4 wrote:
You are forgetting the issue of portability. What use is the most stable tripod if you can't bring it with you because of its overbearing size and weight? Oftentimes it's better to have a less stable but portable tripod than none at all.


What I was going to say.
Thanks.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 10:29:25   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
Enjoy your new pair of legs. It should work well for you.
wmurnahan wrote:
Just bought a new tripod. I have a Gitzo Reporter from the 70's but wanted something more portable. It appears to be well made and has some features that I like over the Gitzo, like two position legs allowing for a lower angle, both have a center column that can be reversed to make a copy stand. The new one uses one leg and the center column to make a monopod. The Gitzo does seem a little more stable, with only three sections compared to four. At less than a $100, I thought it was worth a try. http://www.banggood.com/QZSD-Q666-15KG-Tripod-With-Q-02-360-Degree-Swivel-Fluid-Head-For-DSLR-Camera-p-1001622.html
Just bought a new tripod. I have a Gitzo Reporter ... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 10:43:48   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
traveler90712 wrote:
Standard Load Capacity: 8kg (17.6lbs) of your proposed tripod.

What is the total weight of your camera and largest lens?

A tripod should support 1.5 to twice the total weight of your camera and largest lens.

The total height of that tripod is only ~ 5 feet.


load capacity means nothing. The cheapest tripod will hold up a camera, but it will be far from stable. Unfortunately this is common, but bad advice that has taken on a life of it's own.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 10:47:47   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
rpavich wrote:
True.
I had two tripods; one that was a monster for when i needed rock solid stability and suffered with the lack of ease and portability, and the other for most every day when I just needed to get the camera stabilized without a bunch of hassle.

The lighter tripod worked just great and it was only $85.00. No problems at all with my 5DIII and L lenses.


Tripod discussions are like raw vs jpg discussions...lots of heated opinions and nobody allowing much in the way of differing opinions.
True. br I had two tripods; one that was a monste... (show quote)


This is informative. But you need to read all three sections.

http://blog.reallyrightstuff.com/choosing-a-tripod-part-1/

And pp 14-15 of the Gtizo manual which basically says the same thing about stability and design criteria

http://www.gitzo.com/service/request+a+catalog

Look at the data, and find a tripod with similar characteristics - you'll save money (50% or more), and save again by not buying junk.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.