Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
M 63 - Sunflower Galaxy
Feb 21, 2016 14:16:54   #
nikonshooter Loc: Spartanburg, South Carolina
 
A more faint Galaxy in the M51 group. I just had to add a few diffraction spikes.

I was using the D800e, 400 second exposures kept 35 - from 8:00 until 4:30. Guided with PhD2. 30 darks, 120 bias and 120 flats. Processed in PixInsight and Photoshop. The image is clearly in need of more data. I plan (next decent night) to add another 35 subs to the stack and see if can get more data and less noise....or data ruined by noise. I was at 640 ISO.

On another note. I have SkyFi (Celestron Wifi) but why wouldn't this work.

https://gridconnect.com/wifi-serial-adapter.html?gdftrk=gdfV25227_a_7c1592_a_7c6907_a_7c1043&utm_source=google&utm_medium=CPC&utm_term=&utm_campaign=Shopping:%20%5BPLA%5D%20%20-%20All%20Products%20General%20All&mm_campaign=477cea803cb14c83d8a99b6c7d0cd349&keyword=&mkwid=syWXahyjT_dc%7Cpcrid%7C59302249153&gclid=CjwKEAiA3aW2BRCD_cOo5oCFuUMSJADiIMILbGWQLlS7wbhCoOYwxOGCQCMHKPo_7NhIwxtckGHtIxoCsinw_wcB

M63 - Sunflower Galaxy
M63 - Sunflower Galaxy...
(Download)

Reply
Feb 21, 2016 18:11:58   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
nikonshooter wrote:
A more faint Galaxy in the M51 group. I just had to add a few diffraction spikes.

I was using the D800e, 400 second exposures kept 35 - from 8:00 until 4:30. Guided with PhD2. 30 darks, 120 bias and 120 flats. Processed in PixInsight and Photoshop. The image is clearly in need of more data. I plan (next decent night) to add another 35 subs to the stack and see if can get more data and less noise....or data ruined by noise. I was at 640 ISO.

On another note. I have SkyFi (Celestron Wifi) but why wouldn't this work.

https://gridconnect.com/wifi-serial-adapter.html?gdftrk=gdfV25227_a_7c1592_a_7c6907_a_7c1043&utm_source=google&utm_medium=CPC&utm_term=&utm_campaign=Shopping:%20%5BPLA%5D%20%20-%20All%20Products%20General%20All&mm_campaign=477cea803cb14c83d8a99b6c7d0cd349&keyword=&mkwid=syWXahyjT_dc%7Cpcrid%7C59302249153&gclid=CjwKEAiA3aW2BRCD_cOo5oCFuUMSJADiIMILbGWQLlS7wbhCoOYwxOGCQCMHKPo_7NhIwxtckGHtIxoCsinw_wcB
A more faint Galaxy in the M51 group. I just had ... (show quote)

I'll reply to this one Ed, I think you have done an excellent job on the M63

Reply
Feb 21, 2016 20:55:33   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
Very nice shot Ed. I've thought about shooting this but haven't gotten around to it yet.
I look forward to seeing the finished product just because I know you will add more to it.
Nice job again.
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Now I looked at the adapter, it won't connect to my AVX mount. The mount doesn't have a 9 pin input for signal.
That is a nice price for an WiFi adapter however.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2016 21:19:06   #
nikonshooter Loc: Spartanburg, South Carolina
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Very nice shot Ed. I've thought about shooting this but haven't gotten around to it yet.
I look forward to seeing the finished product just because I know you will add more to it.
Nice job again.
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Now I looked at the adapter, it won't connect to my AVX mount. The mount doesn't have a 9 pin input for signal.
That is a nice price for an WiFi adapter however.


I am not technical enough to know. But I would have thought, connecting to the AUX port via a cable would be like my connecting SkyLink to the Aux port. But again, I am not very technical!

Reply
Feb 21, 2016 21:30:58   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
nikonshooter wrote:
A more faint Galaxy in the M51 group. I just had to add a few diffraction spikes.

I was using the D800e, 400 second exposures kept 35 - from 8:00 until 4:30. Guided with PhD2. 30 darks, 120 bias and 120 flats. Processed in PixInsight and Photoshop. The image is clearly in need of more data. I plan (next decent night) to add another 35 subs to the stack and see if can get more data and less noise....or data ruined by noise. I was at 640 ISO.

On another note. I have SkyFi (Celestron Wifi) but why wouldn't this work.

https://gridconnect.com/wifi-serial-adapter.html?gdftrk=gdfV25227_a_7c1592_a_7c6907_a_7c1043&utm_source=google&utm_medium=CPC&utm_term=&utm_campaign=Shopping:%20%5BPLA%5D%20%20-%20All%20Products%20General%20All&mm_campaign=477cea803cb14c83d8a99b6c7d0cd349&keyword=&mkwid=syWXahyjT_dc%7Cpcrid%7C59302249153&gclid=CjwKEAiA3aW2BRCD_cOo5oCFuUMSJADiIMILbGWQLlS7wbhCoOYwxOGCQCMHKPo_7NhIwxtckGHtIxoCsinw_wcB
A more faint Galaxy in the M51 group. I just had ... (show quote)


This turned out really good. Amazing what a stack of good images can produce!

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 04:50:37   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Beautiful, Ed!

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 06:15:55   #
Oknoder Loc: Western North Dakota
 
I shot this same subject last year, but nowhere as nice as your image. Well done. I love the data you have managed to collect already.

One thing I have had minor success with is binning the data. With the 36MP you still retain a great amount of data with the benefit of suppressing the noise. Do you need to use filters to gain 400s of exposure?

Matthew

Reply
 
 
Feb 22, 2016 08:14:50   #
nikonshooter Loc: Spartanburg, South Carolina
 
Oknoder wrote:
I shot this same subject last year, but nowhere as nice as your image. Well done. I love the data you have managed to collect already.

One thing I have had minor success with is binning the data. With the 36MP you still retain a great amount of data with the benefit of suppressing the noise. Do you need to use filters to gain 400s of exposure?


Matthew



I use two filters, Baader IR-CUT Moon and Skyglow and a Baader I-Booster USHC-S- Filter. Neither of these are limiting much if any light.

Using the F/10 8 Inch at 640 ISO required a 400 second exposure to move the histogram left of center.

I do have one regret and for this I might start over. I wish I would have lowered the ISO to 100 and changed the exposure to 1600 seconds. But I already have 35 usable images but the S/N ratio is lousy as you can see. I hate starting over trying to accumulate 40 plus images at 1600 which will take several nights. I agree with the binning recommendation is solid but as a rule, and in the past, I could always come up with a "noise reduction plan in PS" if I have the data. But with this latest struggle, nothing I tried to do was all that good, IMHO.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.