Canon Wide Angle Lens Suggestions
Mar 4, 2016 14:34:16 #
I have been wanting to purchase a wide angle lens for my Canon EOS for some time, but there are so many choices that I really get confused. Someone correct me if I am wrong, but if my camera has a C size sensor, the crop factor is 1.5, so if I want a wide angle lens I will need to have a lens at 10mm or less to do what I want it to do, which is to have a wider field of vision in landscape photos. I have an 18-135 lens and the 18mm is OK, but would like a lens that gives a bit wider field of view. I have looked at Canon lenses but they are pricy. Does anyone have any suggestions as to other lenses that they have or know about that would meet my needs? I definately do not want a fisheye lens. Thanks for any help any of you can give me.
Mar 4, 2016 14:47:10 #
Look at some of the 3rd party lenses like Tokina, Tamron, Sigma. Lots of choices.
I have a Tokina 12-24 and it is ok, however there are better lenses around nowdays.
I have a Tokina 12-24 and it is ok, however there are better lenses around nowdays.
Mar 4, 2016 14:54:06 #
Mar 4, 2016 14:57:19 #
AuntieM wrote:
I have been wanting to purchase a wide angle lens ... (show quote)
You have described what you need / want accurately.
On the Canon front the 10 - 22mm is excellent, a little pricey, but used or refurb might squeak in. It is regarded as being close to L quality, but is an EF-S lens for the APS-C family from Rebels up to the 7D mk II. I have one and am very happy with it.
More recent and lower cost is the EF-S 10 - 18 IS which is not quite the same build quality as the 10 - 22mm, is around half the price, yet still very well regarded optically. Several UHH members have that lens and have commented very positively about it.
The crop factor for Canon APS-C is 1.6x, 1.5x is Nikon.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-10-18mm-4-5-5-6-Filters-Camera/dp/B00KIVFSCQ should give you an idea. These are rectilinear lenses, not fisheye.
Mar 4, 2016 14:58:51 #
Mar 4, 2016 15:01:15 #
Old Timer
Loc: Greenfield, In.
The Canon 12 18 is a good lens if you are wanting something economical. I bought one about Christmas time refurbished and it seems to do a good job. I have not used it much but you need to get practice as it will picture thins in that are in your near peripheral vision.
Mar 4, 2016 16:09:21 #
Yackers
Loc: Norfolk, UK
+1 for the Canon 10-20 - I used one on my 7D and I was very happy with it. The only reason I sold the lens was because I moved to a full frame 6D for my landscape photography and the 10-20 wouldn't work.
DOn't buy cheap you'll buy twice. Trust me, I have been there and done that. Save up a bit longer and get the 10-20 in the first instance - I can guarantee you won't regret it.
DOn't buy cheap you'll buy twice. Trust me, I have been there and done that. Save up a bit longer and get the 10-20 in the first instance - I can guarantee you won't regret it.
Mar 4, 2016 16:12:28 #
Yackers wrote:
+1 for the Canon 10-20 - I used one on my 7D and I was very happy with it. The only reason I sold the lens was because I moved to a full frame 6D for my landscape photography and the 10-20 wouldn't work.
DOn't buy cheap you'll buy twice. Trust me, I have been there and done that. Save up a bit longer and get the 10-20 in the first instance - I can guarantee you won't regret it.
DOn't buy cheap you'll buy twice. Trust me, I have been there and done that. Save up a bit longer and get the 10-20 in the first instance - I can guarantee you won't regret it.
Sort of agree with the sentiment, but the Canon 10-18 has many good photographers that think it is equally good, just not quite as robust...
I think the issue is that ultra wide lenses are generally expensive because they are optically quite demanding. The 10 -18 scores well in the optical ratings and the smaller range makes that a bit easier.
On the other hand - slightly off topic - the Samyang (Rokinon et al) 8mm fisheye is optically excellent for the money and can be found quite inexpensively, I got mine for under $200 new.
Mar 4, 2016 18:57:08 #
AuntieM wrote:
When I had a Rebel, I used a Sigma 10-20mm; I didn't use it very much, but it met my needs and budget, so I really missed it when I switched to Pentax ... until I found the same lens in a K-mount.I have been wanting to purchase a wide angle lens ... (show quote)
Mar 4, 2016 19:07:54 #
I only use L lenses, so I have the 17-40 f/4 that can also be used for macro shooting.
Mar 5, 2016 05:58:06 #
Peterff wrote:
You have described what you need / want accurately... (show quote)
I got the 10-18mm and love it. yes it is not built like a tank but still has excellent build quality. Takes very sharp photos and is light. There are other brands like Sigma that are excellent as well but for the money it is hard to beat the 10-18mm.
Mar 5, 2016 07:53:16 #
AuntieM wrote:
I have been wanting to purchase a wide angle lens ... (show quote)
Samyang, Rokinon 14mm MANUAL is a wonderful lens. Would be in the 22mm equivalent fov. Nice price, too. Available for Canon. It's a FF lens, too! Not a fish eye.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HAF167Y?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o05_s00
Mar 5, 2016 08:46:13 #
AuntieM wrote:
I have been wanting to purchase a wide angle lens ... (show quote)
For a crop sensor camera - the Canon 10 ~ 18mm lens is an excellent buy at only £180 in UK - cheaper in US. It is light but takes very good pictures and benefits from a silent focusing motor and image stabilization (yes it can be useful on an Ultra Wide Angle Lens).
Check back on posts by myself and others over the last few months and you will find several example images.
Since purchasing in November the lens has practically stayed on the camera as I have revisited local places for new viewpoints.
Mar 5, 2016 09:06:15 #
Get a Canon lens. The 10-22mm is fantastic - see:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-221396-1.html
The 10-18 is about half the price at $300, the body is lighter (made of plastic) but everything I have seen here indicates that the glass is very good. You will not be dissapointed!
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-221396-1.html
The 10-18 is about half the price at $300, the body is lighter (made of plastic) but everything I have seen here indicates that the glass is very good. You will not be dissapointed!
Mar 5, 2016 09:11:16 #
The Sigma 10-20 mm is a very good lens at a reasonable price. It should satisfy your needs.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.