Horeshead Nebula
Feb 26, 2016 16:06:02 #
This was just an after shot when I was done with the Flame Nebula.
The Horeshead is not easy to process I know I overcooked this but I only had 3 Lights at 180 sec, ISO 320 to work with.
I would have prefered ISO 200. It was real hard to get rid of some of the Noise.
Nikon D600 Modified to IR 626nm, Celestron 9.25" Scope 2400mm, Orion StarShoot Autoguider.
Craig
The Horeshead is not easy to process I know I overcooked this but I only had 3 Lights at 180 sec, ISO 320 to work with.
I would have prefered ISO 200. It was real hard to get rid of some of the Noise.
Nikon D600 Modified to IR 626nm, Celestron 9.25" Scope 2400mm, Orion StarShoot Autoguider.
Craig
Feb 26, 2016 16:23:40 #
CraigFair wrote:
This was just an after shot when I was done with the Flame Nebula.
The Horeshead is not easy to process I know I overcooked this but I only had 3 Lights at 180 sec, ISO 320 to work with.
I would have prefered ISO 200. It was real hard to get rid of some of the Noise.
Nikon D600 Modified to IR 626nm, Celestron 9.25" Scope 2400mm, Orion StarShoot Autoguider.
Craig
The Horeshead is not easy to process I know I overcooked this but I only had 3 Lights at 180 sec, ISO 320 to work with.
I would have prefered ISO 200. It was real hard to get rid of some of the Noise.
Nikon D600 Modified to IR 626nm, Celestron 9.25" Scope 2400mm, Orion StarShoot Autoguider.
Craig
Nice Craig.
Your getting closer with your new stuff pretty quickly.
At least now I have an idea where these are and can work on pulling some of this stuff out to.
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Feb 26, 2016 16:41:42 #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Nice Craig.
Your getting closer with your new stuff pretty quickly.
At least now I have an idea where these are and can work on pulling some of this stuff out to.
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Your getting closer with your new stuff pretty quickly.
At least now I have an idea where these are and can work on pulling some of this stuff out to.
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Thank you very much Jim.
And good luck with you Modified T2i.
I would love to see some thru your 11"
There is plenty of small things out there it could pull in.
Craig
Feb 26, 2016 17:02:26 #
SDB777
Loc: Edwards, AR USA
I'll ask, because I do not know....
Is this stacking the same mathematically as say stacking photo's to get 'blurred waterfalls'?
I guess I should be more specific, does this reduce the noise the same way? Three photo's at 320 = ISO 107
Scott (a lot of purple) B
Is this stacking the same mathematically as say stacking photo's to get 'blurred waterfalls'?
I guess I should be more specific, does this reduce the noise the same way? Three photo's at 320 = ISO 107
Scott (a lot of purple) B
Feb 26, 2016 17:36:20 #
SDB777 wrote:
I'll ask, because I do not know....
Is this stacking the same mathematically as say stacking photo's to get 'blurred waterfalls'?
I guess I should be more specific, does this reduce the noise the same way? Three photo's at 320 = ISO 107
Scott (a lot of purple) B
Is this stacking the same mathematically as say stacking photo's to get 'blurred waterfalls'?
I guess I should be more specific, does this reduce the noise the same way? Three photo's at 320 = ISO 107
Scott (a lot of purple) B
Thanks for looking in Scott and I've looked at you HDR waterfall stacks, and they are beautiful by the way.
I am going to give that a try in Lightroom and see what happens. It wouldn't Merge, oh well.
But I do not know the answer to your question. I don't quite understand it.
Hopefully someone else does.
Craig
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.