Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
People Photography
Highlights and shadows-newborn photography
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 25, 2016 20:39:04   #
MaggieMay1978 Loc: Calgary Alberta
 
Shot with 50mm 1.2 at 1.8 1/160 ISO 100 with a single strobe. CC


(Download)

Reply
Feb 25, 2016 20:49:15   #
SnappyHappy Loc: Chapin, SC “The Capitol of Lake Murray”
 
Wonderfully done Maggie :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 25, 2016 20:51:56   #
tainkc Loc: Kansas City
 
What ever you do, please do not become angry with me. When I first opened this up, I thought I was looking at one of those fetus in the womb type of photos. When I looked at it more, it still looks that way. It is nothing that you did wrong, it is just how it appears to me. Another thing; regardless of what I just said, this not one of your better ones anyway. I don't know if the softness is over done, or the lighting may be too harsh or lit wrong or what. This just my sense of how I took this one in.

Tom

Reply
 
 
Feb 26, 2016 06:47:29   #
waltchilds Loc: Central Florida
 
Nice shot, MaggieMay, love it.

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 08:54:55   #
jaysnave Loc: Central Ohio
 
tainkc wrote:
What ever you do, please do not become angry with me. When I first opened this up, I thought I was looking at one of those fetus in the womb type of photos. When I looked at it more, it still looks that way. It is nothing that you did wrong, it is just how it appears to me. Another thing; regardless of what I just said, this not one of your better ones anyway. I don't know if the softness is over done, or the lighting may be too harsh or lit wrong or what. This just my sense of how I took this one in.

Tom
What ever you do, please do not become angry with ... (show quote)



Tom I think I have it figured out. I "took it in" kind of the same way you did. For me it was the perspective on the hands. They look too big from that angle. HOWEVER, here is the problem. You and I are too far removed from the newborn experience. My daughter walked by and commented that it was a wonderful precious image and shut up about the hands. They are supposed to look like that. Moms love pics like that. So great job Maggie! Don't get angry at Tom. He just does not totally get it like me and we should disqualify ourselves :)

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 11:20:44   #
MaggieMay1978 Loc: Calgary Alberta
 
tainkc wrote:
What ever you do, please do not become angry with me. When I first opened this up, I thought I was looking at one of those fetus in the womb type of photos. When I looked at it more, it still looks that way. It is nothing that you did wrong, it is just how it appears to me. Another thing; regardless of what I just said, this not one of your better ones anyway. I don't know if the softness is over done, or the lighting may be too harsh or lit wrong or what. This just my sense of how I took this one in.

Tom
What ever you do, please do not become angry with ... (show quote)


Thank you for your take on the image, much appreciated!

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 11:21:18   #
MaggieMay1978 Loc: Calgary Alberta
 
jaysnave wrote:
Tom I think I have it figured out. I "took it in" kind of the same way you did. For me it was the perspective on the hands. They look too big from that angle. HOWEVER, here is the problem. You and I are too far removed from the newborn experience. My daughter walked by and commented that it was a wonderful precious image and shut up about the hands. They are supposed to look like that. Moms love pics like that. So great job Maggie! Don't get angry at Tom. He just does not totally get it like me and we should disqualify ourselves :)
Tom I think I have it figured out. I "took i... (show quote)


Thank you Jaysnave!

Reply
 
 
Feb 26, 2016 11:53:06   #
WAR10CK Loc: Blacklick, OH
 
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 16:19:29   #
bkyser Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
 
Maggie,
For what it's worth, I love the lighting, and the shadows :), I like the hands, I think the softness is great. The only thing that makes it seem just a little off, is that it seems to be an unnatural position for a newborn to be upright. I tilted my head (I could have grabbed my monitor and turned it on it's side...kidding) and seeing the little one on his/her back, immediately made me feel more relaxed. It is almost like the upright position gives me a feeling of tension.

I'm a fan of the portraits you've posted here, and this is just my opinion. I do occasionally do newborn photos, but tell people up front, it isn't my favorite thing to do, I'm just not as good at it as you. Once they are able to sit up, and interact with me, I get much more comfortable... Only sharing this, so you know that I don't consider myself an expert in newborn photography (by any stretch of the imagination), so take my suggestion with a grain of salt, or swig of milk, or...

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 16:24:01   #
MaggieMay1978 Loc: Calgary Alberta
 
bkyser wrote:
Maggie,
For what it's worth, I love the lighting, and the shadows :), I like the hands, I think the softness is great. The only thing that makes it seem just a little off, is that it seems to be an unnatural position for a newborn to be upright. I tilted my head (I could have grabbed my monitor and turned it on it's side...kidding) and seeing the little one on his/her back, immediately made me feel more relaxed. It is almost like the upright position gives me a feeling of tension.

I'm a fan of the portraits you've posted here, and this is just my opinion. I do occasionally do newborn photos, but tell people up front, it isn't my favorite thing to do, I'm just not as good at it as you. Once they are able to sit up, and interact with me, I get much more comfortable... Only sharing this, so you know that I don't consider myself an expert in newborn photography (by any stretch of the imagination), so take my suggestion with a grain of salt, or swig of milk, or...
Maggie, br For what it's worth, I love the lightin... (show quote)


is this version better?


(Download)

Reply
Feb 26, 2016 17:12:58   #
jaysnave Loc: Central Ohio
 
Oh yeah. Good call Bob.

Reply
 
 
Feb 29, 2016 10:01:29   #
bkyser Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
 
MaggieMay1978 wrote:
is this version better?


In my opinion, yes, much better to me. It is your image, so I'm only offering suggestions.

This one just makes me feel more relaxed. If that makes sense?

I still say it is beautiful.

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 17:18:10   #
OriginalCyn Loc: Connecticut
 
MaggieMay1978 wrote:
is this version better?


Yes yes yes! I too was only "bothered" by the angle. You nailed it on the second image. I still love the little one in the first image....there is something infinitely precious about every baby.

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 18:00:02   #
tainkc Loc: Kansas City
 
That 2nd image is way cool! I wish you were here on Sunday. We could have used you - twins.

Reply
Mar 1, 2016 08:49:09   #
bkyser Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
 
tainkc wrote:
That 2nd image is way cool! I wish you were here on Sunday. We could have used you - twins.


Come on Tom, I'm sure you made some outstanding images of those 2. Just because I'm hard on you :twisted: , doesn't mean that you don't do some really awesome portraits. When in doubt, go back to your first posts.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
People Photography
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.