Lens Selection for Nikon D750
Feb 10, 2016 22:56:22 #
MtnMan wrote:
Probably not the same one. The f4 rates substantially better than the 3.5-5.6.
I was talking about the f4. I never did own the 3.5 - 5.6.
Feb 10, 2016 23:39:20 #
I have a D750 with the 24-120 f4 lens. I really like the focal length range. I use it as a general purpose lens, for landscapes, and for portraits. Not a fast lens, so I'll use an 85 1.8d or a 70-200 f2.8 for shallower DOF. I recommend keeping it and using it.
For ultra-wide, I use the 17-35 f2.8. It's heavy, but not as long as the 16-35 and takes 77mm filters. I don't use stabilization on wide angle lenses; usually for landscapes I use a tripod. It's a good real-estate lens as well.
An interesting comparison by Ken Rockwell (I know, grain of sand and all, but it's worth reading) is at:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/images1/16-35mm/compared.htm
For ultra-wide, I use the 17-35 f2.8. It's heavy, but not as long as the 16-35 and takes 77mm filters. I don't use stabilization on wide angle lenses; usually for landscapes I use a tripod. It's a good real-estate lens as well.
An interesting comparison by Ken Rockwell (I know, grain of sand and all, but it's worth reading) is at:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/images1/16-35mm/compared.htm
Feb 11, 2016 00:36:02 #
chemdoc wrote:
I am looking to upgrade my Canon T4i to a Nikon D7... (show quote)
The Nikon 24-120mm f/4 is a very good lens and produces very good results in the f/5.6 to f/8 range. For $300 it is a bargain and easy to recommend. The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 is one of the best zoom lenses Nikon produces, it is noticeably sharper, but is that worth an extra $1500, only you can answer that question. I own the 24/120mm f/4 and enjoy using it, but I would love to have the 24-70mm f/2.8, I just can't justify the extra expense.
Feb 11, 2016 01:11:02 #
I have a d800 and have been looking at the 18-35 3.5-4.5 DXO likes it better than the others and it is Hundreds less. In the late 1980's I met "Moose" Peterson. He is a Nikon Guy and I respect his opinion. He is very fond of the 24-120 F4. You can check this website. I would not discount that lens. I'm a Nikon guy so am not familiar with the T4i. I think it is a crop frame so a 1.6X effective lens factor so unless you are shooting at 15mm or less regularly you may find that the 24-120 is all you need. Last note if you don't like the 24-120 I'll give you the $300 for it:) (being a smart***)
Feb 11, 2016 06:27:15 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
chemdoc wrote:
I am looking to upgrade my Canon T4i to a Nikon D7... (show quote)
I have owned or currently own all three lenses. 24-70, 24-120, and the 16-35. Most of the time I shoot the 16-35 f4 for landscape, I shoot the 24-120 for everything else. You cannot go wrong for the price of the combo with the 24-120. Buy it and next year buy the 16-35, both are outstanding lenses. Good luck. Or, buy the package, sell the 24-120 new on ebay and then buy you 16-35.
Feb 11, 2016 06:27:50 #
guitarbts
Loc: Charlotte, NC
I have the D750 and the 16-35 f/4, the 24-120 f/4, and the 70-200 f/2.8 along with many other lenses. I wouldn't part with any of the 3. I also have the 200-500 another great lens. On the 24 -120 I think you will come to really appreciate the extra reach over the 24-70 and the weight savings.
Feb 11, 2016 07:36:43 #
chemdoc wrote:
The D750 currently comes bundled with the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Lens for only $300 more than the price of the body alone on B&H while the lens alone costs $1100.
Phil
Phil
That $300 lens has been selling for considerabble more on ebay, if you decide you don't need it.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_sacat=0&_nkw=NIKKOR%2024-120mm&LH_Complete=1&LH_Sold=1&rt=nc&_trksid=p2045573.m1684
The 24-70mm is a great lens.
Read some comparisons before you spend your money.
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/lenses
http://lenshero.com/lens-comparison
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx
http://www.lenstip.com/lenses.html
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare
Feb 11, 2016 07:56:19 #
The National Geographic photographer, Micheal Melford, switched from a Canon system to a Nikon system when the D800 and D800E were released. He bought one of each. He, also, bought the 16-35 f4, the 24-120 f4, and the 70-200 f4. He bought all the extenders too. He didn't want any parking lot glass, anymore.
I have exactly what he bought. I figured, if it was good enough for him, it was more than good enough for me.
I have not bought the extenders, but I probably will.
I have exactly what he bought. I figured, if it was good enough for him, it was more than good enough for me.
I have not bought the extenders, but I probably will.
Feb 11, 2016 07:58:24 #
I agree the 24-120 is a no brainer it's a sweet lens, sharp as a tack. I also have the 17-35 2.8 love it.
Feb 11, 2016 08:37:55 #
i have the d750 with several lenses. my walk around lens is the 28-300, i have a friend who has the 24-120 and loves that lens.
i recently was deciding on a wide angle. i opted for the nikon 16mm fisheye. i have used the lens correction to straighten it out and it works well. i recently heard about the rokinon lenses and decided to try the wide angle. i got the 14 mm, for $320. it is a manual focus lens, definitely serves my purpose. i am really happy with this lens.
i recently was deciding on a wide angle. i opted for the nikon 16mm fisheye. i have used the lens correction to straighten it out and it works well. i recently heard about the rokinon lenses and decided to try the wide angle. i got the 14 mm, for $320. it is a manual focus lens, definitely serves my purpose. i am really happy with this lens.
Feb 11, 2016 08:39:37 #
When I purchased my D750, I purchased the 24-120 f/4 lens with it (bundled price). Love that lens and I use it when I shoot indoors.
I also purchased the Nikon 28-300 f/3.5-f/5.6 which I use when I am outdoors and need the longer reach.
Both lenses are great (the D750 is Awesome). So if you see me with my D750, inside mostly use the 24-120 and outside mostly use the 28-300.
I also purchased the Nikon 28-300 f/3.5-f/5.6 which I use when I am outdoors and need the longer reach.
Both lenses are great (the D750 is Awesome). So if you see me with my D750, inside mostly use the 24-120 and outside mostly use the 28-300.
Feb 11, 2016 08:53:41 #
Feb 11, 2016 09:00:35 #
chemdoc wrote:
I am looking to upgrade my Canon T4i to a Nikon D7... (show quote)
The 24-120 mm f/4 is a great lens. David Busch, noted photography author and photographer, highly endorses it. For $300, it is a no-brainier. Get it. For something wider, the new Nikon 20mm f 1.8 may be a great choice at some point down the line. Enjoy the new equipment.
Feb 11, 2016 09:08:50 #
chemdoc wrote:
I am looking to upgrade my Canon T4i to a Nikon D7... (show quote)
The 24-70 is simply my go-to lens, and it works ever so well for so much of my shooting. I believe the 16-35 to be one of the most under-rated lenses Nikon makes. ALL lenses made today are better than they used to be, but there are some of them that just stand out. Put some great glass in front of that fine camera. You won't regret it.
Feb 11, 2016 09:19:19 #
tjphxaz wrote:
I have D750 and for your specified uses suggest the Nikon 16-35 f/4 for landscapes, and Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 for fly fishing. The Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 is higher rated than Nikon and less $. A terrific walk-around lens. A good tripod and ballhead rated at least 22lb as well.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.