Twardlow wrote:
Have you nor thing better to do than listen to this radio crap, and worry about an alleged rape that occurred umpty-umpteen years ago. If the woman was a victim of rape, why didn't she pursue things through the law?
And...why do you care.
You really need something more important to worry about.
Tom........go look in a mirror.......that guy that you see looking at you is the one who needs "something better to do"!
It must really suck being a liberal and having to still be trying to defend a sleaze-bag rapist, lothario and whore monger like Bill Clinton! Tell me Tom........don't you have anything better to do?
If I found out that someone I had supported was a rapist, I would immediately turn on the POS in a heart beat and denounce him for doing such a despicable thing; (but fortunately I'm not a libtard, and I don't need to continue to support someone that I find out is really a despicable POS and rapist. )
Oh.....this "alleged" rape occurred "umpty-umpteen years ago you say? Tell me, Tom.....does the fact that it occurred "umpty-umpteen" years ago make it "OK" in your view? The way I see it Tom, a rapist, a murderer, or a child molester that committed their heinous crime "umpty-umpteen OR 6 months ago, is STILL a rapist, murderer or a child molester! I'm only concerned about "if" the did it, but not "when" they did it.
And needless to say, any woman who accuses her rapist more than 2 weeks after-the-fact is a liar, a whore, and should be "stoned"?
"alleged" rape? the way I see it, Tom, there are only two possibilities.......either Bill "did it" or else he "didn't do it"; She says he "did", he says "he didn't"; I wasn't there, I didn't see it happen, so I have to believe one of the two; Tell me, Tom.......what exactly in Bill Clinton's entire background do you see that would suggest the guy is an honest person and has a reputation for never doing such things? And exactly what is there in Broadrick's background that would suggest that she is prone to falsely accusing men of rape? I rather think if we were to have someone objective do a through background check on both people, that Bill Clinton would lose be several hundreds of miles! Oh.......and what about Bill Cosby? Do you think he should be given a pass as well?
You have obviously been listening to Hillary too long, Tom!
Radio "crap" you say? Now anything that's reported by radio is "crap"?......(at least when it's about some vile deed that's been perpetrated by a liberal! )
Tell me, Tom.......how long does it take to be "OK" if it was done by a Republican? 500 years maybe? forever?
And last but not least......why do YOU "care" because I "care"? Are only liberals allowed to "care"? Are you being paid to conduct a "cover-up", Tom?